22 Comments
User's avatar
Perry Simms's avatar

A doctor in USA claims that many jabbed patients admitted with covid were recorded as 'status unknown' which defaults to unjabbed.

This falsifies the statistics to make it looked like more unjabbed get sick.

Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

Good point. But even taking their own crooked data at face value, nothing adds up the way they want, LOL!

Expand full comment
Jlbcreation65's avatar

They were making these claims in my local newspaper as well and I posted a link in another substack asking for help to dispute but there were no takers.

I am not a mathematician but I know that there is no way those stats are correct.

Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

We are being gaslighted with full force to this day, in spite of all the evidence from around the world in terms of such stats about the "vaccines" effectiveness. It's hard to argue with complete nonsense - where do you start... Of course, even the data Health Canada presents is all messed up, as they go out of their way at every turn to paint their desired picture. If they kill people for a living, they wouldn't refrain from jigging a few numbers now and again to support their narrative, would they?

Expand full comment
Jlbcreation65's avatar

I totally agree. I just can't give up on trying to convince my loved ones that they have been lied to as their lives and fertility are at stake. So far, none of the real-life "evidence" all around them on a daily basis has caused them to even slightly start to question the narrative but I have to keep trying.

Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

All-around doesn't count unless it affects one directly. We should be thankful, then, for their blissful ignorance.

Expand full comment
Kirsten's avatar

Thanks for breaking this nonsense down! 👍🏽

Expand full comment
You are being lied to's avatar

Be aware of this:

https://vaccinesandmicroscopes.wordpress.com/

Expand full comment
LokiTrader's avatar

So the delta between 1 dose and 2 dose is roughly 3.33%... or put another way, 3.9% of people who got the first dose didn't get the second. This might be a good proxy estimate of the severe adverse event rate since the way this was being pushed, if you bought into the game you were getting 2 doses minimum. Are there many people who only got 1 without some sort of bad outcome to deter them from the second? There might be some natural deaths sprinkled in there as well.

Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

A brilliant observation!

Expand full comment
Irene The Insomniac's avatar

They still include “within 14 days of jab” in the unvaxxed group in this “study”? Or are these really unvaxxed? Ontario never clearly reported the data (while they were reporting).

Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

We know they know. They know we know they know. The beans will be spilled at some point.

Expand full comment
Pearl's avatar

So I'm assuming that the numbers up to Jul 31, 2022 include the data from the beginning of the vax program in Canada which I think was Dec 2020? Even in May of 2021 most of my elderly friends (70+), who did not live in a care home, had not received their first shot, and then, because there was still a shortage of vaccine, they could not get their second shot for 8 weeks. So the whole winter of 2021, and well into the summer, the majority of people were not vaccinated, but would be counted in these statistics. Great analysis of the month of August 2022 - so sad that Canadians are being so misled.

Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

Yes, they do. You can mislead some people some of the time. It seems they are on their last leg, jab-speaking. New horizons include energy crisis, food crisis, and nuclear winter.

Expand full comment
Moira Drosdovech's avatar

Exactly what I was thinking while reading the stats. Ultra deception.

Expand full comment
Grasshopper Kaplan's avatar

I believe whatever Justin fascist says, oh sure. Didn't he say you ain't considered to be vexed until weeks after injection?

Thanks

Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

This was Klaus's hand moving his lips.

Expand full comment
Jaye's avatar

So we know where Klaus's hand was...

Expand full comment
Datagal's avatar

Don’t forget that the % of population not jabbed in probably under-reported to make it look like a small fringe group. It’s more likely 20+%, which makes the jabs look worse.

Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

But the "deaths per hospitalization" rate isn't affected by that per se.

Expand full comment
Datagal's avatar

Correct.

Expand full comment
GAU8A's avatar

Just another small violation of the Nurnberger Kodex.

Expand full comment