42 Comments

Very good Andreas. I am glad you can supply so many details of what is going on. I just wrote a piece that simplifies for me the totality of our covid troubles. Here it is for what it is worth.

We can look at what we know (or don’t know) about the so-called pandemic and make some judgments about what has happened and from that I will suggest some deductions about the totality of covid.

(1) The virus was likely made in a lab and intentionally or by mistake was let out and people started contracting it.

(2) The virus was never a terrible killer. Most of us didn’t know how bad it was initially, but if we had used good data collection with transparent reporting we would have known how bad it was quite quickly and made prudent decisions on its treatment.

(3) We could have protected as well as we could those who were vulnerable. Not by isolating them unnecessarily, they could have made an educated choice about whether they wanted to see people or not. Everybody else would have contracted the virus (or not) and had varying levels of symptoms but almost all of them would survive and be immune now.

(4) There are pockets of places where common inexpensive drugs were used to lesson the effects of the virus. If they were allowed to be used everywhere many reactions and deaths would have been averted, as well as putting less people in the hospitals.

(5) Vaccines were created in a timeline that was too fast for proper testing. Little information was given about the vaccines. The Pharma companies selling them are making a tremendous amount of money and they have no liability for harm coming from the vaccines. The vaccines proved not to work as a vaccine should. There are many more adverse affects from the covid vaccine than from any other vaccine ever.

(6) There was never informed consent to take this vaccine, as no one yet knows the total effect of the vaccine.

(7) There was a lot of fear projected to the masses by the political, medical, and media organizations but the actual overburdening of hospitals was much smaller than predicted and in some places there was no overburdening.

(8) The rest of it, the masking, the physical distancing and the vaccine mandates were a byproduct of the frenzy and not the virus itself. They were almost all totally unnecessary. Possibly some masking and physical distancing could have been practiced if it proved to be warranted. There is no way to know, as our medical superiors did not test these if a proper scientific way.

These are the simple bare bones facts we know. Now we can make a deduction based on this evidence.

Seeing all the missteps and inanities in the treatment and protocols of the virus and the non-science, misdirection and obfuscation in the use of the vaccine we could surmise that everyone involved, the drug manufacturers, the medical experts assigned by the government, and the politicians are all incredibly stupid.

Or, we deduct that the people responsible are very smart and the virus and vaccines are doing exactly what they are designed to do. I will call these people the cabal.

For this plan to work the cabal knew that the virus couldn’t be an indiscriminate killer as then the cabal might be in danger of contracting it themselves. The virus was the reason for the use of the vaccine. The makeup of the vaccine is furthering the goals of the cabal.

So what is the overall plan of the cabal? As they are extremely secretive we can only take some guesses. From my reading I have seen some intelligent theories emerge. These are;

(a) the vaccines will kill of a lot of people,

(b) receivers are embedded in the vaccine so the populace can be tracked easily,

(c) usher in a vaccine passport that can be later manipulated into any form the cabal would like,

(d) and decimate the financial stability of the world so that the cabal can more easily manipulate the populace.

https://nikontim.substack.com

Expand full comment
author

All of the above and more, IMHO. Time for us to get tough with them.

Expand full comment

Yes.

Expand full comment
author

Have just dug into a new information trough on the subject. Scary and eye-opening! Now multiple mandatory jabs make total sense. Will have a new post tomorrow.

Expand full comment
Dec 29, 2021·edited Dec 29, 2021Liked by Andreas Oehler

When they believe they have no soul,

it is with great and pleasurable ease

to feast upon your flesh still whole

with a smile like a grimacing disease.

Onward they march more cruelly bold!

How many more to get fatally sick?

In fine print hidden truth be told

of their final needle prick.

Scorched earth omelettes be damned!

Millions more eggs must be broken

at the altar of a world too crammed

with those about to be woken...

Expand full comment
Dec 29, 2021Liked by Andreas Oehler

Nice work! A good reference list to share!

Especially appreciate the lead to Dr. James Hill, and to learn Dr. David Martin's answer to "Why Does Trump Push the Jab".

Expand full comment
author

Good information now comes in like an avalanche - the tipping point has been reached. Hopefully this new awareness will lead to an effective counterresponse.

