CORRECTION: After further analysis in “Exposing THE EXPOSE”, it has turned out that the apparent 5% of bad lots is an artifact of CDC/FDA scrubbing the VAERS database of deaths and serious adverse events. Which means that the other 95% are not harmless either.
We have established so far (“Beware of Greeks Bearing Gifts: Conclusions”) that “vaccination” drives are the epidemic waves in their own right. In the previous post, we have established that, in aggregate, in large countries or across many small ones lumped together, we should expect about 667 injuries and 87 deaths per 100,000 jabs, in acute terms. Mid-term deaths and injuries are classified as not related to Covid-19, just your regular wear and tear. The long term is still out there to be determined.
Now it’s time to go from the bird’s eye view down on the ground and try to see when, how, and why exactly the mRNA (or viral vector, like AstraZeneca – not in this post) vaccines do this damage. Not from a pharmacological perspective, as we are not being told honestly what’s in them (see below). But what we can look at is the finer peculiarities of the production process, and also of the vaccination campaigns, one country at a time, sometimes one vaccine batch, or even one lot at a time. And the good news is, we have enough here to look at, and to make some meaningful conclusions to boot.
Excuse me for throwing more charts at you, but “a picture is worth a thousand words.” As I have mentioned in “Falling into Place Like Dominoes”, I have been stomped few times, with some countries, with apparently inexplicable lack of follow-through of mortality in response to the “vaccinations” at some stage of the “vaccination” campaign, just to be followed by a vigorous response at the next stage. For other countries, the Covid-19 attributed deaths were immediately spiking in response to the very first “vaccination” drive. One prominent example of the former is Australia. It is one of those few countries that had very little Covid-19 for a long while, only to get a truckload of it during the “vaccination” campaign that was supposed to prevent just that from happening. The “vaccination” campaign commenced in Australia around Feb. 15, 2021, with no induced Covid-19 mortality whatsoever. Up until Jul. 9, 2021, when the campaign apparently caught new wind in the form of new more robust supplies. And suddenly the “vaccinations”-deaths correlation starts happening big time from that point and onward:
Now, let’s have a look and another three countries: Czechia, Slovakia, Romania. All three had similar Covid-19 dynamics prior to vaccinations. All three started vaccinating around Dec. 27, 2020, all three with Pfizer, identical vaccination dynamics in all three between Dec. 27, 2020 and May 16, 2021 (the graphs below), except Romania lagging a bit with its jabs between Apr. 15 and May 15, 2021. One would also expect same responses in terms of vaccination-induced deaths and cases.
Indeed, Slovakia and Czechia exhibited immediate spike in Covid-19 attributed deaths the very next day or two and synchronized their epidemic curves until now, pretty much. But what happened in Romania was the complete opposite. Instead of doubling its death rate within a couple of weeks, Romania exhibited a very weak initial response to “vaccinations” in therms of Covid-19 attributed deaths, compared to the other two. It only produced a limited spike in deaths around June 15, and that one on the down side of its vaccination drive from May 15 until Jun. 30. But! When it decided to renew its “vaccination” push in Oct. 2021, the deaths and cases responded spectacularly this time around. “Try, try, try again,” as the old adage goes?
You can look up multiple other examples of this phenomenon at ourworldindata. So, to recap, more often than not, the mRNA “vaccination” drives will cause the concomitant spikes in Covid-19 attributed deaths and cases. But on multiple occasions they don’t. What gives?
While reading about THE EXPOSE report, keep in mind the correction above. The clues are provided by THE EXPOSE’s analysis of the VAERS database. Turns out that a small number of batches causes all the damage, and these batches are spread around the US thinly and widely (13-50(!) states). Whereas benign batches are usually shipped to no more than 12 states. What is a batch? It’s up to 25 pallets of the active ingredient in a Pfizer packaging factory, and a single batch is somewhere between 1 and 3million doses. The batches then are split into lots of not less than 1170 doses, but on average 6,000 doses per lot. Lots are the units shipped out from the packaging factory directly to the administrator of the vaccine, be it a hospital, a clinic, or a pharmacy. THE EXPOSE’s investigation of VAERS data revealed that reported deaths due to the Pfizer vaccine were only associated with certain batches of the jab. They show that 96% of the lots of Pfizer vaccine had zero death reports made against them. Meaning the 2,828 reported deaths were associated with just 4% of the lots of Pfizer vaccine. The data also reveals that 2,908 lots (64%) had just a single adverse event report made against them, whilst 2 specific lots had over 3000 adverse event reports made against them. 30 lots of Pfizer vaccine had between 1,000 and 1,499 adverse event reports per lot, another 20 lots had between 1,500 and 1,999 adverse event reports per lot, and another 23 lots had between 2,000 and 2,499 adverse event reports per lot. This suggests that there were a small quantity of dangerous batches of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine and a large quantity of seemingly harmless (at least in the short term) batches of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine.
The same can be seen for the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine. Ninety-five-percent of the lots of Moderna vaccine had zero death reports made against them. Meaning the 2,603 deaths were associated with just 5% of the lots of Moderna vaccine. Thirteen lot numbers were associated with 41-60 deaths each, 2 lot numbers were associated with 61-80 deaths each and 1 lot number was associated with 81-100 deaths.
