CDC Admits Bivalent Boosters Worse Than Useless

Harmful, actually. In short 4-5 months, more "negative efficacy" than monovalent jabs a year or more earlier.

This time the credit for the heads-up goes to Epoch Times for their June 15, 2023 post “COVID-Vaccinated More Likely to Be Hospitalized: CDC Data”. Yet, they didn’t provide the link to the CDC publication, which I was able to find here. And what I saw was really revealing.

The official narrative has been, lately, that although the jabs do not prevent infection, they do prevent severe outcomes, including hospitalization. Welcome to CDC c.a. June 2023. The CDC-reported absolute “vaccine” effectiveness against hospitalization after the monovalent number of jabs median 464 days post jabs is -8%. That means, the jabbed are more likely to be hospitalized than the unjabbed. Yet, those jabbed with bivalent boosters median 137 days prior reach the same -8% “vaccine” “effectiveness” as those jabbbed a year and a half earlier with “regular” Covid-19 jabs, against the latest Covid XBB variant:

Ponder this! CDC should be fact-checked and muzzled for spreading vaccine hesitancy, shouldn’t it?

In another bit of good news from the same CDC report, the “vaccine” “effectiveness” against ANY Covid variant is much worse for a recent (145 days prior) bivalent booster than for a 400 days prior last jab and rapidly approaches the negative territory:

Safe to project just a weeny bit farther in time, the jab effectiveness in preventing hospitalization with Covid-19 is undoubtedly solidly in the negative 6 months after the last bivalent booster, not that they wanted to show us this statistic. In other words, in 2023 the jabs tend to put you in the hospital more often than not. What not to like! Either you keep boosting like crazy, the adverse reactions, including death, notwithstanding, or the virus will catch up with you with a vengeance in a matter of months. Good deal?