This makes my blood boil. I am thankful for your posts and those of other fact reporters. It's criminal that the media refuses to be truthful about this horrible toxic crap. With the desired result of too many people blindly complying to hurt if not kill themselves and their children. Really who does this benefit?
There may be three phases to "knowing". First, the regulators knew the trial data which could not have incuded those categories of people who were expressly excluded (pregnant women, elderly, frail, immuno-compromised, babies, and such). Yet they rushed to administer the shots to the elderly and soon down the line to the very young and, now, the youngest. The trial data did not have the power to ascertain risks to people of childbearing age as per the small sample who became pregnant during the trials; and as per the brevity of the trials before unblinding.
Second phase might be the period during which the regulators, and healtch care providers, knew of adverse injuries, incuding deaths, that came from the early months of the shot programs around the world; hugely significant safety signals appeared but were disregarded.
Third phase begins around about mid-summer 2022. There is just so much evidence of ineffectiveness and lack of safety that all norms are challenged by the continuation and the expansion of the shot programs.
Now each of these phases would have details that were available to those with greater access to the data and had the obligation to provide analysis of that data. There is that duty to know also, among the public servants, incuding elected politicians, who sponsors the promotion of these shots both with taxpayer funding and with loud and urgent and persistent propaganda.
Sometimes there are people who became skeptical, bit by bit, until they reached a startling conclusion about some aspect of the efficacy and/or safety of the C19 shots. For example, some doctors jumped on the bandwagon because ... pro-vax bias ... and also got the shots themselves. Then, during the second phase became vocally concerned and advocated greater caution if not outright rejection regarding the shots. By now, those doctors would be digging into the greater body of evidence and bringing more and more pubic attention to the first two phases. But doctors are not the only nor even the best example. Consider those parents who got the shots and then, perhaps during phase two, realized that their teenaged kids, or college aged children, were being coerced openly by authorities; while the parents might have thought it safer to get shots themselves, they were also subjected to coercion in many places regarding their livelihoods. So they had a bad taste of covidmania by that point; the third and fourth shots probally moved them to the skeptical side of the aisle. Seeing people sick -- even getting C19 symptoms or test results -- convinced many that this was a farce. And now, parents who have seen the coercion regarding K-12 in schools but also in sports and other activities, will have become more aware of the unfairness being promoted in the name of public health. The third phase is front and center as babies are being brought into the shot campaigns.
I DO THINK that the third phase, and going forward, will open very many authorities to criminal investigations because the duty of care, the duty to know better, to obligation to protect actually has begun to run against covidmania notions of protection. Reasonable precaution is a fact-based assertion and that can not withstand scrutiny at this moment and going forward.
The first and second phases may present greater challenges to bring forth criminal investigations of ordinary people who jumped on the band wagon of these C19 shots. But for those phases we can count on lots of strong evidence to bring investigations and charges against regulators and decisions-makers in government, incuding elected poiticians.
The chart and the reports in this substack, now, this summer, have set the stage for phase three. Each and every conscientious reader needs to do his or her part in gathering evidence locally and close to home. Those in authority need to be put on notice and brought under scrutiny. Their duties and obligations mean that if they are negligent they will be found guilty; and if they continued knowingly, out of some odd sense of loyalty to a political agenda or out of fear of being found out, then, their crimes will be subject to much harsher scrutiny and penalty.
The more they know the more they can not deny having cause to query the Shot program. LOCAL authorities. Document their written policies and their conduct. Inform them of what is now in plain sight. Let them know you know. Usually they will defend their actions, promote their actions, and stand by those actions -- if recent history is any basis for short term future. They will readily restate coz they think its right. Those who become doubtful will say so and act accordingingly. Then gather the evidence as events unfold in your home turf. This is how change will happen, if it does, and how it can become more than superficial tinkering -- like ending/ banning restrictions instead of temporarily suspending. Let's encourage all substack authors to promote this and to show how it can be done. Commenters can bring their examples and this creates a forum in which documentation is modelled and archived. For example: start a weekly or monthly open thread for this purpose.
I owe my audience a follow-up post on "Mass Formation-> Mass Psychosis-> Mass Delusion -> Mass Atrocities". This idea fits nicely in there. In a day or two.
Falsehood, meet reality. Quackcination does not improve health outcomes. What we have is a pandemic of belief in preventing chronic illness through quackcination that is failing miserably. This falsehood is preventing attention being placed on the real causes which can only be dealt with by public health agencies with encouraging better nutrition and lifestyle habits. It cannot be forced with dangerous and ineffective medical interventions as is being made plain for all to see.