Expand full comment
Dec 30, 2021Liked by Andreas Oehler

Great post. It seems there are 2 narratives: one proposed motive for the COVID hoax is a long-standing depopulation plan (by 2030); the 2nd narrative is the current economy is collapsing so they're trying to ensure they retain their wealth and power. Perhaps both narratives are true- there may be competing factions among the oligarchs.

Here's a fascinating summary of La Quinta Columna's research into Graphene Oxide. Is it possible the spike protein is fake and GO is the real cause of COVID and vaccine adverse effects? I'm open to this idea because the magnetic arms after vaccination seems to be real in some people.

https://rumble.com/vri3uf-thumbnail-233-nanotechnology-identified-in-vaccines-composition-and-purpose.html

Expand full comment
author

It’s not collapsing - it has been run into ground by them. 1929 didn’t just happen too . The result was the war on gold standard. Now it will be the war on fiat currencies. And population control through technical and biological means. Hopefully they went too far this time, and from the wrong end. Should have started with the 2nd amendment, me thinks.

Expand full comment
Mar 6, 2022·edited Mar 6, 2022Liked by Andreas Oehler

Correct. The US "economy" is being systematically looted and destroyed. According to Catherine Austin Fitts, this most recent plundering began in the late 1990s.

Expand full comment
Dec 30, 2021Liked by Andreas Oehler

Yes, let's pray they bit off more than they can chew and the unintended consequences will be their downfall. There's been speculation of a fake alien invasion or a cyberattack coming next. A real global supply chain collapse might be what comes instead:

https://dailyreckoning.com/globalisms-achilles-heel/

https://dailyreckoning.com/the-great-supply-chain-collapse/

Expand full comment
author

Thanks for the link!

Expand full comment

Yup

About ten years ago the big push to get rid of cash hit

Ain't that the shit?

Conveniently now the Covidope got folks thinking cash is dirty

Actually that is probably a good thing spread those viruses

Viruganda bad thing

Cash money good thing

Filthy greed bad

Murder is also illegal, funny that

Had we forget?

Lest we proceed to child sacrifice...

Ah, too late

Expand full comment

People will have nothing and be happy.

Expand full comment
author

At least that’s the plan. For those still around.

Expand full comment
Dec 29, 2021Liked by Andreas Oehler

There is always the removal of the unhappy clause to help ensure everyone is ensured happiness

Expand full comment

They know the people better then anyone. Spirit is likely the only hope. Power of intent and intentionality. Inculcate the phenomenon

Expand full comment

Makes me think of the book The Road. Except for the happy part.

Expand full comment

"Going for Jugular Take 2 - All Bats in Row"

or

"Going for Jugular Take 2 - All Coronaviruses in Row"

or

"Going for Jugular Take 2 - All Scams in Row"

or

"Going for Jugular Take 2 - All Vaxes in Row"

Expand full comment
author

Not only vaxx! So, all scams.

Expand full comment

If with the first part on Marx, Kant and Putin you're trying to explain why Russia is going along with these plans it's not necessary and it's not substantive. Russia has been owned by Wall Street since the dismemberment of the Soviet Union, prior to this the Soviet Union was an existential threat to the cabal.

You should have started this article with an essay on Malthusianism, because that's what all of this is. Marx and Engels for their part vehemently opposed Malthus, he was probably the intellectual they hated the most.

Otherwise, very good article.

Expand full comment
author

Thanks for the tip. I'll look into it. So, by saying " Soviet Union was an existential threat to the cabal", you mean this pet project of theirs went rogue some time after 1917?

Expand full comment

The Germans let Lenin loose on Russia so he could destabilize the Tsar's regime, chances are they funded him too but they were never able to control him nor expected to. Trotsky was funded by Wall Street and they never lost control of him. Lenin worked with everyone he could to make revolution. However there were many wreckers and people who were working with the enemy. Trotsky being the main one. Lenin wanted to do things slow and wait for Germany to have a revolution, he instituted the NEP to get economic cooperation with foreign nations, not unlike China did since the 70s. When Lenin died and Stalin took power he was the most hardline and uncorrupted communist. He immediately went to war within the Soviet Union and purged all the controlled elements in the party and the parties enemies. Trotsky was kicked out of the party considered to be an agent of Wall Street and working with the Nazis and was hunted down and killed in South America.

