Two years ago, I would have dismissed you as conspiracy nutter! And yet, here we are in 2022, and I can't find fault in what you say, only pray that it isn't true.
Yes, well done! People's experiences so far that may point to this happening are: body becoming magnetic, Bluetooth signal, and there was a video I saw recently of a woman having a seizure after a flash of light emitted from her phone. We will see what other experiences arise that points to this.
I've already seen elsewhere a string of patents leading to this. Most claim to be about restoring movement to the paralyzed. The last, however, from Microsoft is a dead giveaway: a communication & monitoring system that sends instructions to a device, monitors movements, reports when the movements appropriate to the instruction have taken place, & then deposits cryptocurrency into an account.
That said, billions of malfunctioning & nonfunctioning toys are not real useful to anyone. I sometimes envision the vaxx death toll reaching a point of bulldozing into mass graves.
That one is the MS payment one. There is a string of patents from various other entities, that result in a "device" (transceiver?) implanted on the brain.
I am a song writer with over 30 years experience writing songs
I once worked as a temp for Bogle and Gates which makes me highly qualified to speak about Bill, having operated a copy machine for his lawyer father.
Those folks had their office on like the 55th floor, and one day the elevators were broken so I walked down.
My comment is, we have 54 flights left to get back down to earth.
We are going the wrong way, to Mars, we ain't getting there no matter how many hacksxxxine rocket dreams we shoot. Outer space still a pipe dream for Womanity
A needless dream. We got a few things to fix on the ground
I hope we can get back down there
I thought your piece was sort of mold middle of the road well rounded and frankly, not really news to me, but written well enough I could get thru
I did not see anything astounding at this point, nor even vaguely controversial
I thought about cancelling the subscription but decided not to, merely to spite your electrical engineer trollster
I felt his comment not worthy of response, but then I guess I just did...
LOL! I just like to sift through things and organize them in posts, for the record. Otherwise things get lost in a huge pile of intellectual junk aka a hard drive. And sometimes it adds up to interesting stuff I deem worthy of attention of others. Including engineers with their metal rings and contrary opinions. Arguing should be promoted, not suppressed.
Grasshopper Kaplan, my intent is not to be a troll. My goal is to help people from unnecessary fear. There is plenty to be afraid of. Let's focus on the real threats. I was too harsh in saying to not follow Andreas. But either way, don't unsubscribe or stay for me. Do what seems right to you.
I know I went out on a limb with my hypothesis. But it explains well why on earth they would want to jab the whole world many times over with such unyielding ruthlessness. And Trudeau in Canada booked 8 jabs for every Canadian back at the start of 2020. He knew the jabs will not work as a "vaccine", not that he's the sharpest knife in the drawer, the WEF told him so. They must have their strong reasons. And mRNA inside LNP might not be the only reason. The fact that graphene nanoparticles are in the jabs needs to be explained somehow. The jigsaw puzzle pieces must fit together. As long as we have the complete set of pieces to work with. The facts on the ground.
Yes - they (world government leaders) seem determined to get multiple jabs into every arm. Unyielding ruthlessness as you say! Too many knowledgeable people in the medical industry have broken too many *fundamental* rules about pandemics and vaccines to be written off as an accident, coincidence or incompetence. There seems to be an agenda. Some have proposed its a depopulation agenda. Of course, that sounds crazy to a rational person - but we must not blackmail ourselves with thought constraints (such as "conspiracy theorist") when we see possible explanations. The spike protein of the virus is what does the damage. Over 40 mechanisms of injury documented so far. The virus appears to have been engineered. Why was the spike protein selected as the antigen for the "vaccine?" What was the fraudulent Corman-Drosten PCR test used, which allowed the authorities to label all deaths as COVID? Something is foul - very foul. And the authorities seem to be achieving their goals with 60-70% of the population. Who needs nanobots when you have every major media outlet, every social media platform, world government and all major corporations acting in unison towards this evil end?
Jeez - 85-95% - I was afraid of that. It is not easy to guess the end - but it's clear they want to use this situation to take away Liberties and gain greater control and compliance. If we read the words of Klaus Schwab at the World Economic Forum - and let in how many in positions of power now pay allegiance to his agenda - we can assume the GREAT ECONOMIC RESET is underway. Collapse all world governments and fiat currencies and reboot under a globalist government and central bank digital currencies. I'm not saying I know - but it sure fits... I'd like someone to come along and convince me that the idea is as crazy as nanobots!
electrical engineer trollster? I doubt it very much....there are some truths in what he says especially towards the end of his comment.....so what’s the real purpose for the rapid rollout of 5G? We’re missing a piece of the puzzle. Many countries have already paid a lot for the proposed instalment of the much safer fibre optic connections so why the need for any 5G?
Carmel, I'd like to put your mind at ease regarding 5G. Today 5G exists in very similar frequency bands as 4G. There is very little difference today between 5G and 4G. So if you don't fear 4G then don't fear 5G. Or if you fear 5G then fear 4G. The same can be said of 3G and 2G. 5G has the possibility to use much higher frequency bands, but these bands suffer from the characteristic that they do not penetrate walls, windows or even skin. 25GHz can only penetrate skin by about 0.5mm. So when these higher frequency bands are utilized, they won't even be able to get inside your body. (You should like that.) 5G in the lower frequency bands used today differ from 4G slightly in the way data is packed into the signal. 5G uses a higher modulation scheme. Basically it amounts to the hardware and software being able to detect much finer differences in voltage - like microvolts of difference. It is hard to imagine how a human body would be able to detect the difference between a 5G and 4G signal. Also, 5G is designed to have more antennas closer to the users. So instead of a cell tower with high power signals coming out of it (and into you) - we can have a much lower power antenna on the street light in front of our house. The result is less RF power into your body. 4G and 5G are small signals, but still 5G can be smaller. Hopefully this eases your mind a bit.
Thanks for explaining all that.....do you happen to know why 5G cell towers have a higher energy demand than the 4G, 3G, 2G cell towers? Also do you happen to know if there higher EMF’s emitted from 5G cell towers than 4G cell towers? Also why the great push for 5G over fibre optics broadband?
Can you explain what you mean by "higher energy demand?" A 5G tower (may not actually be a "tower" - may be an antenna on a street light) should take less power because it serves a smaller cell. But perhaps, once fully deployed there will be many more antennas such that the 5G net power could be greater when everything is added up.
A 5G tower should emit much lower power than a 4G tower because it serves a much smaller cell. The higher the transmit power the farther the signal reaches. What we want in 5G is many small cells next to each other. You don't really want the transmissions from one cell being heard by another cell otherwise it causes interference. So the power is tuned down compared to 4G.
Fiber will serve the 5G towers and then getting that signal to people (users) will be wireless. 5G competes against service providers who deliver fiber to the home. So Verizon's 5G may now compete with Comcast for providing video and data to your home. Eventually, 5G doesn't just have to be for mobile applications. We will see how this plays out. Everyone is trying to steal everyone else's lunch!
I was involved in the 1G push in the cable/fiber world for decades. I still think it is a solution in search of a problem for most people. At my house I can't tell the difference between 100Mbps and 300Mbps unless I'm downloading a large file. It's an arms race and a marketing war to win your business more than a technology need, IMO.
