Collateral Insights, UK ONS Edition
Proving jabs cause deaths in "vaccine" recipients. Thanks, UK ONS!
This post is giving credit where credit is due - the UK ONS. While they concentrated on massaging deaths and cases for the vaccination categories over the last year and a half, they have inadvertently let the cat out of the bag now and again. Let us return to the original ONS dataset, available as of May 16th, 2022 at https://tinyurl.com/4jb6mnpz. I have just covered so far Table 1 (out of 9 tables), “Monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status for all cause deaths, deaths involving COVID-19 and deaths not involving COVID-19, per 100,000 person-years, England, deaths occurring between 1 January 2021 and 31 March 2022“ in “$cience Fiction, UK ONS Edition“. We have seen that massive highly time-variable “flows” of non-Covid deaths, according to the ONS, are caused by the rounds of “vaccinations”.
The fact that the ONS report in Table 1 allocates the largest fraction of these Covid jab-caused deaths to the unvaccinated proves that the allocation of morbidity among the vaccination statuses is being actively managed by the UKSHA/ONS to promote the “highly effective and exceedingly safe” “vaccines” at the expense of the unvaccinated; we see the proof here that the “vaccines” cause waves of mortality in the “vaccine” recipients that the ONS tries hard to obfuscate. They do a sloppy job at that, but enough to convince the ones that want to be convinced.
But it seems like the ONS did not care to massage another set of data, especially that it did not involve the vaccination categories. Namely, Table 9, “Whole period counts of all registered deaths grouped by how many weeks after vaccination the deaths occurred; for deaths involving COVID-19 and deaths not involving COVID-19, deaths occurring between 1 January 2021 and 31 March 2022, England“:
This table displays a number of curious patterns:
For the 10-39 and 40-49 year olds, the Covid deaths peak on Week2 then fall off to about Week7, then start increasing again (?). For all other age cohorts, the Covid deaths start very low, 1/2 to 1/6 (!!!) of the respective peak value, then increase rapidly to peak on Week3, then fall off to about Week10, then start increasing again ( except for the 90+):
The non-Covid deaths start at a very low level, 1/2 to 1/3 of the respective peak value, then increase rapidly for 3-4 weeks, level off and eventually start falling (for the 10-39 after Week4, for the 40-49 after Week7, for the rest after Week9 or Week10):
How can we make sense of it? Here’s my feeble attempt. If you have more/better ideas, be my guest and pitch in:
First of all, the “weeks after a jab” age cohorts only include the jabbed persons, therefore the Covid and non-Covid deaths that have been fraudulently transferred to the unvaccinated in the first few weeks after a jab do not register in the charts above;
the “non-Covid deaths” in the first 2-3 weeks post jab are being transferred to the unvaccinated, how else to explain the measure of “immortality” bestowed on the jab recipients for a number of weeks post jab? “Why on earth?” you’d ask? Out of the abundance of caution, it seems, lest a non-Covid death may be linked to the jab. I do not think the ONS is doing that, more likely the UKSHA actors are, like the doctors and nurses eager to nip any vaccine hesitancy in the bud. The non-Covid deaths start going down after Week7-10, which means that the jab injuries start slowing down after this much time!
And why would Covid deaths peak so badly on Week2 or Week3 after a jab? Instead of the “protection” to peak 3 weeks after a jab, it seems the “negative protection” peaks in its place? Because these stats show, beyond a reasonable doubt, that jabbing makes the recipient extremely Covid-vulnerable for a number of weeks, with the worst of the vulnerability in the first month post jab. Unless you refuse to believe the evidence in front of your own eyes and would rather have it explained away to you by fact-checkers. Keep in mind that the same UKSHA actors are fraudulently transferring the Covid deaths to the unvaccinated just as they did with the non-Covid deaths, for the same noble reasons. Looking at the corresponding Covid deaths graph, any jab seems to be the curse rather than the blessing, for 8-9 weeks post jab for the 50+ and seemingly forever for the 10-39 and 40-49 year olds, unless it does absolutely nothing of value for them!
And what do we see post Week9-10 for the Covid deaths? Starting going up again. Why? Simple, here comes the negative effectiveness of the jab, much faster than 6 months we were told about on so many an occasion. So, after enjoying the carnage of the post-jab Covid deaths, not to mention all the adverse events that already have taken place or are yet to come, the recipients are left with the negative efficacy right after 2 months post jab (averaged by the jab number, be it 1st, 2nd, or any other booster).
As the 10-39 and 40-49 display the worst pattern of Covid deaths, regardless how many have been fraudulently transferred to the balance of the unvaccinated, this serves as the proof that people under 50 cannot possibly derive any personal benefit from the jabbing.
And now they are getting around to mass-jabbing babies and, come fall, fifth jabs.