Low-Key Burial of WHO Pandemic Treaty
Laid to rest, oh, so quietly?
The seemingly imminent WHO Global Pandemic Treaty of 2024 met its untimely demise, for reasons unknown or unspoken (Al Jazeera, 2024.05.29):
Details of the main points where countries disagreed are not yet known, but diplomats present at the negotiations have revealed bits of information that point to disputes over intellectual property rights among other issues. Key among the points of contention appears to be a requirement for countries to share information on new disease-causing pathogens, as well as the technologies used to combat them.
What is most surprising is that the two main pushers of all things pandemic, the US and the UK, hit the breaks in the eleventh hour:
It is not clear which countries opposed this proposal, but the United States has seen domestic political resistance against the treaty.
Representatives in the United Kingdom delegation also said that they would only agree to sign off on an agreement that adhered to “British national interest and sovereignty,” according to reports by The Associated Press.
My hunch is that the population elimination by the needle is taking the back seat in face of WW3 taking shape in Ukraine and around Israel, Guyana, Taiwan, Iran, just for starters. Everyone is at everyone’s throat. Thus, the populations will be eliminated much faster in hot war than by the needle. And everything will be written off on the bad guys.
Still, the WHO assembly didn’t go empty-handed. They have managed to eke out a new definition of a “pandemic emergency” (“WHO member countries approve steps to bolster health regulations to better brace for pandemics”, AP, 2024.06.02):
Countries agreed by consensus to amend the International Health Regulations, which were last changed in 2005, such as by defining the term “pandemic emergency”…
WHO said countries have defined a pandemic emergency as a communicable disease that has a “wide geographical spread” or a high risk of one, and has exceeded or CAN EXCEED the ability of national health systems to respond. It's also defined as an outbreak that has or COULD CAUSE “substantial” economic or social disruption and requires quick international action, the agency said.
Coulda, woulda, shoulda…
Still, Tedros (Gates’ proxy) maintains optimistic outlook, spreading more misinformation by claiming that “Global pandemic treaty to be concluded by 2025” (Reuters, 2024.06.02):
LONDON (Reuters) -Talks aimed at reaching a global agreement on how to better fight pandemics will be concluded by 2025 or earlier if possible, the World Health Organization said on Saturday.
As it turns out, the best shot is by June 2025 (“Hope for global pandemic treaty rises — despite missed deadline”, Nature, 2024.06.03):
A final text is expected by the next assembly, to be held in May 2025.
With a slew of important elections among the irked, gagged and mRNA-shot populations between now and then, and new hot war zones popping up around the globe, June 2025 seems to be even less amenable point in time for the PUNDEMUCK treaty.
R.I.P.
The Left never gives up. They will resurrect this Frankenplan.
I can tell you as someone not in the west, there's a PR machinery contracting with news agencies + opinion writers worldwide to sell the treaty as a necessary protective initiative as x million died "from" covid. I've even seen it suggested that those anti-treaty are right-wingers! So, perhaps the PR people are currently plotting a new plan to manipulate public opinion. The good guys have to be aware of that at least.