The backup battery storage packs for 5G cell towers has switched from lead acid batteries to lithium ion battery storage packs because more backup storage is required. Lithium Ion battery energy storage is let’s say more hazardous......it is also the weak point!
I'm really not sure. It may have more to do with energy density than total energy supplied by the batteries. With 5G cell sites being located on traffic lights or street lights, there isn't a lot of space for larger lead-acid batteries. 5G requires more processing power than 4G and that translates to more electrical power, but transmit power is lower. The power to run all of the equipment is not the same as the transmit power. Or better said, the transmit power is only a part of the total power required.
(Yes, battery waste is an environmental issue that will raise its head if Battery Electric Vehicles gain much marketshare. I certainly hope they do not because they are another false promise, but I digress.)
So everything is fine and dandy. Except that not a single safety study for human health or the environment was ever done. Thus, obviously, it is hard to imagine what is likely to happen with 5G, although there are some wild guesses and none of them is pretty.
Same zero to lax safety regulation goes for the sanctioning of the deployment of toxic high fire/explosive risk lithium ion battery energy storage systems all over the planet.....and the crazy push for electric battery powered vehicles (e-scooters, cars, vans, buses, trains, boats, aircraft.....)
I’ve been seriously objecting to this toxic junk since about 2016.......this is probably far worse than the covid con and yet people in general have yet to wake up to the dangers.
Re the zerohedge article about the Biden admin requesting delay of 5G:
"Update (1320ET): In a shocking turn of events in this age of 'obey or be canceled' culture, AT&T and Verizon have rebuffed a request from federal transportation officials to delay the launch of new 5G wireless services."
I'm still interested in seeing for myself the MAC addresses of the vaccinated using Bluetooth. I'm wondering if the people who have got it to work are already in a 5G activated area. This video shows him going through the Bluetooth settings on his phone and selecting 'without names' and then maybe? 'rarely used devices'. https://www.bitchute.com/video/EkkWsSyyNLqM/
This what we all must do next: experiment with the jabbed ppl to see if they emit MAC addresses to your cell phone. If this is confirmed, then we are on the right track. Find a few volunteers among some reasonable jabbed that took it under duress. Don’t approach covidians though, as they may be very hostile.
I don't think that's possible. A bluetooth transceiver is a pretty sophisticated device, not something that can be made nanoscale, let alone powered within the body. What you're seeing reported are pings by people's contact-tracing systems on their phones. These are typically on by default, you can usually disable them if you hunt around in the settings. Anyway, if you're doing this experiment, make sure their phones are turned off. Better yet, turn them off and then put them in a metal box. (It's surprisingly hard to turn a phone completely off these days!)
There are certainly such things as nanoscale tracking dots that work passively, reflecting back a unique RF signature in response to a pulsed emmitter. Same principle of operation as commonplace NFC tags, just miniaturized. I haven't seen any evidence that these are included in the current round of injections, but I haven't really gone looking either. Anyway, not to be confused with Bluetooth.
Sure, BMI is a thing. Has been for decades. And yes, DARPA is funding nonsurgical BMI proposals, along with other far-fetched topics. But even the ambitious, technically risky, super advanced research that's being proposed by contractors in response to this program sounds like bulky MRI helmets, doesn't it? Not so much like injectable bluetooth transmitters.
Of course DARPA wants this stuff. And of course Batelle wants their money, and will tell them what they want to hear, and back it up as best they can until the money runs out. That's how this game is played.
Anyway, if you want experimental confirmation, please go ahead! Just remember to look for signals in bodies, not phones. The phones definitely emit contact tracing signals, and you can read all about that.
I worked for the largest manufacture of NFC components for about a decade. NFC is cool, but if passive, not much information is transferred and the tag must be excited by a rather strong field emitted by a transmitter gate. Its a great idea if you are pushing a shopping cart through the checkout line - but to track people not very practical unless we covered the planet in RFID gates. There is no need for this with everyone's smartphone knowing their exact location every minute of the day. That infrastructure is already in place. If vax passports are implemented via the phones then we will have to travel with them everywhere whether we want to or not.
Yes - almost impossible to turn off a smartphone - even when you think its off its not. Need to put it in a Faraday Cage.
So, I am picturing a fella with a gun...who is injected...but is trying to fight the mind control powers that he knows is infiltrating...but part of him sees through it, and he just wants to take out the people who did this....somehow....but they are telling him that they are not the enemy, that I am....that all 'purebloods' are....
OK, thats my nightmare scenario, not so nightmare and not so scenario....I wonder what can block the signal.....somehow...if and when...or already...
That scenario is a remote one, IMHO. More immediately, it might be a form of an injected identification that cannot be removed, and a visit every so often to the "Adjustment Bureau" so they can take a scan of your brain while delivering a set of psychological tests to you, for which you will get you blockchain payment. Or not. Or to be able to fry your brain with an electromagnetic gun more easily.
I had thought about just the burning up possibility, but I just don't see many dumb enough to let things get that far....I just wonder what they can do with 2 jabs and or a booster....it will take force after that, 90% will be non compliant....even just the dead footballers will be enough, never mind their babes...
Check out this: https://jnlwp.defense.gov/About/Frequently-Asked-Questions/Active-Denial-System-FAQs/ "The Active Denial System is an advanced, long-range non-lethal, directed energy, counter-personnel capability that projects a man-sized (1.5 m) beam of millimeter waves (not microwaves) at a range up to 1,000 meters. It will have the same compelling non-lethal effect on all human targets, regardless of size, age and gender. " 5G is also in the millimeter-waves range, btw. So, the jabbed might be much more susceptible to ADS crowd control, and maybe to the point of death.
I'm skeptical about wildly (uncontrolled) forming, moving and orienting structures "somewhere in the body" being able to use energy of the nervous system. That sounds like wishful SciFi thinking while ignoring pesky details of reality. Like how they would actually tap that "energy", that, btw, is present only in as much as it's _actually needed_ where needed. There is nothing extra to tap, like "The Matrix" would make you believe.
Who isn't? Count me there too. That's why I am working on another post that examines the state of the art today. I admit that my previous post got ahead of itself in terms of the deficit of evidence. I will correct that in short order. In the meantime, it is better to be safe than sorry by avoiding the undisclosed stuff being injected into you by nefarious forces on an escalating schedule. Or are you fine with that?
I read Steve Kirsch's substack, I was aware of Bhakdi and other German "heretics" in early 2020, and there are enough problems with those products that don't sound like SciFi, so - no, not fine with that ;)
The problem I see with too speculative stuff is that it could be used to tarnish sober criticism of products with it, too, especially in times when the sober stuff already sounds crazy e.g. w.r.t. level and breadth of institutional corruption.
Really? We are all anti-vaxxers anyways, there nothing you can do to clear your name. On the other hand, if injectable nanodevices turn out to be the thing, this may be even bigger than mRNA/LNPs in jabs. No wonder they have planned for an extinction event back in 2010: "The funding that started Moderna was the National Science Foundation grant called ‘Darwinian Chemical Systems’. https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=0434507https://psuvanguard.com/chemistry-grant-takes-aim-at-lifes-origins/".
Don't turn a blind eye onto something you don't feel like it to entertain. I feel strongly about it.
I'm working on making it less speculative and more matter-of-fact as we speak. I also don't like it as it is very scary. I wished it wasn't real. I'll keep everyone posted.
As an electrical engineer with over 30 years experience in the semiconductor industry, my advice to all readers is to not follow this author, who doesn't understand what he is talking about. His articles are monuments to scientific & technological fallacy, fantasy, conflation and half-truths. I won't spend my time trying to provide specific issues with the claims as nearly every paragraph would require many pages of writing to unwind. There are plenty of things to fear, but they are far more mundane. You should have no concerns about things being injected into a human that can control them. This is not possible now and I doubt it will be possible in 200 years. Besides, if they can forcefully inject you, they already control you. Your smart phone, with the information you voluntarily provide to Big Tech, and facial recognition with ubiquitous cameras are all that is needed to track you. To control you all they need is fear and executive power to mandate things like vaccine passports. People are far too willing to comply and therefore no science fantasy technology is required.
Regardless, checking out jabbed for MAC addresses should be simple enough and should settle this argument, do you agree? If not there, I will be first to rejoice and declare defeat.
Andreas, human bodies are not communicating with Bluetooth or Ethernet devices. The claim is utterly absurd. You might as well tell people you are a pink pixie and that you fly. It would be no less absurd. I have experience designing such communications systems. How do you think injecting something into a person will allow their body to do all of the processing required for those protocols and transmit signals with precise packets with the right voltages and timing?
What you are doing is deceiving and harming people by filling them with unnecessary fear. If you want to help people you should keep to topics you understand.
Ok, doc, how about Battelle, for one? Enlighten us. And there is much more that I haven’t touched upon, in terms of transhumans for military applications. Your 30 years on transistors are kinda obsolete in 21st century. Also, go through 86 references at the end of the previous post. That all is trash too?
Andreas, what is your background in science and technology? Do you have one? Have you any experience in the real world designing electronic communication systems, control systems or integrated circuits? Do you understand semiconductor physics? Have you brought high tech products to market? You seem like a well intentioned person, but you are scaring people with things that are not possible. Perhaps you are scared yourself and this is understandable, but what you are doing is not helping anyone.
Regarding Battelle, you cite a PRESS RELEASE as your source of information. No one in the industry who understands what they are talking about would use a press release as an authoritative source. Press releases are designed to gain interest in a company to pump stock prices - or in this case ensure continued funding of research. Just because you can throw millions of $$ at bioengineers to play in a lab doesn't mean you will get anything that actually works in the real-world as a result. Only non-technical people who have no experience bringing high tech products to market are impressed with DARPA funding something. DARPA is designed to burn through tax payers money with no regards to any actual benefits or working products. At best, what Battelle will achieve is some minor signal exchanges with an anesthetized animal under laboratory conditions. That is light years from what you fear. It is not something that you need to fear because the laws of physics are on your side.
"Transhumanism" is a science fantasy. The people who can't cure the common cold are not going to be able to successfully inject something into a human and turn them into a zombie slave. There are far easier ways to do that! Here are a few things to consider to ease your mind about transhumanism. Humans are unbelievably complex. The human brain has over 85 billion neurons. Anything that controls this machine must likewise be complex. Complexity takes a lot of processing power. Processing power requires a lot of transistors. [No, transistors are not 'kinda obsolete in the 21st century.] A lot of transistors takes a lot of electrical power, with a specific regulated voltage and current. Where will this electrical power come from inside the body? The power of electromagnetic energy is a function of the inverse of the distance squared. Where is the power coming from to communicate to the outside world at a distance? The frequency of a communication signal determines the length of the antenna. Nano sized antennas are tuned to frequencies that cannot penetrate skin. The list goes on and on. Put your mind at ease. Transhumanism is not something to fear. If you want something to fear, then fear bioweapon spike proteins that are used as antigens in "vaccines," which are forced on us. Fear manufactured pandemic panic to take away all of our liberties, ushering in totalitarian control.
My background is physics and IT, and I know how semiconductors work. And destroying something is much easier than building. That's why an atomic bomb was built before a nuclear power plant. With all due respect, have faith in science. You are seriously behind the curve on these topics. Read up some more.
Well use your background in physics and contemplate: What is the relationship between transmit power and transmit distance? What is the relationship between transmit frequency and antenna length? What antenna length is possible inside a body if injected? What is the penetration capacity of the frequencies that could be transmitted with that antenna size? Could that signal propagate outside the body? How much electrical power is required to run these devices? Where is that power coming from? How will that power be regulated to the voltages and currents required by the devices? How will these devices interface with the human body? How will the devices withstand the corrosive/oxidative stresses of the body and immune system attacks on them? These are all fundamental aspects of physics that can not be overcome by slapping a "Funded by DARPA" label on it.
A good exercise for calibrating the intuition: take a broad cross-section of recent DARPA proposals, and read them critically, as an engineer. Unfortunately, the results of funded projects are rarely publicly available. In my experience, it's usually because they are generally underwhelming. Occasionally something special emerges, and in those cases the contractors love to brag. Classified projects we can assume never see the light of day, but should we really expect that they are more successful?
Thanks. The article says: "Noninvasive neurotechnologies such as the electroencephalograph and transcranial direct current stimulation already exist, but offer nowhere near the precision, resolution, and portability required for advanced application by people in real world settings."
They then go on to say they will get there someday. This is what companies always say when they want to keep their funding. It doesn't mean they will be successful. I have seen these kinds of claims and promises for 30-40 years. It goes with the territory - and experience tells you to apply extreme skepticism.
Furthermore, everything they are working was achievable 40 years ago with a joy stick and a human hand. Fighter pilots now have helmets that can follow their eyes to aid in interfacing to the machine.
When it comes down to it, there is little need for this impossibility DARPA is dreaming of. You know, not every idea is a good idea. Just because DARPA wants it doesn't mean it is good or it will become so.
Again, ease your mind. Crazy people may be dreaming of injecting you and turning you into your slave - but don't waste time now being concerned about them. Be concerned about the pharma companies with untested therapies that your government forces on you because they profit from it. Be concerned about social media companies that censor your speech and try to get you to follow government dictates.
People should be scared of these vaccines for more reasons than one. There is now an established track record of WHO-sponsored vaccination programmes putting undeclared harmful substances into the vaccines. And as they want so badly to jab anyone many-many times, in a most illogical fashion, this should heighten everyone's distrust to the max. I hope this post helps with that. I have added "P.S." to my post, check it out.
With all due respect. Wasn't mRNA in jabs light years away in 2018? And here we are. Not that it works as advertised, but it is being injected into you anyways. Same with nano devices.
"Wasn't mRNA in jabs light years away in 2018?" A: No, it wasn't that it was far away - it was that it failed to deliver as promised. It wasn't that getting mRNA into a cell could not work. It was not possible to get mRNA into a cell *safely* (without LNPs and adjuvants that were dangerous). This is not the same as with nano technology - which you define as a complex system that can take over a human body.
