48 Comments
Jun 22, 2022Liked by Andreas Oehler

This makes my blood boil. I am thankful for your posts and those of other fact reporters. It's criminal that the media refuses to be truthful about this horrible toxic crap. With the desired result of too many people blindly complying to hurt if not kill themselves and their children. Really who does this benefit?

Expand full comment

So now we enter the stage where finally the lackluster “elites” know we know and are going to have to - in one way or another - face the music?

Expand full comment

There may be three phases to "knowing". First, the regulators knew the trial data which could not have incuded those categories of people who were expressly excluded (pregnant women, elderly, frail, immuno-compromised, babies, and such). Yet they rushed to administer the shots to the elderly and soon down the line to the very young and, now, the youngest. The trial data did not have the power to ascertain risks to people of childbearing age as per the small sample who became pregnant during the trials; and as per the brevity of the trials before unblinding.

Second phase might be the period during which the regulators, and healtch care providers, knew of adverse injuries, incuding deaths, that came from the early months of the shot programs around the world; hugely significant safety signals appeared but were disregarded.

Third phase begins around about mid-summer 2022. There is just so much evidence of ineffectiveness and lack of safety that all norms are challenged by the continuation and the expansion of the shot programs.

Now each of these phases would have details that were available to those with greater access to the data and had the obligation to provide analysis of that data. There is that duty to know also, among the public servants, incuding elected politicians, who sponsors the promotion of these shots both with taxpayer funding and with loud and urgent and persistent propaganda.

Sometimes there are people who became skeptical, bit by bit, until they reached a startling conclusion about some aspect of the efficacy and/or safety of the C19 shots. For example, some doctors jumped on the bandwagon because ... pro-vax bias ... and also got the shots themselves. Then, during the second phase became vocally concerned and advocated greater caution if not outright rejection regarding the shots. By now, those doctors would be digging into the greater body of evidence and bringing more and more pubic attention to the first two phases. But doctors are not the only nor even the best example. Consider those parents who got the shots and then, perhaps during phase two, realized that their teenaged kids, or college aged children, were being coerced openly by authorities; while the parents might have thought it safer to get shots themselves, they were also subjected to coercion in many places regarding their livelihoods. So they had a bad taste of covidmania by that point; the third and fourth shots probally moved them to the skeptical side of the aisle. Seeing people sick -- even getting C19 symptoms or test results -- convinced many that this was a farce. And now, parents who have seen the coercion regarding K-12 in schools but also in sports and other activities, will have become more aware of the unfairness being promoted in the name of public health. The third phase is front and center as babies are being brought into the shot campaigns.

I DO THINK that the third phase, and going forward, will open very many authorities to criminal investigations because the duty of care, the duty to know better, to obligation to protect actually has begun to run against covidmania notions of protection. Reasonable precaution is a fact-based assertion and that can not withstand scrutiny at this moment and going forward.

The first and second phases may present greater challenges to bring forth criminal investigations of ordinary people who jumped on the band wagon of these C19 shots. But for those phases we can count on lots of strong evidence to bring investigations and charges against regulators and decisions-makers in government, incuding elected poiticians.

The chart and the reports in this substack, now, this summer, have set the stage for phase three. Each and every conscientious reader needs to do his or her part in gathering evidence locally and close to home. Those in authority need to be put on notice and brought under scrutiny. Their duties and obligations mean that if they are negligent they will be found guilty; and if they continued knowingly, out of some odd sense of loyalty to a political agenda or out of fear of being found out, then, their crimes will be subject to much harsher scrutiny and penalty.

Expand full comment
Jun 23, 2022Liked by Andreas Oehler

The DailyExpose is on my daily reading list.

Expand full comment

Falsehood, meet reality. Quackcination does not improve health outcomes. What we have is a pandemic of belief in preventing chronic illness through quackcination that is failing miserably. This falsehood is preventing attention being placed on the real causes which can only be dealt with by public health agencies with encouraging better nutrition and lifestyle habits. It cannot be forced with dangerous and ineffective medical interventions as is being made plain for all to see.

Expand full comment

How many times do we have to say, "Bueller? Bueller?"

It's a COOKBOOK!!!!!!!!

Expand full comment

Thinking of my family in Canada and praying for them. This is the single most important video I have watched in my lifetime. I hope it will be shared. - https://leemuller.substack.com/p/single-most-important-video-to-watch

Expand full comment

Trudeau can EAT MY SHIT and after that I’d love to kick him in the nuts. He is the most despised POS in Canadastan

Expand full comment

drjohnsblog.substack.com

Medical Vitamin-D expert, David Grimes MD has been sorting through Canadian government health statistics, which are cumulative.

He substacted the totals from the week of 4/10/22 from the week of 4/17/22 and found this information about COVID deaths for that week.​

​ ​Covid-19 deaths among the unvaccinated increased from 9511 to 9512, an increase during the week of just one.

Only 1 of the 227 Covid-19 deaths was a person who had not been vaccinated. Let this true but unpublicised fact sink in.

http://www.drdavidgrimes.com/

Expand full comment

whats the matter with this man ... how many times has he gotten covid ??

was he really vaxxed ?? boosted ??? still getting it ??

dont know what to say ...

Expand full comment

And while suppressing and denying treatment .

Expand full comment

That bar graph doesn’t match the numbers. The data in the table matches the website, but the bar graph shows 15% unvaxxed hospitalization but it’s 53.2% unvaxxed hospitalization & death (it’s odd that the percentage for both is identical). Percentage found in table 2. The bar graphs on their page don’t match the bar graphs on Canada’s website. Someone really messed up. The unvaxxed percentages are higher on both deaths & hospitalization- but it’s 52.3 vs 42.6 with 4% “unprotected”. That’s not success. But the bar graph from Expose doesn’t match any data from the government page.

Expand full comment

It doesn't look to me like the title, chart, and table are consistent with each other. Additionally without a normalization by size of each group there is no way to interpret the information.

Expand full comment
deletedJun 22, 2022·edited Jun 22, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment