Are they going to base your ability to insure and register a car on your being vaccinated?
Or require vaccination for a driver's license, white Christian citizens only of course, illegals exempted, minorities/LGBTQRS/green card/visa including expired/ISLAM/criminal/diplomat/felon/MAP (minor attracted persons) also exempted.
The lead author of that ridiculous study -- Donald Redelmeier -- appears to be a favorite of the Davos crowd. Here's an article at the WEF website that praises Redelmeier for his research proving the "peak-end rule": "people's memories of painful experiences are more positive if the painful activity ends in a mildly less painful manner, even if the overall discomfort is prolonged." It appears such "insights" were used as part of the Covid psyop -- slowly lessen the tyranny over time, and people are more willing to be bamboozled into a future "plandemic".
Problem is, he's right. People will be lead to believe they got their 'freedoms' back. It's total behaviour science quackery but it seems to have an effect on the masses.
The question is how do we counter it now that we're on to their scammy scandalous schemes?
By calling them out and attacking their messaging relentlessly and substantiatively.
On the other hand. One thing I have observed that shuts up covidian trolls on Twitter. Instead of presenting logical arguments and arguing about the merits with obvious brain-dead, turn personal right away: "I hope that you are up-to-date so we don't have to listen to you for much longer." Followed by "Sit back and relax" or "Rest in peace", or something to that effect. Tried it a dozen times or more, not a peep back.
Moonspinner, Thanks for pinning a name on this. These aren't faceless bots, they're flesh-and-blood monsters among us. They need to be named. (I'm another horrified Canadian.)
I may have already written this, so if I did, sorry, but according to commentator John Campbell (who bythe way has been red-pilled and announced on his Rumble channel that the injection campaign should be stopped or at least suspended), all deaths at the scene of a crash were EXCLUDED from the study. And a whopping 84% of the deaths during the month of the study were at the scene of the crash and therefore EXCLUDED from the study. Keep in mind that deaths at the scene are most likely to happen when a person died, fainted or had a cardiac incident while driving and that is what cause the accident. Here is the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAl7jHHuG9E&t=423s
John Campbell commented on this study. A couple of point I'll mention here is that the data was taken over one month but, as they all do, called those who were jabbed within 14 days of death as "unvaccinated," so half of the time period looked at was inaccurately counting "vaccinate" versus "unvaccinated." Also, according to Campbell, deaths at the scene were discounted (I didn't listen long enough to find out the supposed reason why, as I cannot stomach hearing this stupidity any more) and 84% of the deaths in the period looked at were deaths at the scene of the accident. Here is the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAl7jHHuG9E
LOL! Thank you for a laugh on a grey Vancouver morning! You can't make this sh*t up. And thanks, "evidence-based science", for showing us – in your desperation – what you really are. A cover for pharma.
The most interesting thing to me about this study was that the risk of COVID infection among the vaccinated was 4.1% while the risk of COVID infection among the unvaccinated was 3.5%.
It is also very interesting to me how the Canada Research Chair in Medical Decision Sciences, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Graduate Diploma in Health Research at the University of Toronto, and the National Sciences & Engineering Research Council of Canada all somehow managed to come through with the funds to investigate the hypothesis that younger, less wealthy and healthier people who drive more get into more traffic accidents than older, more wealthy and less healthy people who drive less, but somehow never considered funding the exact same sort of study to investigate which populations use hospitals more for health conditions associated with potential adverse effects of vaccines.
Why are these people so complicit in promoting ineffective mRNA vaccines & masking... in the first place and following reports of so many deaths and side effects in doing so?
But of course... it has always been about CONTROL!
See below; there's HOPE for all of us... people of the world (i.e., China is IMPLODING)!
While I enjoy our echo chamber at Substack, I would hope a) such people know about it and come read the responses to their work and b) are contacted by people here to remind them that we're smarter than they give us credit for.
I wish we could make them wake up; but three years into this it appears that they do it in their own time. Can't be forced. Unless you know some tricks! :-(
“Feeling overwhelmed by the news? You’re not alone. There’s a lot of information out there, and it’s hard to break it all down and digest it properly. That’s why I, Bill Gates, invented Liquifact — an easy-to-absorb formula that ensures you’re getting all the right facts.”
I'm now at the point I tend to view these studies as 'never interrupt your enemy while they're making a mistake'. They've overplayed their hands so many times people are just staring at them like freaks now.
Yep, what is next?
Are they going to base your ability to insure and register a car on your being vaccinated?
Or require vaccination for a driver's license, white Christian citizens only of course, illegals exempted, minorities/LGBTQRS/green card/visa including expired/ISLAM/criminal/diplomat/felon/MAP (minor attracted persons) also exempted.
Don't give them any ideas!
There are lies, damn lies, and then there are statistics. ~ Mark Twain
The prime example!
The prime minister, you wanted to say? It is from Disraeli, via Twain.
The lead author of that ridiculous study -- Donald Redelmeier -- appears to be a favorite of the Davos crowd. Here's an article at the WEF website that praises Redelmeier for his research proving the "peak-end rule": "people's memories of painful experiences are more positive if the painful activity ends in a mildly less painful manner, even if the overall discomfort is prolonged." It appears such "insights" were used as part of the Covid psyop -- slowly lessen the tyranny over time, and people are more willing to be bamboozled into a future "plandemic".
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/01/a-magic-pony-and-americas-unicorns-why-we-need-immigrants-to-spark-innovation-in-business-and-science/
Added to the post!
Huh. He's Canadian. So this is Canada's contribution to 'science', eh?