So, how about the 86 references? This field has been worked on feverishly for the last 15 years. I saw a video where an expert was telling the defense department declined mind control techniques in 2015 as too outlandish. Then in 2016 admitted that it is now in the realm of possibility and MUST be actively worked on. In one year - 180 degrees.
If your 86 references are like the others you provided, I'll pass. Without a career long background of bringing complex systems to market, you can be easily fooled into conflating a lab experiment or goal with a possible reality. There isn't a snowball's chance in hell that what you fear will be possible in you lifetime. There is no need for it. There is already a bioweapon spike protein being injected into the majority of the human race. The mechanisms of action of that protein are documented and not science fantasy.
Stop being so disrespectful! Much of what is being proposed is seriously flawed.....it will fail.....whereas the basics in electrical engineering are tried and tested.
It might fail, I am not saying it'll work like a charm. But they are testing it on a global scale, on you and me. I don't like to pretend it is not happening.
It is happening but it will fail catastrophically. Unfortunately there will be some collateral damage.....just like the clinical trial animals who were killed in lab experiments. The quicker we all stop bickering and put together the missing pieces of the puzzle the quicker one limits the potential extent of the collateral damage.
In today's world we all have to be able to discern as best we can for ourselves what is truth and reality, and what is fallacy, fantasy, conflation, and half truths. The days of trusting our betters are far gone. That world no longer exists.
There is so much happening now at lightening speed, disclosures that shock me daily, but that doesn't mean I stick my head in the sand or obey when I am told to "not follow" someone. I immediately question the agenda of the person telling me that. It seems to be that you haven't done your due diligence at digging for the truth of what is now reality.
And this is from 2015! But DARPA chose non-surgical approach via injectables. Also, I do not make stuff up, I quote from the sources and provide references for all to be able to verify.
Rust. Agreed. Trust no one. I didn't ask anyone to trust me. But if you don't have a technical background it is difficult to sift through the claims and counterclaims. I'm trying to point you towards fundamental physics. This is where the possibilities can be ruled in or ruled out. We already have things going on (forced vaccines) that warrant concern/fear. My suggestion is to keep your eye on the real threats - not the imaginary ones. Everything Andreas presented in his article is not a real threat. That is my warning. Do with it what you will.
Thank you. It's easy to grow impatient with this kind of confusion.
I've worked on DARPA projects myself, and it's important to remember that the claims being made, especially in proposals, are typically very much overstated. This agency only funds "ambitious" projects. So what you're reading from Batelle is sort of a sci-fi wish-fulfillment sales job aimed at some pretty crazy people inside the defense-industrial complex. The gap between "theoretically possible" and "technologically practical" is big. It's certainly shifting all the time, but I can't say I've seen much evidence that it's closing.
Thank you Shy Boy! It is great to hear from someone with experience at DARPA. In the consumer world there are similar gaps between what is real and what is promised to Wall Street. I have been on many earnings calls between CEO/CFOs and Wall Street Analysts. All I can say is that the analysts rarely ask the right questions and the C-Level Execs on the calls always dance around SEC laws and state half truths. The goal is getting the stock price up. And in 90 days a different dance takes place to keep the game going. It is interesting to hear you say not much evidence that the gap is closing. I think it comes back to crazy ideas running into the laws of physics and the LOP wins every time.
I'm still skeptical. It's hard for me to believe that injectable technology has advanced to the level that microscopically small particles of graphene could be fully functional bluetooth transceivers.
But even if it isn't true (yet): in a mandatory, high-frequency injection regime, there's no way to know what is going to be in your body after your next injection.
There's no reason to think that everyone gets the same injection, either. Experimentation could be targeted towards particular races, classes, locations or professions.
And if it's verifiably true that some people become bluetooth nodes after injection, how can I argue with that? Perhaps I could speculate that some vials might contain silicon microchips in addition to graphene nanoparticles. Technology is almost beside the point, if this is happening IRL.
The earlier claims that some injected folks became magnetic, were also hard to believe. But the reports were eventually verified by Del Bigtree's Highwire and by Chris Martenson, both highly credible IMHO. Occam's razor, as you say: why would they lie, and how could they be fooled? It must be true, and it's very important if it is. But I haven't noticed any followup from them.
We’ll need to follow through on that as well. The adverse effects of the jabs and the mandates cloud the picture so much that we may miss the elephant in the room.
Here's a silicon Bluetooth module, for comparison. The system includes a microcontroller, transceiver, antenna, and everything else you need for a complete Bluetooth application, in a package 3.5mm by 3.5mm by 1mm thick. Claims to be the world's smallest as of 2015. Process technology has advanced by about a factor of 3 (linear dimension) since then.
Thank you so much! Why isn't anyone sounding alarm bells over it? This is nuts, inexplicable, nothing in the vaxx should be causing it, yet it does. Proves that there are undeclared components in the jabs. Yet, those qualified to investigate this tend to die suddenly, when then try (Andreas Noack).
Martenson admonishes his subscribers: "mum's the word" about anything in the members only discussion. But I never signed any nondisclosure, so -- 'scuse me, but this is important.
Chris's last word on the subject, from June 8 (as best I can find with the search tool on the site, which is problematic):
"Yes, magnetic injection sites seems to be ‘a thing.’ No, I don’t have any good working hypotheses yet for why this is the case, nor if it is of any health consequence at all. I’m only reasonably sure that it’s not due to anything directly that is injected from the vaccine vial into the arm. The amounts involved just couldn’t get the job done."
A forum member came up with the theory that immune system hyperactivation was causing reactive oxygen species (ROS) to interact with ferritin circulating in the blood, creating superparamagnetism. Chris never agreed with that, but never disputed it either. In retrospect it seems a little lame, in that ferritin blood levels are typically 300 micrograms per liter or less. Also: there have been some reports of anemia caused by the jabs, but it doesn't seem to be nearly as common as the magnetic-arm effect.
Several of us opined that graphene in the jabs could be a plausible explanation, but the more dominant view was that the graphene theory was/is a psy-op, and we should stay focussed on known harms from the spike protein.
Just read Malone post citing insurance actuaries in Indianapolis. I couldn't comment there but I can say here the thing he said that I'd been saying, the hope of being wrong and afraid of being right, I paraphrase.
I think if this turns out to be vaguely as bad as it is looking like, we are not gonna have too many folks to argue with.
No worries Will, if u see this
We need to get along.
I ended up unsubscribing from a different substack, saying how gloomy everything is, and now I think it is so much worse....woops
I knew the mass viruganda was seriously bad news but I think what is coming is something no one is prepared for, and will be unfathomable like the current disCog.
Hope we can stop it, the tidal wave...as the tide slowly turns...
This being an era of coincidinks, I have just checked JimStone.is. If you scroll down to CONFIRMED: Area 51 playstation game from 2005, there is a short video clip that I am going to watch a couple times more.
Many suppose 5G towers are part of this. What do you think of the recent announcement the Biden administration is asking two carriers I.e. Verizon to delay activating their towers due to concerns about towers near airports creating interference with air traffic control?
I don't think ZH commenters are much of a reputable source for anything.
But, put yourself in the shoes of those perpetuating this mass cull. Would they want people dying quickly all at once, or slowly over a longer period? Even without any foreign material in the body, 5G presents an increased risk for EMF-induced cancers.
If they're patient, quietly sterilizing the masses (without any other side-effects) would be the 'best" way to do a mass-cull. Or perhaps, they simply want to kill as many people as quickly as possible.
It should be clear that they're playing a long game, having prepared the field for this operation for years if not decades. I suppose it's possible that they'd want a swift and decisive final move, but it had better be really final, because it would be super obvious. Also it would cause a huge amount of social chaos, which I think they'd be scared of. They don't just want any old armageddon, they want one that they can remain in control of. I think they much prefer frog-boiling.
There are two schools of masonic thought about this - for the fast one, see my reference to Attali in another comment. Decades in preparation it is, not years.
A doctor friend of mine talks to a British freemason; they both have similar hobbies. A year ago and unprompted, he told me he would get jabbed because he would like to travel. We had a brief discussion, with me probing a little, and it transpired my friend was aware of the sterilization ploy. The knowledge in his case could only have come from his mason chum, and the issue did not bother him since he was sterile already. He did not know about the other grave risks involved with the magic potion, so obviously he had not been warned by his source. From it I assumed that while the intention was not to kill but only to effect "Depopulation through vaccination" (TM: Gates), there had been a serious device malfunction, on a par with that of the Challenger space shuttle. But the agenda must continue acc. to plan, which brings us into the current mess. Yes, speculation, but if it fits ...
In the news today: "The acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic could end by July 2022 if every country ends up vaccinating at least 70 per cent of its population, the World Health Organization says."
So, they target 70% for destruction, at this round.
Here's an article and very long video about freemasonry that I just found. Apparently, most of the elites are freemasons and it's a satanic cult?! (I did not watch the full video yet.)
Two years ago, I would have dismissed you as conspiracy nutter! And yet, here we are in 2022, and I can't find fault in what you say, only pray that it isn't true.
3 months ago I would do it to myself too.
Just reporting the facts on the ground. All with references. Occam's razor.
Yes, well done! People's experiences so far that may point to this happening are: body becoming magnetic, Bluetooth signal, and there was a video I saw recently of a woman having a seizure after a flash of light emitted from her phone. We will see what other experiences arise that points to this.
Check out the pps i have just appended to the post
Whether this is the sinister intent of the COVID vaccine is still open to debate but no-one can deny it's on the wishlist! https://www.theepochtimes.com/china-pursues-brain-control-weaponry-in-bid-to-command-future-of-warfare_4186003.html
Whatever happened to Charles Lieber, the Harvard nanoman? Last time I looked, not much.
Check out the P.P.S. that I have just appended to the post. I seems I have been onto something, skepticism notwithstanding.
It is true
Keep up the resistance
And pray
Can "our" people please STOP using their terms and words like "conspiracy ..."?
Chill Barry, it's well intended! Happy New Year 2022! Or, as they will call it soon, the year 0 of the next era.
Conspiracy is fine; it is conspiracy theory that is objectionable.
I've already seen elsewhere a string of patents leading to this. Most claim to be about restoring movement to the paralyzed. The last, however, from Microsoft is a dead giveaway: a communication & monitoring system that sends instructions to a device, monitors movements, reports when the movements appropriate to the instruction have taken place, & then deposits cryptocurrency into an account.
That said, billions of malfunctioning & nonfunctioning toys are not real useful to anyone. I sometimes envision the vaxx death toll reaching a point of bulldozing into mass graves.
The patent WO2020060606, in the best Satanist tradition. This is who we face.
That one is the MS payment one. There is a string of patents from various other entities, that result in a "device" (transceiver?) implanted on the brain.
Have you read my previous post?
Yes.
I am a song writer with over 30 years experience writing songs
I once worked as a temp for Bogle and Gates which makes me highly qualified to speak about Bill, having operated a copy machine for his lawyer father.
Those folks had their office on like the 55th floor, and one day the elevators were broken so I walked down.
My comment is, we have 54 flights left to get back down to earth.
We are going the wrong way, to Mars, we ain't getting there no matter how many hacksxxxine rocket dreams we shoot. Outer space still a pipe dream for Womanity
A needless dream. We got a few things to fix on the ground
I hope we can get back down there
I thought your piece was sort of mold middle of the road well rounded and frankly, not really news to me, but written well enough I could get thru
I did not see anything astounding at this point, nor even vaguely controversial
I thought about cancelling the subscription but decided not to, merely to spite your electrical engineer trollster
I felt his comment not worthy of response, but then I guess I just did...
Mild I meant , no mold woops
LOL! I just like to sift through things and organize them in posts, for the record. Otherwise things get lost in a huge pile of intellectual junk aka a hard drive. And sometimes it adds up to interesting stuff I deem worthy of attention of others. Including engineers with their metal rings and contrary opinions. Arguing should be promoted, not suppressed.
Grasshopper Kaplan, my intent is not to be a troll. My goal is to help people from unnecessary fear. There is plenty to be afraid of. Let's focus on the real threats. I was too harsh in saying to not follow Andreas. But either way, don't unsubscribe or stay for me. Do what seems right to you.
I know I went out on a limb with my hypothesis. But it explains well why on earth they would want to jab the whole world many times over with such unyielding ruthlessness. And Trudeau in Canada booked 8 jabs for every Canadian back at the start of 2020. He knew the jabs will not work as a "vaccine", not that he's the sharpest knife in the drawer, the WEF told him so. They must have their strong reasons. And mRNA inside LNP might not be the only reason. The fact that graphene nanoparticles are in the jabs needs to be explained somehow. The jigsaw puzzle pieces must fit together. As long as we have the complete set of pieces to work with. The facts on the ground.
Yes - they (world government leaders) seem determined to get multiple jabs into every arm. Unyielding ruthlessness as you say! Too many knowledgeable people in the medical industry have broken too many *fundamental* rules about pandemics and vaccines to be written off as an accident, coincidence or incompetence. There seems to be an agenda. Some have proposed its a depopulation agenda. Of course, that sounds crazy to a rational person - but we must not blackmail ourselves with thought constraints (such as "conspiracy theorist") when we see possible explanations. The spike protein of the virus is what does the damage. Over 40 mechanisms of injury documented so far. The virus appears to have been engineered. Why was the spike protein selected as the antigen for the "vaccine?" What was the fraudulent Corman-Drosten PCR test used, which allowed the authorities to label all deaths as COVID? Something is foul - very foul. And the authorities seem to be achieving their goals with 60-70% of the population. Who needs nanobots when you have every major media outlet, every social media platform, world government and all major corporations acting in unison towards this evil end?
85-90% in Canada. So what is the evil end? It seems to me that they are piggybacking one evil end on top of the other.
