27 Comments

Here is a comprehensive warning on the methodology of the totalitarianism we will soon complete through municipal governments https://substack.com/redirect/6b62ee19-69c4-4e12-bf6f-86ce5cc9975d?j

Expand full comment

Thank you for putting this together, very scary how much time and energy has gone into this and really behind the scenes. I had to do a lot of flipping back and forth to find the websites you are working with as I couldn't make it out from your screenshots. I'm in the C40 site and still can't find the report you are analyzing. Thanks for any help

Expand full comment

Thanks, sent your video and all the links to a number of people. These are the kind of details that will wake people up. I live in an old house which will be the perfect target.

Expand full comment

Let me know what kind of results you get

Expand full comment

That's what I think. It needs to go to farmers meat industry, car dealerships, restaurant industry. LOCAL BIAS local chambers of commerce. Would love it to get it to Hi-Rez or even Joe Rogan. Glenn Beck.. this can change people i consider collaborators

Expand full comment
Jun 17, 2023Liked by Andreas Oehler

Wow. Insane.

Expand full comment
Jun 18, 2023·edited Jun 18, 2023Liked by Andreas Oehler

G'day, Sergei!

Keep at them ...

Re "CDC Admits Bivalent Boosters Worse Than Useless"

My response:

At 0:35

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fXSLcYQHqFQ

Expand full comment
author

I started worrying, Bogdan! How's Covid in the land of Oz in the winter of 2023? 7th or 8th jab?

Expand full comment
author

It seems I'm not far off (https://www.smh.com.au/national/australia-is-in-its-seventh-covid-wave-what-s-next-for-the-goldilocks-virus-20230606-p5decs.html): "Some Australians are now up to six or more doses. We may need another dose any day if the changes mandates [sic!] it."

Expand full comment

What's "covid"?

Since 4 March I have practically logged off from the bird, substack, and other sm platforms.

Stories for you:

1. I still see masked solo people in cars or on footpaths. Even kids at primary schools!

Recently I saw a young student who pulled at his mask to put food in and put it back on!

2. However, a woman in her late 70s and her adult son - had three or more - now have discarded their masks. They still wore them in early 2023.

I wish them all the best - however, they have no excuses and I don't want to hear any sob stories anymore.

Expand full comment
author

As they say, Bogdan, even if you are not interested in politics, politics is still interested in you.

Expand full comment
Jun 27, 2023Liked by Andreas Oehler

Very droll ...

I am 100% interested in politics. However, I need to spend my time more wisely. There needs to be a balance.

However, I am willing to debate any policy pimp and pusher, if only they are game. That was why I sent over hundreds of emails to pollies. "experts", and hacks.

Expand full comment
author

Have you seen this, Bogdan? https://twitter.com/i/status/1674367947454943232

Expand full comment
Jul 1, 2023Liked by Andreas Oehler

No.

Thanks.

As I've said before, the time for talking is long over.

Expand full comment

The boosted being chased by the virus:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sIY7BQkbIT8

Expand full comment

Clearly the only logical solution is to create another jab! Despite the abject failure of all previous attempts, THIS one will work great!

Expand full comment
author
Jun 17, 2023·edited Jun 17, 2023Author

Remember that you've asked for it: https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/covid-boosters-fda-panel-recommends-new-xbb-shots-fall-rcna89331 "Pfizer said it could distribute reformulated doses as early as the end of July, depending on the strain selected."

Expand full comment
Jun 18, 2023Liked by Andreas Oehler

UFB

Expand full comment

・Unvaccinated

・Monovalent doses only

・Bivalent booster, 7-59 days earlier 1,627 144 (9) 33 (19-46) 27 (9-41)

・Bivalent booster, 60-119 days earlier 1,862 144 (8) 88 (74-104) 39 (24-51)

・Bivalent booster, 120-179 days earlier

Maybe it's just my eyes deceiving me, and I don't want to cast suspicions, but can anybody provide an explanation as to why there's no "Bivalent booster, 0-6 days earlier..." cohort?

Expand full comment
author

The 0-6 booster cohort is attributed to the unvaccinated, just to skew the stats a bit. Without that, it would've looked much worse for the boosters.

Expand full comment

Much like the suspicious lack of an "unknown" cohort either. From what I can tell, there should actually be 8 cohorts if the FDA is doing it's job:

・Unvaccinated

・Unknown (←missing, FDA slides don't account for cases that aren't "self-reported"?)

・Monovalent doses only

・Bivalent booster, 0-6 days earlier (←also conspicuously missing)

・Bivalent booster, 7-59 days earlier 1,627 144 (9) 33 (19-46) 27 (9-41)

・Bivalent booster, 60-119 days earlier 1,862 144 (8) 88 (74-104) 39 (24-51)

・Bivalent booster, 120-179 days earlier

・Bivalent booster, 180+ days earlier (←also conspicuously missing, although possibly omitted due to not enough samples? bivalent authorized 8/31/2022)

Expand full comment

Also, I find page 7 highly bizarre. They change/reduce the bivalent cohort to the following:

・Bivalent booster, 7-89 days earlier

・Bivalent booster, ≥90 days earlier (←They use the "≥" symbol here, but actually capped it at 115 days.)

Expand full comment

The CDC is stuck on stupid and so are the sheeple.

Expand full comment