PKB: Court cases against “vaccination” mandates and measures
"Plandemic" Knowledge Base Topic
A B.C. judge has ruled that a lawsuit opposing federal and provincial COVID-19 restrictions can not proceed in its current form (CTV News, 2022.09.04), noting its claims of "global conspiracies" and "crimes against humanity" can't be adjudicated in civil court.
However, Justice Alan Ross declined to dismiss the case in its entirety and instead ruled that the plaintiffs can – individually or as a group – amend the claim. "Put simply, individuals have standing to question whether state actions infringe their Charter protected rights. Hence, in this case, there is a prospect that the plaintiffs could put forward a valid claim that certain of the COVID-based health restrictions instituted by the Federal or Provincial governments infringed their Charter rights," he wrote. "The existence of a single potential, viable cause of action means that it would be improper for me, at this stage, to foreclose upon the plaintiffs’ right to bring their claims."
“Youth Cannot Be Mandated to Get COVID-19 Vaccine, Ontario Court Rules” (Epoch Times, 2022.08.17):
A 12-year-old girl who does not want to take the COVID-19 vaccine cannot be mandated to do so, an Ontario judge has ruled in a family court dispute.
“The science relating to COVID-19 is developing,” wrote Justice Christopher Corkery of the Ontario Superior Court. “The ‘facts’ are changing.”
The Justice also noted that, with informed consent, many factors should be considered in weighing the risks and benefits of receiving a vaccine. “Does safe mean there are no side effects?” Corkery wrote. “Is the vaccine effective in protecting her from contracting COVID-19, from spreading it, from dying from it, from severity of symptoms?” “Requiring her to be vaccinated against her will would not respect her physical, emotional and psychological safety, security and well-being but would in fact put her at risk of serious emotional and psychological harm.”
“Ottawa police detective allegedly sought links between COVID vaccine and child deaths” (Toronto Sun, 2022.08.09):
Investigators with the Ottawa Police Service’s professional standards unit allege Const. Helen Grus committed discreditable conduct when she took on a private investigative project to find the vaccination status of parents whose infants or children had died. On Jan. 30, 2022, Grus also allegedly interfered directly with an investigation into an infant’s death by contacting the father of a deceased baby to inquire about the mother’s COVID-19 vaccination status without the lead investigator’s knowledge
With respect to the third request for a declaration, the Statement that the College issued on April 30, 2021 is not an instrument that can attract a declaration of invalidity. It is a guideline and a recommendation only. As such, it is not binding on any tribunal that may consider the matter further. The Applicant is not being investigated for breaching or violating the Statement; she is being investigated for professional misconduct and/or incompetence. If there is a hearing on the merits, and the Respondent College takes a position similar to the one outlined in the Statement or relies on the Statement, at that point the tribunal hearing the merits will have an opportunity to consider and rule upon whether the position taken in the Statement constitutes an unconstitutional violation of the Applicant’s free speech rights.
“Catholic nurse had right to Covid shot exemption: Ontario arbitrator” (True North, 2022.07.20):
The nurse is a member of the Latin Mass Catholic community and had requested to be exempted from the city’s vaccine mandate, alleging that the vaccine had links to aborted preborn children.
Arbitrator Robert Herman stated that given the unnamed nurse holds a sincere belief that has a sufficient connection to her creed, “to get vaccinated would interfere with the exercise of her faith and her relationship with the divine.”
The arbitrator cited the 2004 Syndicat Northcrest c. Amselem Supreme Court decision, where it had ruled that in order for something to be considered religious discrimination, there has to be a connection or “nexus” to the person’s religious faith as well as a sincerity in that person’s beliefs.
“19 firefighters sue Calgary for $38 million over vaccine mandate” (True North, 2022.07.18):
A statement of claim to the Court of Queens Bench of Alberta details $2 million in damages for mental stress and Charter violations as well as violations under the Criminal Code. “By forcing its loyal employees to take experimental injections as a requisite to employment, the City has breached its legal duty to take reasonable steps to prevent bodily harm to its Employees contrary to section 217.1 of the Criminal Code of Canada,” the lawsuit reads.
“Judge rules doctors can require patient to receive Covid shot before life-saving transplant” (JCCF, 2022.07.12): “An Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench judge has ruled that the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms does not apply to the decision of an organ transplant team, which requires candidates to be vaccinated for Covid prior to their organ transplant.”