Jeez - 85-95% - I was afraid of that. It is not easy to guess the end - but it's clear they want to use this situation to take away Liberties and gain greater control and compliance. If we read the words of Klaus Schwab at the World Economic Forum - and let in how many in positions of power now pay allegiance to his agenda - we can assume the GREAT ECONOMIC RESET is underway. Collapse all world governments and fiat currencies and reboot under a globalist government and central bank digital currencies. I'm not saying I know - but it sure fits... I'd like someone to come along and convince me that the idea is as crazy as nanobots!
You can hear my music in utoob
Been writing songs for 40 years
It would be great to know an electrical engineer
Regards
electrical engineer trollster? I doubt it very much....there are some truths in what he says especially towards the end of his comment.....so what’s the real purpose for the rapid rollout of 5G? We’re missing a piece of the puzzle. Many countries have already paid a lot for the proposed instalment of the much safer fibre optic connections so why the need for any 5G?
Carmel, I'd like to put your mind at ease regarding 5G. Today 5G exists in very similar frequency bands as 4G. There is very little difference today between 5G and 4G. So if you don't fear 4G then don't fear 5G. Or if you fear 5G then fear 4G. The same can be said of 3G and 2G. 5G has the possibility to use much higher frequency bands, but these bands suffer from the characteristic that they do not penetrate walls, windows or even skin. 25GHz can only penetrate skin by about 0.5mm. So when these higher frequency bands are utilized, they won't even be able to get inside your body. (You should like that.) 5G in the lower frequency bands used today differ from 4G slightly in the way data is packed into the signal. 5G uses a higher modulation scheme. Basically it amounts to the hardware and software being able to detect much finer differences in voltage - like microvolts of difference. It is hard to imagine how a human body would be able to detect the difference between a 5G and 4G signal. Also, 5G is designed to have more antennas closer to the users. So instead of a cell tower with high power signals coming out of it (and into you) - we can have a much lower power antenna on the street light in front of our house. The result is less RF power into your body. 4G and 5G are small signals, but still 5G can be smaller. Hopefully this eases your mind a bit.
Thanks for explaining all that.....do you happen to know why 5G cell towers have a higher energy demand than the 4G, 3G, 2G cell towers? Also do you happen to know if there higher EMF’s emitted from 5G cell towers than 4G cell towers? Also why the great push for 5G over fibre optics broadband?
While large swaths of California have no G at all.
Can you explain what you mean by "higher energy demand?" A 5G tower (may not actually be a "tower" - may be an antenna on a street light) should take less power because it serves a smaller cell. But perhaps, once fully deployed there will be many more antennas such that the 5G net power could be greater when everything is added up.
A 5G tower should emit much lower power than a 4G tower because it serves a much smaller cell. The higher the transmit power the farther the signal reaches. What we want in 5G is many small cells next to each other. You don't really want the transmissions from one cell being heard by another cell otherwise it causes interference. So the power is tuned down compared to 4G.
Fiber will serve the 5G towers and then getting that signal to people (users) will be wireless. 5G competes against service providers who deliver fiber to the home. So Verizon's 5G may now compete with Comcast for providing video and data to your home. Eventually, 5G doesn't just have to be for mobile applications. We will see how this plays out. Everyone is trying to steal everyone else's lunch!
I was involved in the 1G push in the cable/fiber world for decades. I still think it is a solution in search of a problem for most people. At my house I can't tell the difference between 100Mbps and 300Mbps unless I'm downloading a large file. It's an arms race and a marketing war to win your business more than a technology need, IMO.
The backup battery storage packs for 5G cell towers has switched from lead acid batteries to lithium ion battery storage packs because more backup storage is required. Lithium Ion battery energy storage is let’s say more hazardous......it is also the weak point!
I'm really not sure. It may have more to do with energy density than total energy supplied by the batteries. With 5G cell sites being located on traffic lights or street lights, there isn't a lot of space for larger lead-acid batteries. 5G requires more processing power than 4G and that translates to more electrical power, but transmit power is lower. The power to run all of the equipment is not the same as the transmit power. Or better said, the transmit power is only a part of the total power required.
(Yes, battery waste is an environmental issue that will raise its head if Battery Electric Vehicles gain much marketshare. I certainly hope they do not because they are another false promise, but I digress.)
So everything is fine and dandy. Except that not a single safety study for human health or the environment was ever done. Thus, obviously, it is hard to imagine what is likely to happen with 5G, although there are some wild guesses and none of them is pretty.
Same zero to lax safety regulation goes for the sanctioning of the deployment of toxic high fire/explosive risk lithium ion battery energy storage systems all over the planet.....and the crazy push for electric battery powered vehicles (e-scooters, cars, vans, buses, trains, boats, aircraft.....)
I’ve been seriously objecting to this toxic junk since about 2016.......this is probably far worse than the covid con and yet people in general have yet to wake up to the dangers.
Re the zerohedge article about the Biden admin requesting delay of 5G:
"Update (1320ET): In a shocking turn of events in this age of 'obey or be canceled' culture, AT&T and Verizon have rebuffed a request from federal transportation officials to delay the launch of new 5G wireless services."
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/faa-transportation-secretary-buttigieg-request-two-week-delay-5g-services-citing-potential
The carriers told Brandon to take a hike today
I'm still interested in seeing for myself the MAC addresses of the vaccinated using Bluetooth. I'm wondering if the people who have got it to work are already in a 5G activated area. This video shows him going through the Bluetooth settings on his phone and selecting 'without names' and then maybe? 'rarely used devices'. https://www.bitchute.com/video/EkkWsSyyNLqM/
This what we all must do next: experiment with the jabbed ppl to see if they emit MAC addresses to your cell phone. If this is confirmed, then we are on the right track. Find a few volunteers among some reasonable jabbed that took it under duress. Don’t approach covidians though, as they may be very hostile.
It might be better to use an EMF meter to check on the injected bodies. Some claim their field is much stronger than usual.
I don't think that's possible. A bluetooth transceiver is a pretty sophisticated device, not something that can be made nanoscale, let alone powered within the body. What you're seeing reported are pings by people's contact-tracing systems on their phones. These are typically on by default, you can usually disable them if you hunt around in the settings. Anyway, if you're doing this experiment, make sure their phones are turned off. Better yet, turn them off and then put them in a metal box. (It's surprisingly hard to turn a phone completely off these days!)
There are certainly such things as nanoscale tracking dots that work passively, reflecting back a unique RF signature in response to a pulsed emmitter. Same principle of operation as commonplace NFC tags, just miniaturized. I haven't seen any evidence that these are included in the current round of injections, but I haven't really gone looking either. Anyway, not to be confused with Bluetooth.
https://idstch.com/technology/biosciences/darpa-n3-developing-nonsurgical-brain-machine-interfaces-for-soldiers-to-use-his-thoughts-alone-to-control-multiple-unmanned-vehicles-or-a-bomb-disposal-robot-on-battlefield/
Sure, BMI is a thing. Has been for decades. And yes, DARPA is funding nonsurgical BMI proposals, along with other far-fetched topics. But even the ambitious, technically risky, super advanced research that's being proposed by contractors in response to this program sounds like bulky MRI helmets, doesn't it? Not so much like injectable bluetooth transmitters.
Of course DARPA wants this stuff. And of course Batelle wants their money, and will tell them what they want to hear, and back it up as best they can until the money runs out. That's how this game is played.
