The vaccine companies used to send each destination the same lot, but when a bad lot killed or injured a lot of people at the same place, it was pretty noticeable. So they started mixing up the lots; no one at each location would notice, and they could just say "really bad luck -- just one in a million". Sounds like they did the same for covid.
There is a 1979 Wyeth memo on DPT, where a "hot lot" caused SIDS, and management OK'ed not sending too many vials from each lot to the same location: http://whale.to/c/olmsted_on_autism1979.html
I don't know if this is standard practice, but suspect so -- it makes good business sense. One way to check would be to talk with pediatricians, ask about lot numbers for their stock. If you can get any to talk :-)
BTW, Dan Olmsted was a first-rate investigative reporter, a senior UPI editor. He got involved in vaccines when he noticed that the Amish had very low autism rates and very low vax rates. He co-authored a couple of excellent books, in particular The Age of Autism and Denial: How Refusing to Face the Facts about Our Autism Epidemic Hurts Children, Families, and Our Future
If this is true, and the vaccine manufacturers deliberately mix lots in any received batch, then how can anyone have determined whether or not most of the adverse events are attributable to specific lots?
I have to day, on it's face I don't believe that the vaccine is only dangerous in certain lots. I believe these covid vaccines are inherently dangerous and that this is likely a distraction inserted by those who don't want to face the greater consequences of putting out a rushed technology that kills.
I should add, the reason I believe they are inherently dangerous, is because serious adverse events were seen during the trials, and quietly excluded from the final report.
The vaccine companies used to send each destination the same lot, but when a bad lot killed or injured a lot of people at the same place, it was pretty noticeable. So they started mixing up the lots; no one at each location would notice, and they could just say "really bad luck -- just one in a million". Sounds like they did the same for covid.
Do you have any sources for this insight? I am pursuing leads in this direction now.
There is a 1979 Wyeth memo on DPT, where a "hot lot" caused SIDS, and management OK'ed not sending too many vials from each lot to the same location: http://whale.to/c/olmsted_on_autism1979.html
I don't know if this is standard practice, but suspect so -- it makes good business sense. One way to check would be to talk with pediatricians, ask about lot numbers for their stock. If you can get any to talk :-)
I'll see if I can get any more info...
Thanks!
BTW, Dan Olmsted was a first-rate investigative reporter, a senior UPI editor. He got involved in vaccines when he noticed that the Amish had very low autism rates and very low vax rates. He co-authored a couple of excellent books, in particular The Age of Autism and Denial: How Refusing to Face the Facts about Our Autism Epidemic Hurts Children, Families, and Our Future
If this is true, and the vaccine manufacturers deliberately mix lots in any received batch, then how can anyone have determined whether or not most of the adverse events are attributable to specific lots?
lot number is reported in the VAERS database
I have to day, on it's face I don't believe that the vaccine is only dangerous in certain lots. I believe these covid vaccines are inherently dangerous and that this is likely a distraction inserted by those who don't want to face the greater consequences of putting out a rushed technology that kills.
I should add, the reason I believe they are inherently dangerous, is because serious adverse events were seen during the trials, and quietly excluded from the final report.
Check out the movie 1986 The Act - it details how vaccine manufacturers have been disguising hot lots since 1979
Great expansion and confirmation from Karl Denninger, https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244109
He confirms that each hot lot was widely distributed, not just to one location.
Partial facts may lead to wrong conclusions: https://live2fightanotherday.substack.com/p/exposing-the-expose-in-good-way
Thank you for alerting us to this breaking news.