“Cancelled Saskatchewan professor taking university and health authority to court” (True North, 2022.07.09): “Dr. Francis Christian was suspended from his job as a professor of surgery after he called Covid shots “experimental injections” and said vaccinations of children against Covid-19 should be halted. The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF) has filed a claim on behalf of Christian challenging his suspension and termination from his teaching post.”
“Tamara Lich, arrested for allegedly breaching bail conditions” (Police on Guard for Thee, 2022.06.29): “ Ms. Lich attended the ceremony, along with her lawyers, and acknowledgement from Justice Phillips, that this would not be considered in breach of her conditions, knowing full well that she would be in close contact with other organizers. So, the questions to ask is, why does law enforcement feel that a breach was committed when this was already addressed in her bail review, and she was granted permission to attend?”
“Rocco Galati files Covid case against Bonnie Henry, John Horgan, Mike Farnsworth, Adrian Dix, and Others, including Trudeau/Tam” (Pudget Sound Radio, 2022.07.03):
“Court hearing today for Saskatchewan ban on outdoor protests” (JCCF, 2022.06.29): “From December 17, 2020 to May 30, 2021, Saskatchewan prohibited outdoor protests with more than 10 people, while allowing numerous public indoor gatherings to have at least three times as many people. For peacefully protesting and publicly expressing their opinions, Ms. Grandel and Mr. Mills were each issued $2800 fines. Ms. Grandel and Mr. Mills are two of dozens of individuals who have received tickets for peacefully protesting government restrictions. There is no evidence that police issued tickets to those protesting non-Covid related issues. For example, the Regina Police issued tickets to Ms. Grandel for numerous protests she attended in Regina, including protests with as few as 20 people in attendance. In contrast, on June 5, 2020, Regina Police Chief Evan Bray himself attended a large Black Lives Matter rally with hundreds of people and many other police officers, when the Government’s 10-person limit for outdoor gatherings was also in effect.”
“Emergencies Act inquiry will be show to watch in September” (Toronto Sun, 2022.06.28): “…the Commission got the federal government to agree to release all documents related to the controversial invoking of the Act. This is a big deal because earlier this year the feds used the argument of Cabinet confidentiality to not release the documents in a court case civil liberties groups commenced against them.
The Ontario Provincial Police and Ottawa police will also be there. As for other voices, they lean to those who have already stated their opposition to the invoking of the Act. These include the Canadian Constitution Foundation, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, constitutional expert Professor Ryan Alford and the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms.
“Metrolinx employees launch $2 million in claims over vaccine mandate, unpaid leave“ (2022.06.21): “Unless there is a government mandate that specifically requires that employees be vaccinated against COVID-19 (which hasn’t happened for provincially regulated transit workers), it is illegal for an employer to change fundamental aspects (pay, duties, work location) of an employee’s job, without their permission. This includes making vaccination a mandatory term of employment for someone whose contract does not require it. An employer does have the option of firing an employee who refuses to get vaccinated. But the termination would not be “for cause” – without severance and Employment Insurance – unless the company was enforcing a government vaccine mandate. Therefore the firing would be considered without cause, meaning that the employee would be owed as much as 24 months’ pay, depending on various factors. …“Metrolinx had been allowing people to work from home continuously since March 2020, and all of a sudden, my clients are no longer allowed to work at all because they did not agree to a vaccine policy that was never, ever required of them in their contracts,” said Fainzilberg. “That is… a very clear breach of (the employment) contract.””
“Federal Employee Lawsuit Statement of Claim Filed” (policeonguard.ca, 2022.06.17): “The Federal Employee Lawsuit, Statement of Claim has been filed by Constitutional Lawyer, Rocco Galati. Police on Guard spearheaded this lawsuit for everyone affected by these unconstitutional mandates. We had over 600 Plaintiffs, making it one of the largest lawsuits Rocco has undertaken.”
“Maxime Bernier and Brian Peckford to continue legal challenge against feds’ mandates“ (True North, 2022.06.14): “Despite the Trudeau government’s decision to suspend the vaccine mandate for domestic travel, People’s Party of Canada leader Maxime Bernier and former Premier of Newfoundland Brian Peckford say they will continue their legal challenge against the federal government’s vaccine mandates.“
“Feds refusing to compensate lost salaries of unvaccinated federal workers” (True North, 2022.06.16): “Several major unions including the Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC), the Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada (PIPSC) and the Canadian Association of Professional Employees (CAPE) have launched grievance actions on behalf of the impacted employees. According to CAPE President Greg Phillips, his union will also seek paid compensation for lost salaries of workers. “
(True North, 2022.06.15): “The Liberals have suspended their vaccine mandate for air and rail travel, but a constitutional challenge against the mandate by PPC leader Maxime Bernier and former Newfoundland premier Brian Peckford continues to prevent a similar mandate in the future. The lead counsel for the action, Keith Wilson, joins the Andrew Lawton Show to discuss. Also, Alberta United Conservative Party leadership candidate Rebecca Schulz joins to discuss her bid to become Premier of Alberta.”