Anyway, if you want experimental confirmation, please go ahead! Just remember to look for signals in bodies, not phones. The phones definitely emit contact tracing signals, and you can read all about that.
I worked for the largest manufacture of NFC components for about a decade. NFC is cool, but if passive, not much information is transferred and the tag must be excited by a rather strong field emitted by a transmitter gate. Its a great idea if you are pushing a shopping cart through the checkout line - but to track people not very practical unless we covered the planet in RFID gates. There is no need for this with everyone's smartphone knowing their exact location every minute of the day. That infrastructure is already in place. If vax passports are implemented via the phones then we will have to travel with them everywhere whether we want to or not.
Yes - almost impossible to turn off a smartphone - even when you think its off its not. Need to put it in a Faraday Cage.
A car would seem to be a Faraday cage, yet it is not enough to block the signal. I wonder what sort of cage is really effective.
Check this out then: https://emfempowerment.com/top-emf-shielding-fabrics-2020/
Yeadon says if vaxxports go thru our goose is cooked
Digital injection currency system is slavery at best...
Thanks
Yup the madmen own those they altered the DNA of by patent law
Have to change it all
Blessings
So, I am picturing a fella with a gun...who is injected...but is trying to fight the mind control powers that he knows is infiltrating...but part of him sees through it, and he just wants to take out the people who did this....somehow....but they are telling him that they are not the enemy, that I am....that all 'purebloods' are....
OK, thats my nightmare scenario, not so nightmare and not so scenario....I wonder what can block the signal.....somehow...if and when...or already...
That scenario is a remote one, IMHO. More immediately, it might be a form of an injected identification that cannot be removed, and a visit every so often to the "Adjustment Bureau" so they can take a scan of your brain while delivering a set of psychological tests to you, for which you will get you blockchain payment. Or not. Or to be able to fry your brain with an electromagnetic gun more easily.
I had thought about just the burning up possibility, but I just don't see many dumb enough to let things get that far....I just wonder what they can do with 2 jabs and or a booster....it will take force after that, 90% will be non compliant....even just the dead footballers will be enough, never mind their babes...
Check out this: https://jnlwp.defense.gov/About/Frequently-Asked-Questions/Active-Denial-System-FAQs/ "The Active Denial System is an advanced, long-range non-lethal, directed energy, counter-personnel capability that projects a man-sized (1.5 m) beam of millimeter waves (not microwaves) at a range up to 1,000 meters. It will have the same compelling non-lethal effect on all human targets, regardless of size, age and gender. " 5G is also in the millimeter-waves range, btw. So, the jabbed might be much more susceptible to ADS crowd control, and maybe to the point of death.
Many science fiction books in the libraries have just been moved to non-fiction.
Remote scenario, you say. Well, it did not seem remote in mid-nineties: https://www.bitchute.com/video/LPCH5r7PMARa/
Is it for real from the 90s???
Yes, 1994 or ´95; one of the few masonic public faux-pas.
Picture a white waterlilly
A yellow tulip
A red rose
The blue ocean
A starry sky
I'm skeptical about wildly (uncontrolled) forming, moving and orienting structures "somewhere in the body" being able to use energy of the nervous system. That sounds like wishful SciFi thinking while ignoring pesky details of reality. Like how they would actually tap that "energy", that, btw, is present only in as much as it's _actually needed_ where needed. There is nothing extra to tap, like "The Matrix" would make you believe.
Who isn't? Count me there too. That's why I am working on another post that examines the state of the art today. I admit that my previous post got ahead of itself in terms of the deficit of evidence. I will correct that in short order. In the meantime, it is better to be safe than sorry by avoiding the undisclosed stuff being injected into you by nefarious forces on an escalating schedule. Or are you fine with that?
I read Steve Kirsch's substack, I was aware of Bhakdi and other German "heretics" in early 2020, and there are enough problems with those products that don't sound like SciFi, so - no, not fine with that ;)
The problem I see with too speculative stuff is that it could be used to tarnish sober criticism of products with it, too, especially in times when the sober stuff already sounds crazy e.g. w.r.t. level and breadth of institutional corruption.
Really? We are all anti-vaxxers anyways, there nothing you can do to clear your name. On the other hand, if injectable nanodevices turn out to be the thing, this may be even bigger than mRNA/LNPs in jabs. No wonder they have planned for an extinction event back in 2010: "The funding that started Moderna was the National Science Foundation grant called ‘Darwinian Chemical Systems’. https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=0434507 https://psuvanguard.com/chemistry-grant-takes-aim-at-lifes-origins/".
Don't turn a blind eye onto something you don't feel like it to entertain. I feel strongly about it.
I'm working on making it less speculative and more matter-of-fact as we speak. I also don't like it as it is very scary. I wished it wasn't real. I'll keep everyone posted.
As an electrical engineer with over 30 years experience in the semiconductor industry, my advice to all readers is to not follow this author, who doesn't understand what he is talking about. His articles are monuments to scientific & technological fallacy, fantasy, conflation and half-truths. I won't spend my time trying to provide specific issues with the claims as nearly every paragraph would require many pages of writing to unwind. There are plenty of things to fear, but they are far more mundane. You should have no concerns about things being injected into a human that can control them. This is not possible now and I doubt it will be possible in 200 years. Besides, if they can forcefully inject you, they already control you. Your smart phone, with the information you voluntarily provide to Big Tech, and facial recognition with ubiquitous cameras are all that is needed to track you. To control you all they need is fear and executive power to mandate things like vaccine passports. People are far too willing to comply and therefore no science fantasy technology is required.
Regardless, checking out jabbed for MAC addresses should be simple enough and should settle this argument, do you agree? If not there, I will be first to rejoice and declare defeat.
Andreas, human bodies are not communicating with Bluetooth or Ethernet devices. The claim is utterly absurd. You might as well tell people you are a pink pixie and that you fly. It would be no less absurd. I have experience designing such communications systems. How do you think injecting something into a person will allow their body to do all of the processing required for those protocols and transmit signals with precise packets with the right voltages and timing?
What you are doing is deceiving and harming people by filling them with unnecessary fear. If you want to help people you should keep to topics you understand.
Do not worry, William. We do not fear - we just entertain the ideas! Resilience is the name of the game.
Ok, doc, how about Battelle, for one? Enlighten us. And there is much more that I haven’t touched upon, in terms of transhumans for military applications. Your 30 years on transistors are kinda obsolete in 21st century. Also, go through 86 references at the end of the previous post. That all is trash too?
Andreas, what is your background in science and technology? Do you have one? Have you any experience in the real world designing electronic communication systems, control systems or integrated circuits? Do you understand semiconductor physics? Have you brought high tech products to market? You seem like a well intentioned person, but you are scaring people with things that are not possible. Perhaps you are scared yourself and this is understandable, but what you are doing is not helping anyone.