THE EXPOSE ends it investigation with these questions: • Why is it that certain batches of the vaccine have proven to be more harmful than others? • Why is it that certain batches of Covid-19 vaccine have proven to be deadlier than others? • Why is it that the most harmful and deadly Covid-19 vaccines were distributed across the entire USA, whilst the least harmful and deadly were only ever distributed to a few states? Was this done on purpose? • Could this just be a quality control issue?
These are open questions with no answers. Too bad THE EXPOSE didn’t try to sort the batches/lots chronologically by the VAERS entry dates. That could have helped us with the explanation why earlier “vaccination” stages in some countries are benign and the later ones are more “potent”. I might have to delve into VAERS myself at some point, or maybe one of my readers could volunteer?
One leaked email identified “a significant difference in % RNA integrity/truncated species” between the clinical batches and proposed commercial batches—from around 78% to 55%. The root cause was unknown and the impact of this loss of RNA integrity on safety and efficacy of the vaccine was “yet to be defined,” the email said. It’s unclear how the agency’s concerns were satisfied. According to one of the leaked emails dated Nov. 25, positive news had come from an undisclosed source in the US: “The latest lots indicate that % intact RNA are back at around 70-75%, which leaves us cautiously optimistic that additional data could address the issue,” the email said. EMA told The BMJ that the levels of truncated mRNA “and the amounts of a potential protein produced by the truncated mRNA would be too low to constitute a safety risk.” EMA did not comment on how truncated mRNA might affect efficacy. The issue was satisfactorily addressed, the agency underlined, when further information was supplied by the manufacturer.
Health Canada told The BMJ that Pfizer had conducted investigations into the root cause of reduced integrity in the commercial vaccine batches, and “changes were made in their processes to ensure that the integrity was improved and brought in line with what was seen for clinical trial batches.” Health Canada said the three agencies subsequently determined that “there was no concern with the RNA integrity or any other product specifications.” You ought to know that Health Canada does not control the quality of the Pfizer vaccines in any way whatsoever. The vaccine lots are shipped by Pfizer directly to the entity that administers them. “See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil.” Except this amounts to utter abrogation of their responsibilities.
Another “leak” is in the form of interviews given by a former Pfizer’s quality control manager and a whistleblower, Melissa Strickler, in Oct. 2021. These are very revealing interviews. Pfizer’s processes for its “vaccine” are strangely deviating from their usual norms. The compounding room has no idea what are the components they are mixing into the “product”. The “vaccine” glows in the dark, indicating it contains luciferase and/or graphene oxide. Why? And, of course, neither luciferase nor graphine oxide is listed as a component in the jabs. Another odd thing is that the production line never stops: they never correct or investigate anything, nor dump any batches, as usually happens. The line keeps rolling and the “product” keeps flying out the door. Thirdly, when FDA inspection comes, there is some unusual cover-up activity taking place, including blackening the windows (sic!) into the production rooms. Covering up what exactly? Strickler also has revealed top executive’s emails that admit “One or more cell lines with an origin that can be traced back to human fetal tissue has been used in laboratory tests associated with the vaccine program.” “I think they want nobody to have an excuse to not get it … and they’re denying all religious exemptions at Pfizer,” Strickler added. So much for how we can trust Pfizer, their benevolence, and their sincerity.
So, we see many red flags here, but we do not know what are the motives or reasons for their actions, and what are the effects of those actions. Nor from Pfizer itself, neither from EMA, FDA, or Health Canada (excuse my dry joke).
I would like also to mention numerous, albeit unsubstantiated, witness accounts of “vaccine” vials containing nothing but a saline solution, and of the US soldiers being administered those in their units by the military doctors early on in the vaxx campaign. Let me know if you happen to have any references to that.
Time to sum up. “Ye shall know them by their fruits.” These fruits are:
• uneven and high percentage of truncated mRNA sequences in the jabs (accidental or on purpose?) • luciferase and/or graphene oxide quantum dots in the jabs (what for, exactly?) Melissa Strickler speculates this is to be able to prove who has been vaccinated and who wasn’t, as the vaccines’ blood will glow. • the people compounding (mixing) the “product” ingredients are not allowed to know what they are mixing. This is exceptional, in place only for this “product”. So, obviously, they can’t check in any meaningful way the content coming in or going out of the vaccine factory (seems like someone has nefarious intents?) • the production line never encounters holdbacks, control stops/checks, or product discards. All is deemed shippable (how come?) • they have things to hide from FDA (what?) • the “vaccines” shipped to some countries seem to be initially benign, but later as “bad-ass” as in the rest of the countries (is this on purpose, and if so, what purpose?)
It’s obvious that more is happening here that meets the eye, and no one in the position of authority is inclined to ask any questions. Let alone demand answers. And all requests for emergency and other approvals of the “vaccine” are granted without any meaningful submissions – let’s be honest with ourselves.
By the end of this post it is apparent that, while we’ve established some facts, these facts raise even more questions. While we get no straight/any answers from the manufacturers, the medical authorities (NIH, CDC, FDA, Health Canada :-)), and certainly not from the mainstream media, we are left to speculate and choose the most sensible answers ourselves. But that is the task for the next post.
Please contribute to the comments section below so your questions/tips may be addressed/included as well.
P.S. From the future. “Broken Bioweapon” (Sasha Latypova, 2023.01.30):