I agree, but there always individuals who are dependent. I would rather have Public Health if it does exist, be giving out advice and education, and even referrals to integrative health options than dangerous and ineffective quackcines and meds and the standard options of cut and burn to deal with chronic health issues.
Alternatives exist now, but the masses still rely on the mainstream. Perhaps the trust in Pubic Health will fall to a point where it will not be seen as the primary option.
My two cents - why not have both? And a special independent agency (like the representatives of the people, independent of the government bureaucracy) making sure there is a healthy competition?
We have private and public and nonprofit. Take GrassrootsHealth for example:
GrassrootsHealth’s Mission
GrassrootsHealth is a nonprofit public health research organization dedicated to moving public health messages regarding vitamin D from research into practice. It has a panel of 48 senior vitamin D researchers from around the world contributing to its operations.
I only found out about them recently, even with all the talk about Vit D in the last two years. I never saw a story in the media seeking their view on covid and how Vit D may help. There are articles on their site going back to 2020 which discuss how Vit D could help.
Ken Wilber writes about Lines of Intelligence - intellectual, emotional, etc. Humanity has to more fully develop the line of Health Intelligence.
It is about what attracts funding and why and from whom.
The following practitioners have completed at least one vitamin D CME activity (Optimal Health and/or Pregnancy), sponsored by GrassrootsHealth and the University of California San Diego (UCSD), and have given their information to be listed as a Certified D*practitioner.
No offence, but you remind me of the hard-core commies of yesteryear who maintained that the ideology was fine, only its execution was lacking due to the human factor.
This leads into a discussion of what best serves the population, private or public health care and has been going on for a long time. There are problems with both private and socialized medicine. There are other things going on that lead people to seek health care which must be addressed which involve Big Ag, Big Chem, Big Food Processing, etc.
We are in a fairly big hole. Eliminating Public Health may solve some problems, but others will arise that are tied to the economic system. Might be interesting to think about, but unless people start abandoning the free public system and/or start looking after themselves, this will remain a significant issue.
I could certainly see things being different if Big pHARMa had to actually have products that work in order to stay in business if that's one aspect you are referring to.
The whole system is headed for destruction, and Big Health is well down the road. Individual survival mode will have little time for contemplating the finer details of complexity; that discussion should have taken place, in a meaningful way, a long time ago. Since it did not, we have now reached the crash-and-burn stage.
She said so many important things that so many people have the thoughts in their head, but are too afraid to say out loud.
One vehicle for life ... too important to not care about it. I don't know of anyone that enjoys chronic or acute pain. Her candid, ad hoc, heartfelt thoughts are exactly what people to need to hear and know.
That bar graph doesn’t match the numbers. The data in the table matches the website, but the bar graph shows 15% unvaxxed hospitalization but it’s 53.2% unvaxxed hospitalization & death (it’s odd that the percentage for both is identical). Percentage found in table 2. The bar graphs on their page don’t match the bar graphs on Canada’s website. Someone really messed up. The unvaxxed percentages are higher on both deaths & hospitalization- but it’s 52.3 vs 42.6 with 4% “unprotected”. That’s not success. But the bar graph from Expose doesn’t match any data from the government page.
Yep, the table is cumulative for all of the plandemic, the bar graphs are incremental between the last two cumulative reports and generated by EXPOSE. I have added this info to the post.
Yeah, they are rough around the corners and tend to over-sensationalize the reported stats. Büt, where there is smoke, there is fire. And they are very good at smoke LOL!
It doesn't look to me like the title, chart, and table are consistent with each other. Additionally without a normalization by size of each group there is no way to interpret the information.
Cannot do unbuggered. Must cheat somewhere. The easiest is to undercount the unvaccinated by using outdated population projections. With this simple trick, the guesstimated number of unjabbed may be reduced 3x or 4x in the oldest age cohorts. Then the rates look awful for them as the denominator is undercounted 3-4 times, hence the reported rates are 3-4 times too high, all with straight face, whereas in reality they might be doing way better than the jabbed.
Between census year of 2011 and 2016, British Columbia’s population has increased 247,998 people or 5.64%.
Year Population Growth Rate
2011 4,400,057 n/a
2012 4,449,656 1.13%
2013 4,498,626 1.10%
2014 4,546,849 1.07%
2015 4,596,479 1.09%
2016 4,648,055 1.12%
2017 4,696,035 1.03%
2018 4,745,272 1.05%
2019 4,795,392 1.08%
2020 4,845,264 1.04%
2021 4,894,302 1.01%
So, they took that number from Q2 2018. Sure, pre-pandemic times. Does that mean they released the virus at the 2nd half of 2018? Likely.
