Discussion about this post

User's avatar
HiggsBosonSlut's avatar

Let me get this straight: about 80% of the population got jabbed, but 77% got sick? Even if you take the 20% unjabbed into the sick figure (which is a big leap in logic) that leaves 57% of the jabbos who got sick anyway. [edited for math 'cos I think I did it wrong earlier]. So we have 38,500,000 total Canadians. We'll say 80% jabbed, which is 30,800,000. So 7,700,000 unjabbed.

77% of the total population (# that got sick) is 29,645,000. If every unjabbed got sick, that would leave 23,100,000 of jabbed who got sick anyway. So 23.1 mil out of 30.8 mil jabbed got sick, which is 75% (hey my math was not too far off earlier).

And it's worse stats if any of the unjabbed stayed healthy. This abject failure is why they were trying to cover it with "oh but it lessens symptoms or duration."

Wait till you correlate other illnesses going on the rise (cancer, myo/peri-carditis) date coincident with this campaign. Or is the MAID group supposed to figuratively and literally bury that evidence?

Expand full comment
Peregrine's avatar

The vaxxx is working exactly as the depopulationist globalists wanted: slow enough to escape blame but steady death enough to fulfil their master plan.

THEY got saline, the proletariat got the mRNA.

It was socially and economically tough, but the wifely babe and I escaped the jab.

Expand full comment
54 more comments...

No posts