“Federal public sector unions say vax mandate “now is unreasonable”“ (True North, 2022.05.22): “The Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada (PIPSC), the Canadian Association of Professional Employees (CAPE) and the Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC) have all filed grievances against the federal government on behalf of their members, as reported by the National Post.“
“Federal Court to hear challenge to Canada's COVID-19 vaccine requirement for travel“ (Castanet Net, 2022.05.12): “Constitutional lawyers are set to argue against the federal government’s mandatory COVID-19 vaccine requirements for air travellers. The action brought against the federal government will be heard Sept. 19 – 23 at the Federal Court of Canada, which resolves problems arising from applications of federal laws.“
“Fraser Valley woman has $5,750 COVID violation ticket dropped by Crown“ (Surrey Now-Lader, 2022.05.12): “An unnamed Chilliwack woman has had a $5,750 COVID ticket dropped by Crown counsel, according to the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF). When she arrived at the border, Ms. C was informed by government agents that she would have to submit to a PCR test,” according to the release. “Ms. C politely and respectfully declined, on grounds of bodily autonomy and personal health.“
“University of Toronto (UoT) drops vaccine mandate after being hit with human rights complaint“ (Dr. Paul Alexander, 2022.04.05): https://canadianmale.wordpress.com/2022/03/30/university-of-toronto-drops-vaccine-mandate-after-being-hit-with-human-rights-complaint/
“Appealing a Court Decision Re: COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates“ (Dr. Byram Bridle, 2022.03.23): “I previously wrote about a court case in which an injunction was being sought for relief from a COVID-19 vaccine mandate for healthcare workers in Ontario (see the article here). The injunction was not granted. This case is now being appealed.
The Appellant filed affidavits from its impacted members, attesting to the fact that they saw no other real choice but to submit to vaccination to keep their employment. For these employees, some future determination of a labour arbitrator finding that the policy was indeed unlawful would be meaningless. For those who submitted to vaccination against their consent, the vaccination could not later be undone.
The Application Judge erred by narrowing the harm facing the Appellant’s
bargaining members as only the loss of income that would result from termination. The Application Judge entirely disregarded the real and substantial concerns for violations of bodily autonomy raised by the evidence before her. The Application Judge erred in concluding that because no one was being “forced” to be vaccinated, those who did submit to vaccination were doing so of their own free will. As will be shown in the Appellant’s argument, physical force is not required to establish a violation of a person’s consent. Such a strict interpretation does not accord with existing jurisprudence on informed consent. Consent to a medical treatment cannot be said to have occurred when a person is compelled through threat of job loss and duress to undergo such treatment.“
“COVID-19 'Vaccine' Mandates“ (Dr. Byram Bridle, 2022.02.08): “I recently served as an expert witness in an injunction hearing. Specifically, relief from the COVID-19 ‘vaccine’ mandate was being sought by hospital workers facing the loss of their jobs for not taking a jab that is, at best, irrelevant in the context of the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 and, at worst, enhances the risk of infection and disease and possibly even death due to COVID-19…“
“Charter challenge by 2 Ontario churches opposed to public health restrictions gets underway Monday“ (CBC, 2022.01.31): “A challenge by two Ontario churches of public health restrictions amid the COVID-19 pandemic begins Monday, with their lawyers arguing the measures violate the right to freedom of religion and assembly under the Constitution.”
“As unvaccinated workers sue for wrongful dismissal, Ottawa working on shielding employers“ (Global News, 2022.01.20): …lawsuits from fired unvaccinated workers are beginning to pile up — and the federal government's protections are nowhere to be seen. "We are seeing a huge amount of cases, claims, lawsuits involving terminations resulting from an individual's vaccine status," said Lior Samfiru, a Toronto employment lawyer and co-founder of Samfiru Tumarkin LLP."In fact, in my 20 years of practising law, I have not seen so many cases dealing with the same issue over such a short period of time."