When Stalin died Kruschev took power and turned back many of the gains made by Stalin. The late Stalin to Kruschev period was the golden age but with the passing of Stalin the national bourgeoisie were to make a come back.

My assessment is Stalin and Lenin were not controlled but Trotsky and Kruschev were controlled. The national bourgeoisie in Russia slowly regained power between Kruschev and Gorbachev and by the time Gorbachev started Glasnot and Perestroika the Soviet Union was already being sold out to foreign powers. Yeltsin was a literal alcoholic installed by Wall Street to institute the break up of the Soviet Union in the interest of the Russian nationalists who ended up becoming the oligarchs, this plunged the region into poverty.

So from the start the Cabal had Trotsky as their agent in the Soviet Union but that's about it. They never expected the Soviet Union to win, they just wanted Germany and Russia to go to war. The basic geopolitical perspective of the atlanticists is to maintain global hegemony through naval power while not allowing for the emergence of a land power. A land power in Eurasia they predict would result from an alliance between either Germany and Russia (their nightmare scenario) or China and Russia. They refer to this as the geographical pivot of history and it was first expounded by Halford Mackinder, commented and held by Kissinger and generally carried through by Zbigniew Brzezinski. You can also watch lectures by John Mearsheimer on this topic.

Expand full comment
author
Feb 14, 2022·edited Feb 14, 2022Author

Trotsky was the instigator of terror. Lenin was same. So was Stalin. Did you read Lenin's calls to bloody terror, against this enemy or that enemy, this "class" or "that class" of society? No? I did. No Mr. Nice among them or a good bone in their bodies. Not that Russia didn't go rogue on them. They were hell bent on the world revolution on their terms. Hence the globe on their banners - Mr. Global the Russian way. But they were still helped out by the Western Cabal whenever they got themselves into trouble. Including George H. Bush coming to Kyiv and telling Ukrainians to stick with Soviet Union in 91? https://www.quora.com/What-was-the-Ukrainian-reaction-when-US-President-George-H-W-Bush-went-to-Kiev-for-a-speech-and-made-a-reference-suggesting-that-Ukrainians-should-vote-against-absolute-independence-from-the-Soviet-Union

Expand full comment

How I see the speech by Bush is that independent Ukraine was still going to be a communist nation. Therefore he wants to entice them with protection from the US if they abandon communism. In their double speak when he says democracy he means liberal electoral capitalist republic. This is the policy they pursued for all of Eastern Europe following the end of the Soviet Union, by persuasion in this case or by force and clandestine means in the case of Yugoslavia.

Expand full comment
author

Eastern Europe couldn't wait to drop communism. You would too if you were made to live there.

Expand full comment

I wasn't saying that they didn't engage in terror nor that they weren't all for terror (Lenin, Stalin and Trotsky). They all were. I was saying that the funding of Trotsky didn't define the Soviet Unions orientation as one with the cabal. They used Trotsky and others to destabilize things and sow paranoia that led to the civil war known as the great terror. They needed to use subversion simply because they weren't in control of the Soviet Union. Their plans ended up working and by 91 the Soviet Union was already in the power of the cabal which is why they were able to disband it. I'm not sure what the geopolitical machinations with Ukraine would have been at that time but I see it as being consistent with my perspective.

As an aside, I personally don't see why people have a problem with globalism. It seems to me being against globalism, in favour of say nations, in the modern day is like having been against federal unions in favour of states - something that will come to be seen as irrelevant. The issue is not the total amount of territory integrated into our political organizations but whether we maintain our freedom and this can only be done by bringing back forms of real democracy (which I don't think exists anywhere in the world today, Switzerland being perhaps the closest thing we have). I would probably be more free in a tribal village but that's the last thing I want.