The real pop number should be then close to 4,920,000. Extra 145,000 of unvaccinated, 896,000 instead of 751,000, or 19.3% more. Now, I'd have to go into the demographic data to figure out what they report for older age cohorts now and what it should really be, but you get the picture?
This makes my blood boil. I am thankful for your posts and those of other fact reporters. It's criminal that the media refuses to be truthful about this horrible toxic crap. With the desired result of too many people blindly complying to hurt if not kill themselves and their children. Really who does this benefit?
So now we enter the stage where finally the lackluster “elites” know we know and are going to have to - in one way or another - face the music?
Rhetoric...
There may be three phases to "knowing". First, the regulators knew the trial data which could not have incuded those categories of people who were expressly excluded (pregnant women, elderly, frail, immuno-compromised, babies, and such). Yet they rushed to administer the shots to the elderly and soon down the line to the very young and, now, the youngest. The trial data did not have the power to ascertain risks to people of childbearing age as per the small sample who became pregnant during the trials; and as per the brevity of the trials before unblinding.
Second phase might be the period during which the regulators, and healtch care providers, knew of adverse injuries, incuding deaths, that came from the early months of the shot programs around the world; hugely significant safety signals appeared but were disregarded.
Third phase begins around about mid-summer 2022. There is just so much evidence of ineffectiveness and lack of safety that all norms are challenged by the continuation and the expansion of the shot programs.
Now each of these phases would have details that were available to those with greater access to the data and had the obligation to provide analysis of that data. There is that duty to know also, among the public servants, incuding elected politicians, who sponsors the promotion of these shots both with taxpayer funding and with loud and urgent and persistent propaganda.
Sometimes there are people who became skeptical, bit by bit, until they reached a startling conclusion about some aspect of the efficacy and/or safety of the C19 shots. For example, some doctors jumped on the bandwagon because ... pro-vax bias ... and also got the shots themselves. Then, during the second phase became vocally concerned and advocated greater caution if not outright rejection regarding the shots. By now, those doctors would be digging into the greater body of evidence and bringing more and more pubic attention to the first two phases. But doctors are not the only nor even the best example. Consider those parents who got the shots and then, perhaps during phase two, realized that their teenaged kids, or college aged children, were being coerced openly by authorities; while the parents might have thought it safer to get shots themselves, they were also subjected to coercion in many places regarding their livelihoods. So they had a bad taste of covidmania by that point; the third and fourth shots probally moved them to the skeptical side of the aisle. Seeing people sick -- even getting C19 symptoms or test results -- convinced many that this was a farce. And now, parents who have seen the coercion regarding K-12 in schools but also in sports and other activities, will have become more aware of the unfairness being promoted in the name of public health. The third phase is front and center as babies are being brought into the shot campaigns.
I DO THINK that the third phase, and going forward, will open very many authorities to criminal investigations because the duty of care, the duty to know better, to obligation to protect actually has begun to run against covidmania notions of protection. Reasonable precaution is a fact-based assertion and that can not withstand scrutiny at this moment and going forward.
The first and second phases may present greater challenges to bring forth criminal investigations of ordinary people who jumped on the band wagon of these C19 shots. But for those phases we can count on lots of strong evidence to bring investigations and charges against regulators and decisions-makers in government, incuding elected poiticians.
The chart and the reports in this substack, now, this summer, have set the stage for phase three. Each and every conscientious reader needs to do his or her part in gathering evidence locally and close to home. Those in authority need to be put on notice and brought under scrutiny. Their duties and obligations mean that if they are negligent they will be found guilty; and if they continued knowingly, out of some odd sense of loyalty to a political agenda or out of fear of being found out, then, their crimes will be subject to much harsher scrutiny and penalty.
It seems like the Covid propaganda dam is starting to collapse, at least in the US:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1542800039961051137
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1542995723754606593/pu/vid/848x464/Z1KoEUu82L7PS-29.mp4?tag=12
The more they know the more they can not deny having cause to query the Shot program. LOCAL authorities. Document their written policies and their conduct. Inform them of what is now in plain sight. Let them know you know. Usually they will defend their actions, promote their actions, and stand by those actions -- if recent history is any basis for short term future. They will readily restate coz they think its right. Those who become doubtful will say so and act accordingingly. Then gather the evidence as events unfold in your home turf. This is how change will happen, if it does, and how it can become more than superficial tinkering -- like ending/ banning restrictions instead of temporarily suspending. Let's encourage all substack authors to promote this and to show how it can be done. Commenters can bring their examples and this creates a forum in which documentation is modelled and archived. For example: start a weekly or monthly open thread for this purpose.
