Even their fact check says "mostly false" about the vax impairing the immune system. Hmmm, this is so unlike the fact checkers. Where's their joy in squashing the spirit of science? I wonder what's wrong... depression, maybe there was a death in the family and they lost the exuberance to mislead the public. 🤔
I think I would like to read the study again. The point this fact check is relying on is that there are more possible things at play and the fact check is about any certainty of claiming
That the vaccines result in less immunity following exposure . I think the study does demonstrate that there is less N antibodies developed in vaccinated individuals then unvaccinated . It’s widely known for decades that exposure to the wild pathogen results in more robust immunity , but a finding that being jabbed results in less robust immunity ( in way of testing for N ) when subsequently exposed is still a bombshell result . Does it need more corroboration with further studies ? Of course it does . It is not something to simply
Ignore and call “ mostly false” because there is more to study and confirm and there are confounders .
it doesnt SEEM like they were totally truthful
Even their fact check says "mostly false" about the vax impairing the immune system. Hmmm, this is so unlike the fact checkers. Where's their joy in squashing the spirit of science? I wonder what's wrong... depression, maybe there was a death in the family and they lost the exuberance to mislead the public. 🤔
Sounds like they want it both ways or as we used to say baffle them with b*ll sh*t
Facts are how things seem, right?
Whoa.
I think I would like to read the study again. The point this fact check is relying on is that there are more possible things at play and the fact check is about any certainty of claiming
That the vaccines result in less immunity following exposure . I think the study does demonstrate that there is less N antibodies developed in vaccinated individuals then unvaccinated . It’s widely known for decades that exposure to the wild pathogen results in more robust immunity , but a finding that being jabbed results in less robust immunity ( in way of testing for N ) when subsequently exposed is still a bombshell result . Does it need more corroboration with further studies ? Of course it does . It is not something to simply
Ignore and call “ mostly false” because there is more to study and confirm and there are confounders .
I would say the claim is “ mostly true”.
"𝘋𝘰 𝘮𝘙𝘕𝘈 𝘊𝘰𝘷𝘪𝘥 𝘷𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘪𝘳 𝘭𝘰𝘯𝘨-𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘮 𝘪𝘮𝘮𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘺?
𝘐𝘵 𝘥𝘰𝘦𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘴𝘦𝘦𝘮 𝘴𝘰.
𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘢𝘥𝘮𝘪𝘵! 𝘉𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘸𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴:":
Not sure what they're admitting to there. They're trying to deny that vaccines impair immunity.