“Three U of Winnipeg Collegiate instructors sue school, province over vaccine mandate“ (Global News, 2022.01.19): The three instructors contend the vaccine policy violates their Charter right to be protected from unreasonable search and seizures, including disclosing private medical information such as vaccine status or COVID-19 test results. “The policy seeks to coerce employees to be vaccinated against their will, without informed consent. The Policy amounts to an expressed intention to engage in a conspiracy to commit assault.” The instructors are asking for a stay of the U of W’s vaccine mandate until it can be reviewed by a judge. They are also asking for up to a million dollars in damages for the “intentional infliction of mental distress, and assault and battery,” and another million in damages for violating their Charter rights.
Thanks for reading Live to Fight Another Day! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
“UK Lawyer Anna de Buisseret with the police regarding jab injuries and Met Police investigation“ (VIDEO, Rumble, 2022.01.17): “She informs the constable of the ongoing Met police investigation, also the one registered in the International Criminal Court in the Hague, (ICC)“
“UK Team File Complaint of Crimes Against Humanity With The International Criminal Court” (The EXPOSE, 2021.12.10): “A complaint has been filed with the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court on December 6th, 2021 by a team from the UK on behalf of the people. They are alleging crimes committed by UK government officials and international world leaders of various violations of the Nuremberg Code, crimes against humanity, war crimes and crimes of aggression perpetrated against the peoples of the UK.“
“A new lawsuit brought in a joint effort by The New Civil Liberties Alliance, the Attorney General of Missouri, and the Attorney General of Louisiana against the President of the United States” (The Postmillenial, 2022.09.01):
The suit is brought under the first amendment right to freedom of speech. The lawsuit seeks to identify among other things "all meetings with any Social-Media Platform relating to Content Modulation and/or Misinformation."
The discovery shows that there was "A recurring meeting usually entitled USG – Industry meeting, which has generally had a monthly cadence, and is between government agencies and private industry. Government participants have included CISA’s Election Security and Resilience team, DHS’s Office of Intelligence and Analysis, the FBI’s foreign influence task force, the Justice Department’s national security division, and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Industry participants have included Google, Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, Microsoft, Verizon Media, Pinterest, LinkedIn and the Wikimedia Foundation. Communications across 11 federal agencies reveal that the federal government, under the Biden administration, "has exerted tremendous pressure on social-media companies—pressure to which companies have repeatedly bowed," the New Civil Liberties Alliance details in a new release. The social media companies that were part of this Partner Support Portal include Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and LinkedIn. The CDC invited "all tech platforms" in to their meeting to discuss how to suppress free speech about Covid online.
“Over 50 Biden Administration Employees, 12 US Agencies Involved in Social Media Censorship Push: Documents” (The Epoch Times, 2022.09.01):
Over 50 officials in President Joe Biden’s administration across a dozen agencies have been involved with efforts to pressure Big Tech companies to crack down on alleged misinformation, according to documents released on Aug. 31. Senior officials in the U.S. government, including White House lawyer Dana Remus, deputy assistant to the president Rob Flaherty, and onetime White House senior COVID-19 adviser Andy Slavitt, have been in touch with one or more major social media companies to try to get the companies to tighten rules on allegedly false and misleading information on COVID-19, and take action against users who violate the rules, the documents show. In July 2021, for instance, after Biden said that Facebook was “killing people” by not combating misinformation effectively, an executive at Meta reached out to Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, a Biden appointee, to say that government and Meta teams met after the remarks “to better understand the scope of what the White House expects from us on misinformation going forward.”
“NCLA Clients Join Missouri and Louisiana Suit Challenging Gov’t-Directed Social Media Censorship” (NCLA, 2022.08.02): “New Civil Liberties Alliance joined the lawsuit, State of Missouri ex rel. Schmitt, et al. v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., et al., representing renowned epidemiologists and co-authors of the Great Barrington Declaration, Drs. Jayanta Bhattacharya and Martin Kulldorff, as well as Dr. Aaron Kheriaty and Jill Hines. Social media platforms, acting at the federal government’s behest, repeatedly censored NCLA’s clients for articulating views on those platforms in opposition to government-approved views on Covid-19 restrictions.”
The judge determined the service members faced a “violation of their constitutional freedom” by the Air Force’s “clear policy of discrimination against religious accommodation requests.”
