Results COVID-19 occurred in 1475 (3%) of 48 344 employees during the 100-day study period. The cumulative incidence of COVID-19 was lower in the “not up-to-date” than in the “up-to-date” state. On multivariable analysis, not being “up-to-date” with COVID-19 vaccination was associated with lower risk of COVID-19 (HR, 0.77; 95% C.I., 0.69-0.86; P-value, <0.001). Results were very similar when those 65 years and older were only considered “up-to-date” after receiving 2 doses of the bivalent vaccine.
Conclusions Since the XBB lineages became dominant, adults “not up-to-date” by the CDC definition have a lower risk of COVID-19 than those “up-to-date” on COVID-19 vaccination, bringing into question the value of this risk classification definition.
Summary Among 48 344 working-aged Cleveland Clinic employees, those not “up-to-date” on COVID-19 vaccination had a lower risk of COVID-19 than those “up-to-date”. The current CDC definition provides a meaningless classification of risk of COVID-19 in the adult population.
Just wow! Show this to anyone asking anyone to keep up-to-date on Covid jabs. And what about those lost souls that keep jabbing themselves like rabbits?
Doesn't matter. Heels are dug in. We're well past reason and evidence. Just look at people addicted to masks. There's something much deeper and worrying in play here.
Every time my Windows computer has to do an "update", I think about Bill Gates and thank God that I haven't subjected my body and soul to his "vaxxines".
Doesn't matter. Heels are dug in. We're well past reason and evidence. Just look at people addicted to masks. There's something much deeper and worrying in play here.
Every time my Windows computer has to do an "update", I think about Bill Gates and thank God that I haven't subjected my body and soul to his "vaxxines".