Man, this country is in worse shape than I thought.
It's QUACKSVILLE from Sunnybrook to McGill.
Problem is, he's right. People will be lead to believe they got their 'freedoms' back. It's total behaviour science quackery but it seems to have an effect on the masses.
The question is how do we counter it now that we're on to their scammy scandalous schemes?
By calling them out and attacking their messaging relentlessly and substantiatively.
On the other hand. One thing I have observed that shuts up covidian trolls on Twitter. Instead of presenting logical arguments and arguing about the merits with obvious brain-dead, turn personal right away: "I hope that you are up-to-date so we don't have to listen to you for much longer." Followed by "Sit back and relax" or "Rest in peace", or something to that effect. Tried it a dozen times or more, not a peep back.
Lol.
Moonspinner, Thanks for pinning a name on this. These aren't faceless bots, they're flesh-and-blood monsters among us. They need to be named. (I'm another horrified Canadian.)
Follow The Science! 😎😎😎
Mrs. Andruk, 4th grade teacher , would have taken out "Mr. Bang" A 12 by 1 by 2 ruler out on these folks.
They are mocking us
They made sure to eliminate Mrs. Andruk way before when.
That old bitch will never die. I developed seizures with her terrorizing us😎😎😎
I peek out window still.
Covid state has nothing on her!
Mrs. Andruk sounds like the nuns at my Catholic school!
🤣
We were (still are) terrified of them, but they turned out to be excellent teachers. I am grateful for all the lessons they taught me.
My nuns were good, except on religion... They swallowed Vatican II heresies
They are desparate, grasping lol
And yet, finding new creative ways. Things like this in Dec. 2022?! They are seriously late to the party.
I may have already written this, so if I did, sorry, but according to commentator John Campbell (who bythe way has been red-pilled and announced on his Rumble channel that the injection campaign should be stopped or at least suspended), all deaths at the scene of a crash were EXCLUDED from the study. And a whopping 84% of the deaths during the month of the study were at the scene of the crash and therefore EXCLUDED from the study. Keep in mind that deaths at the scene are most likely to happen when a person died, fainted or had a cardiac incident while driving and that is what cause the accident. Here is the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAl7jHHuG9E&t=423s
Thanks, that's the best explanation of the man behind the curtain! Added to the post!
John Campbell commented on this study. A couple of point I'll mention here is that the data was taken over one month but, as they all do, called those who were jabbed within 14 days of death as "unvaccinated," so half of the time period looked at was inaccurately counting "vaccinate" versus "unvaccinated." Also, according to Campbell, deaths at the scene were discounted (I didn't listen long enough to find out the supposed reason why, as I cannot stomach hearing this stupidity any more) and 84% of the deaths in the period looked at were deaths at the scene of the accident. Here is the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAl7jHHuG9E
LOL! Thank you for a laugh on a grey Vancouver morning! You can't make this sh*t up. And thanks, "evidence-based science", for showing us – in your desperation – what you really are. A cover for pharma.
The most interesting thing to me about this study was that the risk of COVID infection among the vaccinated was 4.1% while the risk of COVID infection among the unvaccinated was 3.5%.
It is also very interesting to me how the Canada Research Chair in Medical Decision Sciences, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Graduate Diploma in Health Research at the University of Toronto, and the National Sciences & Engineering Research Council of Canada all somehow managed to come through with the funds to investigate the hypothesis that younger, less wealthy and healthier people who drive more get into more traffic accidents than older, more wealthy and less healthy people who drive less, but somehow never considered funding the exact same sort of study to investigate which populations use hospitals more for health conditions associated with potential adverse effects of vaccines.
Good eye! Yeah, the have their priorities right, NOT!
But I thought it was climate?
This is quite a find. We can see how dangerous kicking around the recent pop label of mass- blah blah-psychoses could potentially be.
Why are these people so complicit in promoting ineffective mRNA vaccines & masking... in the first place and following reports of so many deaths and side effects in doing so?
But of course... it has always been about CONTROL!
See below; there's HOPE for all of us... people of the world (i.e., China is IMPLODING)!
https://stopworldcontrol.com/china/?inf_contact_key=83deae7ed085fcd10387fc44765fd605d18a532c4142cb79caf2b269de1401fa
https://lists.youmaker.com/links/718ZA7FW0/QgV5OrnJx/QAk5xjSLN4/ffS0mocrk
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/central-bank-digital-currencies-cbdcs?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=37889&post_id=90648889&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email
While I enjoy our echo chamber at Substack, I would hope a) such people know about it and come read the responses to their work and b) are contacted by people here to remind them that we're smarter than they give us credit for.
I wish we could make them wake up; but three years into this it appears that they do it in their own time. Can't be forced. Unless you know some tricks! :-(
Do you know Igor ? Lots of notes to compare with this one .
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/the-unvaccinated-had-more-car-crashes?utm_source=email-ufi&utm_medium=email
Love his blog
“Feeling overwhelmed by the news? You’re not alone. There’s a lot of information out there, and it’s hard to break it all down and digest it properly. That’s why I, Bill Gates, invented Liquifact — an easy-to-absorb formula that ensures you’re getting all the right facts.”
https://newworldhumor.substack.com/p/liquifact-daily-facts-in-a-bottle
I believe a suppository formulation would be more appropriate.
I'm now at the point I tend to view these studies as 'never interrupt your enemy while they're making a mistake'. They've overplayed their hands so many times people are just staring at them like freaks now.
We do, covidians find comfort.