“On how things might unfold after a critical mass understands the US government’s mass control, maiming and murder program as such“ (Bailiwick News, 2022.06.30): Statutes that could be challenged in court and should be repealed by Congress as inherently unconstitutional and invalid include:
1983 Public Health Service Act Amendment. Added Public Health Emergencies (Section 319) to the 1944 Public Health Service Act and set the whole mess in motion.
1986 State Comprehensive Mental Health Services Plan Act. Established and funded a National Vaccine Program and granting vaccine manufactures legal immunity.
1997 National Defense Authorization Act for FY98 and 1997 Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act. Transferred the US government’s chemical and biological weapons program from DOD to HHS by creating the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) framework under the 1938 Federal Food Drug and Cosmetics Act.
1998 Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appropriations for FY1999. Established and funded the domestic bioweapons depot: Strategic National Stockpile program.
2000 Public Health Improvement Act - Title I, Public Health Threats and Emergencies Act. Reworked and expanded the 1983 Public Health Emergencies section. Appropriated funding and established a working group on bioterrorism ‘countermeasures’ research and development.
2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force - Construed as putting the United States in a permanent state of war (Global War on Terror) with no limitations in time or geographically.
2004 Project Bioshield Act - Amended and expanded EUA laws. Eliminated Congressional and judicial oversight. Eliminated consumer protections and informed consent rights of human subjects. Established program for ‘qualified countermeasure’ research, procurement, contracting, manufacture, use and liability exemptions. Expanded HHS power to subject people to apprehension and indefinite detention on communicable disease predicates. Expanded coordination among Secretary of Health and Human Services, Secretary of Defense and Secretary of Homeland Security.
2005 Department of Defense, Emergency Supplemental Appropriations to Address Hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico, and Pandemic Influenza Act - Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act. Expanded HHS Secretary emergency powers, reduced judicial and Congressional checks, expanded liability shields for bioweapon/pharmaceutical product manufacturers.
2006 Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act. Further consolidated and centralized HHS Secretary power, subordinated state, county, tribal and local public health and law enforcement systems to federal agencies, set up BARDA (Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority) division under HHS.
2007 National Institute of Health Reform Act - More reorganization, consolidation of power and funding.
2012 National Defense Authorization Act - Codified authority for US President to order military arrest and indefinite detention of Americans without charge or trial under 10 USC 801 and 2001 AUMF.
2013 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) - Authorized domestic deployment of propaganda by the US government, on the American population.
2016 National Defense Authorization Act. Added ‘prototype’ contracting language to 10 USC 2371b, later renumbered 10 USC 4022, authorizing DOD to contract with pharmaceutical corporations to conduct otherwise illegal biological attacks on the American and global public without notice or consent.
2016 21st Century Cures Act - Authorized ‘real world evidence’ instead of valid clinical trials as grounds for FDA endorsement of general use of experimental products; authorized additional nullification of informed consent rights.
2017 Act to amend FDCA EUA statute, 21 USC 360bbb-3. Provided for “Additional Emergency Uses for Medical Products to Reduce Deaths and Severity of Injuries Caused by Agents of War”
2017 National Defense Authorization Act - Authorized DOD to conduct military operations on American soil and control American civilians in emergency situations involving Weapons of Mass Destruction, including biological weapons and materials.
2019 Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness and Advancing Innovation Act - Further consolidated federal power in HHS Secretary’s hands during public health emergencies, further merged public health and law enforcement systems, and further subordinated state, tribal, county and municipal governments and American civilians to direct federal control.
2020 Coronavirus Preparedness and Response Supplemental Appropriations Act- Appropriated $8.3 billion to Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Food and Drug Administration, Small Business Administration, Department of State and US Agency for International Development, for research and development of vaccines, therapeutics and diagnostics and other Covid programs.
2020 Families First Coronavirus Response Act. Appropriated $3.5 billion for Covid mass testing.
2020 Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act - Appropriated $2.2 trillion to kill small and medium-sized businesses and promote universal dependence on federal government for basic necessities. Appropriated $10 billion for “Operation Warp Speed.”
2020 Paycheck Protection Program and Health Care Enhancement Act -Appropriated $75 billion for Public Health and Social Services Emergency Fund (first funded in 2005), “to remain available until expended, to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus, domestically or internationally” plus $25 billion for research, development and deployment of Covid-19 tests.
