Subtitle:"Many covid-19 vaccines occasionally cause side effects such as blood clots or heart inflammation, but, overall, they appear to be beneficial in preventing heart and circulatory conditions"
Intro:Many covid-19 vaccines appear to reduce the risk of heart attacks, strokes and other blood clot conditions for at least six months after they are administrated, according to a study of the health of about 46 million people amid the coronavirus pandemic. This is despite them causing rare side effects that affect the heart and blood clotting system. The net benefit to heart conditions most probably happens because the vaccines protect against severe covid-19, which itself…
How can one say, on the same breath, that the jabs (A) cause heart attacks and blood clots and then assert that (B) they are beneficial in preventing the exact conditions they cause? Seems like an contradiction and absolute impossibility, to my unsophisticated mind.
Unfortunately, the main thrust of the NewScientist article is behind a paywall. If you happen to be a subscriber to NewScientist or have a link to the study the article alludes to, please let me know where that study can be found.
So, for the lack of immediate evidence I started looking for other such articles and studies. And found this overlooked article by WebMD from Feb 23, 2023, along exactly same lines. “Vaccination Reduces Post-COVID Heart Attack, Stroke Risk”:
In the largest and most diverse analysis to date, researchers have found that the risk of post-COVID heart attack or stroke was reduced by 41% in people who are fully vaccinated. Even partial vaccination gave some protection, reducing the risk of a major heart event by about 24%.
Sounds great? Except, the term “fully vaccinated” or “partially vaccinated” conveniently transfers the 0-14 days after the jabs and anything that happens there to the “unvaccinated”.
Firstly, that is “their” new definition of what being partially or fully vaccinated means, introduced specifically for Covid-19 jabs.
Using data from the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C), we included patients aged 18 to 90 years who were initially infected with SARS-CoV-2 between March 1, 2020, and February 1, 2022. Starting from the first day following initial infection, the follow-up time was 180 days. We considered mRNA vaccines by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna and viral vector vaccines by Johnson and Johnson. Individuals were classified as fully vaccinated if they received ≥2 mRNA vaccines or 1 Johnson and Johnson vaccine ≥14 days before SARS-CoV-2 infection and as partially vaccinated if they received only 1 mRNA vaccine or their second mRNA or 1 Johnson and Johnson vaccine within 14 days of infection.
Kaplan-Meier curve for patients with COVID-19, stratified by full (red), partial (green), and no (blue) vaccination. From index infection, median time to Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE) was 17 days. In total, 3,175 patients died following MACE.
To fully appreciate the absurdity of this picture, one needs to be familiar with what a Kaplan–Meier curve (or Kaplan–Meier estimator) is.
The Kaplan–Meier estimator, also known as the product limit estimator, is a non-parametric statistic used to estimate the survival function from lifetime data. In medical research, it is often used to measure the fraction of patients living for a certain amount of time after treatment (the vertical axis value). The faster the curve trends down, the more patients die around that point in time.
Or, in our case, the faster the curve trends down, the more people under study get strokes, heart attacks and such.
So, half of the MACEs (heart attacks, strokes, or cardiovascular deaths) happen in the first two weeks plus three days following the diagnosed Covid infection, between March 1, 2020, and February 1, 2022. And the “unvaccinated” are at the highest risk of MACEs in the first 17 days following the infection (where the blue line drops the fastest in the chart above), before the Covid infection has had time to progress into the severe disease, which, in their own words above, is the culprit? In fact, looking at the graph above, the Covid infected are most at risk before they even get symptomatic. I.e., the less time you’ve been infected, the more chances that you are going to catch a MACE?Hmm… Isn’t it something else we know of that causes MACEs in this way? I.e., the closer to the event, the higher your chances of croaking suddenly (excuse me for resorting to the vernacular). According to the “study”. I am seriously starting to doubt these “scientists” are capable of reading themselves or understanding what they “produce”.
I recall seeing the statistics telling us that the leading cause of Covid infection IS Covid “vaccination”, which I exemplified in my post “Hiding in Plain Sight” exactly in the period under study, October 2021.
The Canadian province of Ontario inadvertently divulged this pattern of infections following “vaccination” (they pulled this graph from the report soon thereafter):
The shades of blue you see on the left in 0-14 days following the 1st or 2nd jab represent the “unvaccinated” that have to thank “vaccinations” they just took, for their Covid infection. Coincidentally, that is also the period where the majority of MACEs transpire. Plus, the “unvaccinated” had the opportunity to “collect” these effects twice or three times before the end of the study period of February 1, 2022, having been jabbed-infected or infected and then jabbed, and then jabbed two more times.
Just look at the beautiful peaks of infections in the 0-20 days following the 1st and 2nd “immunization”.
So, the conclusion that Covid-19 vaccines cut the risk of heart attacks and strokes is based on the faulty inputs. Not faulty, fraudulent, actually. They always knew what would transpire once the jabbinations commence, and preempted the fallout by introducing that nonsense concept of 0-14 days post jab to be counted as “unvaccinated”.
This is just standard totalitarian inversion: War is Peace; Freedom is Slavery; Deadly Heart Toxin protects your heart; chocolate ration is increased from 5g to 10g; etc. Same thing. It's lies dreamed up by the marketing and advertising team hired by pharma to protect and promote their products. The 'scientists' who publish such papers are on the take.
This is just standard totalitarian inversion: War is Peace; Freedom is Slavery; Deadly Heart Toxin protects your heart; chocolate ration is increased from 5g to 10g; etc. Same thing. It's lies dreamed up by the marketing and advertising team hired by pharma to protect and promote their products. The 'scientists' who publish such papers are on the take.
New frontiers in chutzpah.