Another Lying Headline: "Vaxxed and Unvaxxed Children Equally Infectious"
Even as the study clearly shows that the vaxxed children are infectious for at least twice as long as the unvaccinated.
If there is one thing the fight against Covid taught us, it is this: “Never trust the [mainstream] news headlines.” The case at hand is today’s headline at the Daily Mail:
The article continues to state:
Children vaccinated against Covid are infectious for the same amount of time as their non-vaccinated peers, a new study out of California has found.
Whether or not students had received their bivalent Covid booster made no difference to the length of time they shed pieces of the virus after testing positive.
Both groups of kids aged seven to 18 were infectious for three days on average, according to the results from April to September 2022.
Taught by experience, we immediately look at the study itself, “Duration of SARS-CoV-2 Culturable Virus Shedding in Children” (JAMA, 2023.10.23), and what a surprise (NOT!):
Results: We contacted 156 children; 81 consented to participate, and 5 were lost to follow-up. Of the 76 participants, 52 (68.4%) were vaccinated, 41 (55.4%) were aged between 7 and 12 years, 38 (50.0%) were male, and 38 (50.0%) were female (Table). We observed a median duration of infectivity of 3 (95% CI, 3-3) days, with 14 participants (18.4%) infectious on day 5 and 3 (3.9%) on day 10 (Figure, A).
The median duration of infectivity among vaccinated children was 3 (95% CI, 3-3) days and among unvaccinated children, 3 (95% CI, 2-3) days (Figure, B).
Median 2-3 for the unvaccinated versus 3-3 for vaccinated? Hm… Let’s look at the Figure B:
What a shocker? As it turns out, the last unvaccinated tested positive on Day 5, while 3 of the vaccinated still tested positive on Day 10, at which point the “scientists” decided to stop collecting further evidence of vastly more infectious “vaccinated” children - “we’ve seen enough!” Only to conclude that “among vaccinated children, duration of infectivity was similar for children who received a booster vs those who did not.”
Fearing that “similar” might not be misleading enough, the esteemed authors go on to throw in this bold-faced lie in the discussion section, despite of everything the study actually revealed: “ There was no association between duration of infectivity and vaccination or booster status.”
Just try to imagine what the conclusions of the authors and the news headlines would have been if the actual stats for the vaxxed and unvaxxed children were flipped.
And that is $cience™ for you, and funding for more such studies for us. I ask my readers to put their scientist hats on and come up with their own punch lines for the study results. Happy sleuthing, everyone!
I would think 30 days minimum. Children would probably have a higher immune response to the bioweapon, so they would be the best way to spread the vaxx/virus. It was obviously the intended purpose of giving the vaxx to them. Correct? They were never in danger of the serious immediate complications from the “virus”. Long term, who knows? However, at present it seems like maybe no child really died from COVID. But man did they want to inject them. Starting at six months. Safe and effective, but never really tested. Unless we count these innocent children who had to have it, or the mothers of innocent children who had to get shot while they were pregnant, as their “test group”. How many miscarriages does it take to satisfy their desire? We tested it on the entire world and it worked perfectly for what our leaders wanted, which was less of us!
I am certain that the bivalent booster killed people like my mother, for instance. People like that (old and in 24/7 care) are not really good spreader candidates, but killing them off with the vaxx did have a positive outcome for the government in other ways. “No more social for you, here’s your off button”. Immediate reduction in the rate of burn. Kill enough and maybe our fund will last 11 years instead of just 10. There was obviously no benefit to the vaxx for anyone, and plenty of danger based on VAERS data, from even prior to six months into this mass genocide program. For sure, a lot of people are going to burn in hell for eternity for this, but it gives me no satisfaction.
"It would have been worse without the booster!"
That's not exactly what the data shows........