2020 Consolidated Appropriations Act - $2.3 trillion spending bill, including $900 billion for Covid programs.
2021 Orange Book Transparency Act - Amended patent law under Federal Food Drug and Cosmetics Act, (21 USC 9)
2022 Consolidated Appropriations Act - Passed Congress March 15, 2022. $1,274,678,000 for the Public Health and Social Services Emergency Fund (first funded in 2005). $780,000,000 for new domestic bioweapons production, classified as ‘security countermeasures;’ $845,000,000 to stock the Strategic National Stockpile, established 1998, controlled by the CDC within HHS 42 USC 247d-6b(a); $300,000,000 “to prepare for or respond to an influenza pandemic,” including federally-funded construction or renovation of privately-owned pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities, if the Secretary of Health and Human Services finds such construction or renovation necessary; $1,000,000,000 to establish ARPA-H: Advanced Research Program Agency - Health, to conduct research and development of bioweapons misbranded as public health measures; $3,880,000,000 to US Agency for International Development (US-AID) for programs mislabeled as ‘Global Health Programs,’ including immunization programs, HIV/AIDS programs, The GAVI Alliance [population-control zealot Bill Gates’ Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization] and a multilateral vaccine development partnership, for, among other projects, “experimental contraceptive drugs, devices and medical procedures.”
“Enforcement of Biden's Federal Employee COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate Is Delayed—Again” (Government Executive, 2022.06.27): “A federal appeals court will rehear the case this fall in front of its full panel of its judges. The three-judge panel of the 5th Circuit reversed that judge’s decision in a 2-1 ruling in April, but enforcement was stalled due to a standard buffer period. The mandate was set to go back into effect in May, but a petition from those challenging the mandate for a rehearing from the entire 5th Circuit further delayed the Biden administration from taking action on employees out of compliance with the requirement. Now, the mandate is stayed until at least mid-September when the full court rehears the case.”
“ College Mandates Strike Back!“ (VIDEO, Odyssey, 2022.06.23): “ As college students throughout the country enjoy the beginning of their summer break, universities are gearing up to mandate another round of ineffective and dangerous COVID vaccine boosters when they return in the Fall. What are students doing to stop this? Civil Rights Attorney Warner Mendenhall joins students, Ben Lipp of the University of Cincinnati and Tyce Patt of the Ohio University College of Business, to discuss their lawsuits against the COVID vaccine and booster mandates.”
“Twitter suffers a devastating 9th Circuit defeat“ (Alex Berenson, 2022.03.04): “Because First Amendment, which Twitter appeared to think protects it from any and all legal and governmental scrutiny. Things have not gone as planned for the lil bird.“
“Pfizer, FDA Lose Bid to Further Delay Release of COVID Vaccine Safety Data“ (Children’s Health Defense, 2022.02.07)
“A federal district court in Texas has blocked the last Biden vaccine mandate, on federal employees” (Alex Berenson, 2022.01.21): Judge Jeffrey Vincent Brown upheld a suit from federal workers who are refusing to be vaccinated against Covid:
“The motion is GRANTED as to Executive Order 14043. All the defendants, except the President, are thus enjoined from implementing or enforcing Executive Order 14043 until this case is resolved on the merits.” Brown’s ruling said it was a “bridge too far” to let the president, “with the stroke of a pen and without the input of Congress, require millions of federal employees to undergo a medical procedure as a condition of their employment.”
“U.S. Supreme Court rejects Biden’s vaccine mandate for large businesses“ (Global News, 2022.01.13)
New Zealand High Court ENDS Jacinda Ardern’s Vaccine Mandate: “It’s a Gross Violation of Human Rights” (The Epoch Times, 2022.02.26):
The landmark case means that the police and NZDF cannot be fired for refusing to take the experimental vaccine. This case will be used to overthrow all of Ardern’s illegal mandates in New Zealand.
…Justice Cooke also agreed with the claim that the mandate impinged on the right to decline a medical procedure.
The judge said that while it’s clear the government isn’t forcing Police and NZDF employees to get vaccinated against their will and they still have the right to refuse vaccination, the mandate presents an element of pressure.
“The associated pressure to surrender employment involves a limit on the right to retain that employment, which the above principles suggest can be thought of as an important right or interest recognised not only in domestic law, but in the international instruments,” Justice Cooke stated.
New Zealand High Court: Vaccine Mandate Not ‘Demonstrably Justified,’ Breach of Rights (2022.02.25) https://www.scribd.com/document/561158050/Yardley-v-Minister-for-Workplace-Relations-and-Safety#from_embed
Enter your suggestions in the comments section below.
Thanks for reading Live to Fight Another Day! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.