What do you think?
I owe my audience a follow-up post on "Mass Formation-> Mass Psychosis-> Mass Delusion -> Mass Atrocities". This idea fits nicely in there. In a day or two.
It's not easy to mobilize the audience, but. "If Not Us, Who? If Not Now, When?"
This is the rapture time. "You also must be ready, for the Son of Man is coming at an hour you do not expect" ( Luke 12:40 ).
The DailyExpose is on my daily reading list.
Falsehood, meet reality. Quackcination does not improve health outcomes. What we have is a pandemic of belief in preventing chronic illness through quackcination that is failing miserably. This falsehood is preventing attention being placed on the real causes which can only be dealt with by public health agencies with encouraging better nutrition and lifestyle habits. It cannot be forced with dangerous and ineffective medical interventions as is being made plain for all to see.
I agree, but there always individuals who are dependent. I would rather have Public Health if it does exist, be giving out advice and education, and even referrals to integrative health options than dangerous and ineffective quackcines and meds and the standard options of cut and burn to deal with chronic health issues.
Alternatives exist now, but the masses still rely on the mainstream. Perhaps the trust in Pubic Health will fall to a point where it will not be seen as the primary option.
My two cents - why not have both? And a special independent agency (like the representatives of the people, independent of the government bureaucracy) making sure there is a healthy competition?
We have private and public and nonprofit. Take GrassrootsHealth for example:
GrassrootsHealth’s Mission
GrassrootsHealth is a nonprofit public health research organization dedicated to moving public health messages regarding vitamin D from research into practice. It has a panel of 48 senior vitamin D researchers from around the world contributing to its operations.
https://www.grassrootshealth.net/?post_projects=about-us
I only found out about them recently, even with all the talk about Vit D in the last two years. I never saw a story in the media seeking their view on covid and how Vit D may help. There are articles on their site going back to 2020 which discuss how Vit D could help.
Ken Wilber writes about Lines of Intelligence - intellectual, emotional, etc. Humanity has to more fully develop the line of Health Intelligence.
It is about what attracts funding and why and from whom.
Is it a research organization or a health service provider? More like research. I was referring to health services for an average Joe and Jane.
They conduct research and sell tests. They have a directory of doctors that are described as follows:
GrassrootsHealth Certified Vitamin D*practitioners
The following practitioners have completed at least one vitamin D CME activity (Optimal Health and/or Pregnancy), sponsored by GrassrootsHealth and the University of California San Diego (UCSD), and have given their information to be listed as a Certified D*practitioner.
https://www.grassrootshealth.net/project/daction-practitioners/
No offence, but you remind me of the hard-core commies of yesteryear who maintained that the ideology was fine, only its execution was lacking due to the human factor.
This leads into a discussion of what best serves the population, private or public health care and has been going on for a long time. There are problems with both private and socialized medicine. There are other things going on that lead people to seek health care which must be addressed which involve Big Ag, Big Chem, Big Food Processing, etc.
We are in a fairly big hole. Eliminating Public Health may solve some problems, but others will arise that are tied to the economic system. Might be interesting to think about, but unless people start abandoning the free public system and/or start looking after themselves, this will remain a significant issue.
I could certainly see things being different if Big pHARMa had to actually have products that work in order to stay in business if that's one aspect you are referring to.
The whole system is headed for destruction, and Big Health is well down the road. Individual survival mode will have little time for contemplating the finer details of complexity; that discussion should have taken place, in a meaningful way, a long time ago. Since it did not, we have now reached the crash-and-burn stage.
Or they crash-and-burn us 1st.
How many times do we have to say, "Bueller? Bueller?"
It's a COOKBOOK!!!!!!!!
Thinking of my family in Canada and praying for them. This is the single most important video I have watched in my lifetime. I hope it will be shared. - https://leemuller.substack.com/p/single-most-important-video-to-watch
Vaccine Carnage in the ER - a nurse speaks out.
"I was injected with toxic poison!" Spitting it out gets right to the heart of the matter.
She said so many important things that so many people have the thoughts in their head, but are too afraid to say out loud.