Expand full comment
author
Feb 15, 2022·edited Feb 15, 2022Author

Switzerland is in a pretty pickle now. I listen to them often (srf.ch - audio), visited too, until the travel ban in Canada, observed their media follow in the footsteps of BBC and CBC, and CNN. Banned comments completely on srf.ch after 2020, now allowing back on very neutral topics, the comments were severely censored even before 2020. Brainwashing them day and night. All other larger Swiss media outlets - same. To the point that most larger cities are woke now. One more generation on that road and they are toast. Their direct democracy is being ignored (the important referenda results sabotaged by the gov't via abortive implementations) but still the biggest thorn in EU's side and in its crosshairs. Their "tribal villages" are the best part of Switzerland, true, those will resist to the end. The cities - not so much.

Expand full comment
Feb 15, 2022Liked by Andreas Oehler

Wait what do you mean, was the referendum on the covid pass sabotaged? I didn't hear about this. I thought they had just been propagandized so badly they didn't know up from down.

Expand full comment
author
Feb 15, 2022·edited Feb 15, 2022Author

I have a problem with globalism. As with central bank(s), and global corporations. Look where they lead us. It's the ultimate centralization. Soylent Green for all, no choices, no voices, no representation, no influence. "Go away and die" - is the last and most important command. Orwell missed that one.

Expand full comment

It’s hard to argue with labor redundancy. With big tech human labor is risky and replaceable with machines. So there is this idea of provide welfare in a basic income , so people don’t need to work for survival basics . But then they can just have more time to reproduce and continue to be a social cost, and keeping them healthy enough to limit the pressure on the hospitals . So it becomes necessary to have population control. The people can also become violent and turn on those in power .

All things point to the necessity of population control by those in ultimate power . Direct access to the metabolism through substance injection is the perfect mechanism to control the population . Under the power of social betterment is the best approach and “vaccine good” is way.

It’s likely better at this time to just be injecting large portions of the population that are not at risk with saline , and managing the outcomes with the vulnerable to demonstrate effectively and ensure policy. Because the policy and further branding of the “vaccine good” social Justice narrative . The event needs to be significant enough to have historical precedence . With mandatory injections bi annually instituted in key zones population control can be executed and ensure a future of power and advancement of a few .

The question is of the wild . What necessity is there to ensure a wild zone ? Where populations are free to exist without interruption. But they must also be limited in technology and power. Seems very Brave New World.

It’s been confounding for some years now and it’s been quite hard to navigate as a commoner .

Expand full comment

The potential for fake vaccines is possible when the shots are not followed up with any kind of confirmation of effect of antibody development . I noticed here in Canada that the medical system was dissuading people from getting antibody testing , especially those that got the shots. This might be indicative of the distribution of fake vaccines. Another sign would be data that ultimately shows no change in outcomes from pre pandemic years .

Expand full comment
author

Don't count on it. The Russian roulette is a losing proposition, in the long run.

Expand full comment

It's beyond that. Look at Dr David Martin's presentation on https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/dr-david-martin-who-they-are-the-names-and-faces-of-the-people-who-are-killing-humanity

There's a few names left out.

Expand full comment
author

I have mentioned that in previous posts. You know the common denominator of those folks? Links to WEF.

Expand full comment
Jan 1, 2022Liked by Andreas Oehler

It's really ruining my enjoyment of Yo-Yo Ma's cello performances.

Expand full comment

Quite a few! In fact, one could say the biggest fish, with zero visibility and no name recognition.

Expand full comment

Wonderful stuff, AO. Echos my every suspicion and conclusion over the last two years.

With regard to "Putting The Proles Back to Sleep" and "The Next Step for The WEF," what, pray tell, of events ongoing in (the) Ukraine? Is this a blow against The West actually a blow against The Cabal?

Expand full comment
deletedMay 28, 2022·edited May 28, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
author

I think they do it in the open - the gall of it is supposed to make us reject the possibility, or become resigned to the inevitable. There aren't too many fake bottoms in this "suitcase". They have owned the world clandestinely for centuries, they finally figured the way to make it overt and rearrange the furniture in the house they now fully own. Or so they think.

Expand full comment
author
May 28, 2022·edited May 28, 2022Author

Also, that is how masons operate - in your face. So that you do not complain you were not notified. Works kinda like "informed consent", in their folklore. It is part of their "ritual". That is also why the Microsoft patent number is 060606, among many other things.

Expand full comment