Ontario Hapless Lying Gets Better of Them
It seems they have more and more to hide now. We have more receipts.
Uh-oh! Ontario has “restored” the “cases by vaccination status” statistics in its daily reports, in the new-and-improved format and without any retroactively processed data, of course:
The “unvaccinated” and “partially vaccinated” have been lumped together now into the “not fully vaccinated” class, and “fully vaccinated” split into “fully vaccinated” and “vaccinated with booster dose”. The cases among the “boosted” go on a tear, just as the cases in other categories level off or decline?! So much for the coveted increased protection (don’t forget to get your booster).
It looks awful for the combined “2+ jabbed”, but not as bad as it could have looked should they continued with the stats they terminated on Mar. 10:
On Mar. 10, “2+ jabbed“ were totaling 11.5 daily cases per 100,000 while “un-&under-jabbed” were totaling about 8 cases per 100,000 (the bottom picture above). Fast forward to the new stats on Mar. 28, we see that “2+ jabbed“ are now totaling about 14.5 daily cases per 100,000 while “un-&under-jabbed” are totaling just over 9 daily cases per 100,000 (the top picture above). No wonder they felt compelled to do something with this kind of data going the wrong way. Their calculus is obvious. They are banking on this adage from “1984”:
The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became the truth
Good try! Except we do not forget and we’ve saved the receipts, knowing full well whom we are dealing with.
Their shifting of the data formats gets the better of them in more ways than one though. If we were to look at “deaths by vaccination status” statistics, just recently made available, it seems they have inadvertently revealed the ugly truth about their misrepresentation of this key statistic in the official media, namely that the overwhelming number of unvaccinated fills the hospitals and ICUs. And probably dies? Somehow this was never explicitly stated, like, make your own conclusions. And now we know why:
From the above picture, which is definitely worth a thousand words of comments:
As jabs started being administered in Ontario in the spring of 2021, we see a growing number of Covid-19-attributed deaths in “not fully vaccinated“, as one would expect.
But very soon, in about 6 weeks, a number of deaths among fully-vaccinated starts picking up as well. Mind it, these are individuals past 2 weeks post their 2nd jab!
So much so that by the end of May 2021, the number of deaths among the “fully vaccinated” starts to exceed the number of deaths among the “underjabbed”! Wow!
After the summer of 2021 lull, the deaths among the “underjabbed” start picking up again, coinciding with the push to fully-jab the younger age cohorts.
Then something very peculiar starts happening: the small splashes of deaths among “underjabbed” (these probably being the boosted within 1-14 days of their booster shots), but also some unexplained spikes in the deaths of the “vaccinated with booster doses”. The latter probably the old folks homes’ residents and otherwise vulnerable getting their “increased protection”.
With the Omicron wave, the deaths among 2+-jabbed pick up, as are the deaths among the “underjabbed”. With the “boosted” again out-dying the “fully jabbed”! A closer look reveals that the combined number of deaths among the 2+-jabbed is not that far off from the deaths among the “underjabbed”. For example, at the very peak of the Omicron wave in the “underjabbed” at 0.7 deaths per 100,000, the deaths among “fully vaccinated and boosted” was about 0.38 deaths per 100,000 (Jan. 27. 2022). Fancy that! Weren’t we told that the unvaccinated die many times (“mostly” or “vast majority”) more often than the jabbed?
As the “underjabbed” include those that are truly “unvacinated” AND within 0-14 days after the 1st jab, and more likely after any jab (lest we trust them to be painfully honest in this classification while lying at every other opportunity), the conclusion is obvious: the unvaccinated never died in far greater numbers than fully jabbed or boosted. In fact, we can now be pretty sure that the opposite has been taking place all the way from the start of jabbing campaign in Ontario until now. All thanks to this disclosure from Public Health Ontario (Case numbers, spread and deaths).
Let’s have even closer look at the death rates of “fully vaccinated” and “vaccinated with booster dose”:
On Oct. 14, 2021, the boosting campaign started proving its efficacy in terms of preventing severe outcomes, as you can clearly see. So much effective that on Oct. 20, 2021 the “boosted” were dying at the rate 28 times higher than the “fully vaccinated”! Probably because the “booster” has been administered first to the most vulnerable and frail, serving as the proverbial coup de grâce. From Oct. 14, 2021 until Feb. 1, 2022 the “boosted” were out-dying “fully vaccinated” hands-down, after which time the parity has been achieved between the two classes of the jabbed. Apparently because the magic “booster” effect wore off 3 months after the third jab. But it is impossible to discern any benefit to the “jabbees” resulting from the 3rd jab. I wound guess that come the 4th jab, a.k.a the second booster, the precise death stats by jab will be impossible to obtain as they will come up with creating ways to mix-and-match different jab cohorts as to conceal the real outcomes. They just missed this one out of the abundance of confidence in the booster shot, and didn’t heed the evidence of their own eyes. But they will surely mend their ways going forward, as they did a few times already.
Be my guest and obliterate my arguments with even better ones.