One vehicle for life ... too important to not care about it. I don't know of anyone that enjoys chronic or acute pain. Her candid, ad hoc, heartfelt thoughts are exactly what people to need to hear and know.
Trudeau can EAT MY SHIT and after that I’d love to kick him in the nuts. He is the most despised POS in Canadastan
drjohnsblog.substack.com
Medical Vitamin-D expert, David Grimes MD has been sorting through Canadian government health statistics, which are cumulative.
He substacted the totals from the week of 4/10/22 from the week of 4/17/22 and found this information about COVID deaths for that week.
Covid-19 deaths among the unvaccinated increased from 9511 to 9512, an increase during the week of just one.
Only 1 of the 227 Covid-19 deaths was a person who had not been vaccinated. Let this true but unpublicised fact sink in.
http://www.drdavidgrimes.com/
whats the matter with this man ... how many times has he gotten covid ??
was he really vaxxed ?? boosted ??? still getting it ??
dont know what to say ...
And while suppressing and denying treatment .
That bar graph doesn’t match the numbers. The data in the table matches the website, but the bar graph shows 15% unvaxxed hospitalization but it’s 53.2% unvaxxed hospitalization & death (it’s odd that the percentage for both is identical). Percentage found in table 2. The bar graphs on their page don’t match the bar graphs on Canada’s website. Someone really messed up. The unvaxxed percentages are higher on both deaths & hospitalization- but it’s 52.3 vs 42.6 with 4% “unprotected”. That’s not success. But the bar graph from Expose doesn’t match any data from the government page.
Yep, the table is cumulative for all of the plandemic, the bar graphs are incremental between the last two cumulative reports and generated by EXPOSE. I have added this info to the post.
Medical Vitamin-D expert, David Grimes MD has been sorting through Canadian government health statistics, which are cumulative.
He substacted the totals from the week of 4/10/22 from the week of 4/17/22 and found this information about COVID deaths for that week.
Covid-19 deaths among the unvaccinated increased from 9511 to 9512, an increase during the week of just one.
Only 1 of the 227 Covid-19 deaths was a person who had not been vaccinated. Let this true but unpublicised fact sink in.
http://www.drdavidgrimes.com/
Thanks, reworked the numbers for the latest period from EXPOSE. In the post now, comparing apples to apples.
I'm glad to have been able to contribute, Andeas!
drjohnsblog.substack.com
Yeah, they are rough around the corners and tend to over-sensationalize the reported stats. Büt, where there is smoke, there is fire. And they are very good at smoke LOL!
It doesn't look to me like the title, chart, and table are consistent with each other. Additionally without a normalization by size of each group there is no way to interpret the information.
Fair point - added stats on jabs in Canada. You do the math in your head. And read the caveats.
Looks like total hospitalization and death #s under chart are for a different timeframe rather than just the one month?
Yes, the Table5 data is cumulative from the biblical times till June 5. Added the remarks to that effect taken from the EXPOSE article.
Cannot do unbuggered. Must cheat somewhere. The easiest is to undercount the unvaccinated by using outdated population projections. With this simple trick, the guesstimated number of unjabbed may be reduced 3x or 4x in the oldest age cohorts. Then the rates look awful for them as the denominator is undercounted 3-4 times, hence the reported rates are 3-4 times too high, all with straight face, whereas in reality they might be doing way better than the jabbed.
Bingo! They use the total population number at https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/bccdc/viz/BCCDCCOVID-19SurveillanceDashboard/Introduction to be 4,774,500. We are in Q2 2022. Büt (https://www.canadapopulation.net/british-columbia-population/):
Between census year of 2011 and 2016, British Columbia’s population has increased 247,998 people or 5.64%.
Year Population Growth Rate
2011 4,400,057 n/a
2012 4,449,656 1.13%
2013 4,498,626 1.10%
2014 4,546,849 1.07%
2015 4,596,479 1.09%
2016 4,648,055 1.12%
2017 4,696,035 1.03%
2018 4,745,272 1.05%
2019 4,795,392 1.08%
2020 4,845,264 1.04%
2021 4,894,302 1.01%
So, they took that number from Q2 2018. Sure, pre-pandemic times. Does that mean they released the virus at the 2nd half of 2018? Likely.
The real pop number should be then close to 4,920,000. Extra 145,000 of unvaccinated, 896,000 instead of 751,000, or 19.3% more. Now, I'd have to go into the demographic data to figure out what they report for older age cohorts now and what it should really be, but you get the picture?
Deathcare, right!
I'll ask a guy from BC.