Exposing Mass Formation Messages -Take 1

Garbage in - nonsense out.

As I have promised in “Mass Formation-> Mass Psychosis-> Mass Delusion -> Mass Correction”, it’s time to deal with the core mass formation messages being floated around in order to justify repeated “vaccinations” with harmful experimental substances with the effects the opposite of inducing immunity or the protection for the disease or death, at the current stage of Jab 3+. I won’t deal with the latter, but let us start working out the list of most influential mantras and expose their duplicity and/or idiocy. This work will probably need a few iterations. So let’s get to it:

• Message. “No one will be safe if not everyone is vaccinated.” It has been voiced on Aug. 21, 2021 by none other than the “preeminent medical expert” Klaus Schwab himself (what a character, eh?):

  The extended version of this message has been given in a factcheck from Sep. 21, 2021 “COVID-19: The Unvaccinated Pose a Risk to the Vaccinated”:“No vaccine is 100 percent effective, and the more virus is around us — in this case, carried by the unvaccinated, who are five times more likely to be infected and thus to spread coronavirus — the more likely the vaccinated are to become infected.”

  Retort. The sleight of the hand is to admit upfront that the Covid-19 vaccines do not work. Like, do not work at all: all “vaccinated” can get infected, it actually implies! None of them acquire immunity as the result of tis “vaccination”! Therefore, even if 100% are vaccinated in a given setting, eventually the virus will make its way there. And ALL the “vaccinated” with the “vaccines” that do not work will still be getting infected. Vantage point July 2022: just look at Portugal, New Zealand, or Australia. Having been vaccinated to the hilt and then boosted

  

  did not prevent the current constant flood of Covid deaths. It seems that the higher the levels of vaccination and boosting, the worse off the population is:

  

  One embedded fallacy in this message is implying that the unvaccinated will not build up natural immunity and will keep being the ones indefinitely infected. By now, at least, the opposite is true - the more times one has been vaccinated, the more susceptible one becomes to being infected or die, as, for example, the latest Ontario statistics indicate:

  

  

  Another embedded fallacy of the message is the assumption that the “vaccine” protection does not wane with time. What has actually played out is that the “vaccine” protection quickly turns negative — the more jabs one takes, the faster.

  Thus, although being perhaps “wishful thinking” back in mid-2021, this message has been completely discredited by the facts on the ground to the point that the opposite is now true:

  Reality. “No one will be safe if everyone will be vaccinated and continuously boosted” and “The ones that will remain safe are those that have not been vaccinated.”

• Message. “We must get vaccinated to protect the people who can’t.”

  Retort. In the case of these Covid-19 “vaccines”, getting vaccinated actually makes you more infectious. Therefore, the vaccinated become a much bigger threat to the unprotected than the unvaccinated with natural immunity, all according to the current scientific knowledge (see the retort to “No one will be safe if not everyone is vaccinated” above and “I have the right to be safe from being infected by the unvaccinated” below).

  Reality. “To protect the vulnerable, rely on your natural immunity — avoid continuous ‘vaccinations’”.

• Message. “The choice to be unvaccinated is tantamount to putting the health and safety of others willingly at risk”.

  Retort. If that was true there would have been no notions of bodily autonomy or informed consent on the books as of now already, and it would have been a criminal offense to reject ANY vaccine. The fact that it is not a criminal offense to decline a vaccine and that the notions of bodily autonomy and informed consent did exist up till this moment Covid-19 moment in history proves that it is not illegal for one to make health choices based on one’s own evaluation of risks and benefits. What’s more, the realities at this stage are:

  Reality. “The choice to stay unvaccinated and naturally immune is the best way to protect the health and safety of others” and “Vaccinating is tantamount to putting others willingly at risk.“

• Message. “I have the right to be safe from being infected by the unvaccinated”.

  Retort. The simple fact that it is not illegal for one to be unvaccinated (see the retort to the message “The choice to be unvaccinated is tantamount to putting the health and safety of others willingly at risk“) means that there is no such right. People get infected all the time by other people with myriad of diseases. We all do many times during our lives. Assuming there was such a right against “being infected by the unvaccinated”, how about the right of not being infected by the vaccinated? We know that the vaccinated against Covid-19 get infected more often and are infectious for longer than the unvaccinated at this time, based on the current scientific evidence. See “Duration of Shedding of Culturable Virus in SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (BA.1) Infection”, panels D and E (NEJM, 2022.06.29):

  

Reality. “The unvaccinated have the right to be safe from the harassment by the vaccinated.”

Please let me know how I am doing so far, and suggest your “favourite” Covid messages you also want rebutted — we’ll work on them in the next revision of this document.