COVID-19 is SEVEN Times More Dangerous for Myocarditis Than Vaccine?
A "study" says so? Ha! Ha-Ha! Let's dive in...
The disinformation drop of the day:
Even though “myocarditis” wasn’t “the thing” until the mass Covid-19 vaccination campaigns of 2021, more like until mid-2021. Did they just miss this horrible outcome of Covid-19 for a year and a half, or is something else at play?
Let’s have a closer look at the “study”, “Myocarditis in SARS-CoV-2 infection vs. COVID-19 vaccination: A systematic review and meta-analysis” (Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, Aug. 29, 2022) makes its case based on the hand-picked studies supporting the premise:
We see that “Boehmer, 2021” states that having been infected with Covid-19 increases one’s risk of myocarditis 16-fold. How sweet! So, whom do they count as “infected”?
This study used EHR data from 40 health care systems* participating in PCORnet, the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (7), during January 1, 2021–January 31, 2022. …Persons with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result ≤30 days before receipt of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine were excluded from the vaccine cohorts; persons who had received an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose ≤30 days before a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result were excluded from the infection cohort. In the infection cohort, there were no other exclusions based on vaccination status.
How very nice! Why not compare January 1, 2020-January 1, 2021 with January 1, 2021- January 1, 2022, to make sure the “infected” were not “vaccinated” before or after the “infection”? Obviously, the study authors had their reasons which they did not care to share with us. So, in reality, they were comparing the Covid-19 vaxxed+infected strictly to those that haven’t been “infected” within 30 days of “vaccination”. Although we know full well that one’s risk of being diagnosed with Covid-19 is particularly high within those 30 days. Incidentally, one’s risk of having heart problems after the jabs is also particularly high within 30 days of the said jab. Have the esteemed study authors considered this as a study limitation? Of course not. So, in the garbage bin it goes. Next!
“Barda, 2021”:
The effect of vaccination on the various potential adverse events included in this study is presented in Table 2. The risk was substantially higher on either the multiplicative (risk ratio) or additive (risk difference) scales in the vaccinated group than in the unvaccinated group for myocarditis (risk ratio, 3.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.55 to 12.44; risk difference, 2.7 events per 100,000 persons; 95% CI, 1.0 to 4.6), lymphadenopathy (risk ratio, 2.43; 95% CI, 2.05 to 2.78; risk difference, 78.4 events per 100,000 persons; 95% CI, 64.1 to 89.3), appendicitis (risk ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.01; risk difference, 5.0 events per 100,000 persons; 95% CI, 0.3 to 9.9), and herpes zoster infection (risk ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.20 to 1.73; risk difference, 15.8 events per 100,000 persons; 95% CI, 8.2 to 24.2). Vaccination was substantially protective against adverse events such as anemia, acute kidney injury, intracranial hemorrhage, and lymphopenia.
This study actually shows 324% higher incidence of myocarditis, across all age groups, in “vaccinated” than in the unvaccinated. And we know full well that 18-24 year old males are at particular risk, being up to 44 times more likely to be diagnosed with myocarditis after the 2nd Moderna shot (“Age and sex-specific risks of myocarditis and pericarditis following Covid-19 messenger RNA vaccines”, Nature Communications, 2022.06.25). The other quoted “Barda, 2021” study does not provide any data for the unvaccinated, full stop. So, nothing supports the quoted “Barda 2021” 18-fold increase in the risk of myocarditis following the Covid-19 infection; just the opposite is true. Next!
To crown it all, “Murk , 2020” (publication date January 4, 2021) posits 8-fold increase in the myocarditis in infected rather than vaccianted. Except (!) the vaccinations didn’t commence yet! Nevertheless:
We included patients who received a diagnosis of COVID-19 between Mar. 1, 2020, and Apr. 30, 2020, and computed risk estimates and odds ratios (ORs) of association with COVID-19 for every ICD-10-CM diagnosis code. Among 70 288 patients with COVID-19, 69 of 1724 analyzed ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes were significantly associated with COVID-19.
Who was hospitalized with Covid back in 2020? We are talking mostly about 80+ with comorbidities. And, the study included altogether the whopping 1724 such patients. The End!
So much about the studies of tens of millions as recapped by CTV News:
The studies included nearly 58 million patients with cardiac complications who belonged to one of two groups: the 2.5 million who contracted the virus compared to those who did not contract the virus, and the 55.5 million who received the COVID-19 vaccination in comparison to those who did not.
What a load of bull!
So, the three numbers from three “spectacular” studies (one of three being non-existent to boot) “produced” the calculated 7-fold increase in Myocarditis risk in Covid-19 infected vs vaccinated. As if.
By the way, is this study, “Age and sex-specific risks of myocarditis and pericarditis following Covid-19 messenger RNA vaccines” (Nature Communications, 2022.06.25), included in the list of vaccination-induced myocarditis studies? Is there “44” in the lower column of the first slide above? How about this study from Israel, showing absolutely no increase in the rates of myocarditis or pericarditis after the Covid-19 infection, “The Incidence of Myocarditis and Pericarditis in Post COVID-19 Unvaccinated Patients-A Large Population-Based Study”(J Clin Med, 2022.04.15)? Of course not! And thus, we know the esteemed authors of the Frontiers “study” had an agenda too. In their own words:
We hope our findings will help mitigate vaccine hesitancy and increase vaccine uptake.
And this is how legends are born. Yet, it will be re-fired from all barrels of the Ministry of Truth foot soldier infowar weapons. And the lemmings will never know they are being lied to. That is the karma of the lemming.
Just as you thought it can’t get more absurd, they come up with this:
Appreciate all your hard work, thank you.
With respect to people who have been lied to and bamboozled, I will always hold on to hope that the good ones will see the light one day. I have seen it happen, and I've also been a part of it. I put things out there for people to read when they are willing to read it or run across it. Maybe today won't be the day it sinks in because of stress at home or work, but maybe tomorrow is.
Only when we give up hope is when we have truly lost.
We all have strengths and weaknesses in our knowledge of things. No one knows everything. We all realized the truth at different times for different reasons, even just being around wrong influences in life could be why. That doesn't make people stupid or just followers, but just in and at different places in life. Be respectful and help people understand when they are ready, it's the only way this will be won.
It is not just about covid or vaccines, but many broader fundamental human rights.
As for those who know what's happening, know it's wrong, and do nothing, I don't have any empathy towards them. I don't believe in karma - in terms of every day life - but I do believe they will need to answer to their wrongdoings, including silence and allowing things to happen.
Again, bless you and your work.
When I was at the Wellington protests I spoke to a doctor who had been mandated out of work - we specifically discussed this and he said with any viral infection the risk of heart damage is tiny. In all his years he was aware of only two cases. Why would it be any different with covid.
The problem is ... the CovIDIOTS believe whatever the MSM tells them. 1+1 = 7.