Regarding Battelle, you cite a PRESS RELEASE as your source of information. No one in the industry who understands what they are talking about would use a press release as an authoritative source. Press releases are designed to gain interest in a company to pump stock prices - or in this case ensure continued funding of research. Just because you can throw millions of $$ at bioengineers to play in a lab doesn't mean you will get anything that actually works in the real-world as a result. Only non-technical people who have no experience bringing high tech products to market are impressed with DARPA funding something. DARPA is designed to burn through tax payers money with no regards to any actual benefits or working products. At best, what Battelle will achieve is some minor signal exchanges with an anesthetized animal under laboratory conditions. That is light years from what you fear. It is not something that you need to fear because the laws of physics are on your side.
"Transhumanism" is a science fantasy. The people who can't cure the common cold are not going to be able to successfully inject something into a human and turn them into a zombie slave. There are far easier ways to do that! Here are a few things to consider to ease your mind about transhumanism. Humans are unbelievably complex. The human brain has over 85 billion neurons. Anything that controls this machine must likewise be complex. Complexity takes a lot of processing power. Processing power requires a lot of transistors. [No, transistors are not 'kinda obsolete in the 21st century.] A lot of transistors takes a lot of electrical power, with a specific regulated voltage and current. Where will this electrical power come from inside the body? The power of electromagnetic energy is a function of the inverse of the distance squared. Where is the power coming from to communicate to the outside world at a distance? The frequency of a communication signal determines the length of the antenna. Nano sized antennas are tuned to frequencies that cannot penetrate skin. The list goes on and on. Put your mind at ease. Transhumanism is not something to fear. If you want something to fear, then fear bioweapon spike proteins that are used as antigens in "vaccines," which are forced on us. Fear manufactured pandemic panic to take away all of our liberties, ushering in totalitarian control.
My background is physics and IT, and I know how semiconductors work. And destroying something is much easier than building. That's why an atomic bomb was built before a nuclear power plant. With all due respect, have faith in science. You are seriously behind the curve on these topics. Read up some more.
Well use your background in physics and contemplate: What is the relationship between transmit power and transmit distance? What is the relationship between transmit frequency and antenna length? What antenna length is possible inside a body if injected? What is the penetration capacity of the frequencies that could be transmitted with that antenna size? Could that signal propagate outside the body? How much electrical power is required to run these devices? Where is that power coming from? How will that power be regulated to the voltages and currents required by the devices? How will these devices interface with the human body? How will the devices withstand the corrosive/oxidative stresses of the body and immune system attacks on them? These are all fundamental aspects of physics that can not be overcome by slapping a "Funded by DARPA" label on it.
Read this attentively: https://idstch.com/technology/biosciences/darpa-n3-developing-nonsurgical-brain-machine-interfaces-for-soldiers-to-use-his-thoughts-alone-to-control-multiple-unmanned-vehicles-or-a-bomb-disposal-robot-on-battlefield/
But as with an atomic bomb, they might be injecting nano devices to destroy, not to work miracles. Much simpler usually.
A good exercise for calibrating the intuition: take a broad cross-section of recent DARPA proposals, and read them critically, as an engineer. Unfortunately, the results of funded projects are rarely publicly available. In my experience, it's usually because they are generally underwhelming. Occasionally something special emerges, and in those cases the contractors love to brag. Classified projects we can assume never see the light of day, but should we really expect that they are more successful?
Thanks. The article says: "Noninvasive neurotechnologies such as the electroencephalograph and transcranial direct current stimulation already exist, but offer nowhere near the precision, resolution, and portability required for advanced application by people in real world settings."
They then go on to say they will get there someday. This is what companies always say when they want to keep their funding. It doesn't mean they will be successful. I have seen these kinds of claims and promises for 30-40 years. It goes with the territory - and experience tells you to apply extreme skepticism.
Furthermore, everything they are working was achievable 40 years ago with a joy stick and a human hand. Fighter pilots now have helmets that can follow their eyes to aid in interfacing to the machine.
When it comes down to it, there is little need for this impossibility DARPA is dreaming of. You know, not every idea is a good idea. Just because DARPA wants it doesn't mean it is good or it will become so.
Again, ease your mind. Crazy people may be dreaming of injecting you and turning you into your slave - but don't waste time now being concerned about them. Be concerned about the pharma companies with untested therapies that your government forces on you because they profit from it. Be concerned about social media companies that censor your speech and try to get you to follow government dictates.
People should be scared of these vaccines for more reasons than one. There is now an established track record of WHO-sponsored vaccination programmes putting undeclared harmful substances into the vaccines. And as they want so badly to jab anyone many-many times, in a most illogical fashion, this should heighten everyone's distrust to the max. I hope this post helps with that. I have added "P.S." to my post, check it out.
With all due respect. Wasn't mRNA in jabs light years away in 2018? And here we are. Not that it works as advertised, but it is being injected into you anyways. Same with nano devices.
"Wasn't mRNA in jabs light years away in 2018?" A: No, it wasn't that it was far away - it was that it failed to deliver as promised. It wasn't that getting mRNA into a cell could not work. It was not possible to get mRNA into a cell *safely* (without LNPs and adjuvants that were dangerous). This is not the same as with nano technology - which you define as a complex system that can take over a human body.
So, how about the 86 references? This field has been worked on feverishly for the last 15 years. I saw a video where an expert was telling the defense department declined mind control techniques in 2015 as too outlandish. Then in 2016 admitted that it is now in the realm of possibility and MUST be actively worked on. In one year - 180 degrees.
If your 86 references are like the others you provided, I'll pass. Without a career long background of bringing complex systems to market, you can be easily fooled into conflating a lab experiment or goal with a possible reality. There isn't a snowball's chance in hell that what you fear will be possible in you lifetime. There is no need for it. There is already a bioweapon spike protein being injected into the majority of the human race. The mechanisms of action of that protein are documented and not science fantasy.
Lots of wisdom from professional with plenty of practical experience.......please have patience with the young scientists! They’ll get there.
Stop being so disrespectful! Much of what is being proposed is seriously flawed.....it will fail.....whereas the basics in electrical engineering are tried and tested.
It might fail, I am not saying it'll work like a charm. But they are testing it on a global scale, on you and me. I don't like to pretend it is not happening.
It is happening but it will fail catastrophically. Unfortunately there will be some collateral damage.....just like the clinical trial animals who were killed in lab experiments. The quicker we all stop bickering and put together the missing pieces of the puzzle the quicker one limits the potential extent of the collateral damage.
And that is my point. Thank you!
Please stay signed up.......the truth is somewhere in the middle......
And keep poking away, but substantiated.
In today's world we all have to be able to discern as best we can for ourselves what is truth and reality, and what is fallacy, fantasy, conflation, and half truths. The days of trusting our betters are far gone. That world no longer exists.
There is so much happening now at lightening speed, disclosures that shock me daily, but that doesn't mean I stick my head in the sand or obey when I am told to "not follow" someone. I immediately question the agenda of the person telling me that. It seems to be that you haven't done your due diligence at digging for the truth of what is now reality.
Here's an interesting article from The Smithsonian that challenges your assertion. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/flexible-circuit-has-been-injected-living-brains-180955525/
And this is from 2015! But DARPA chose non-surgical approach via injectables. Also, I do not make stuff up, I quote from the sources and provide references for all to be able to verify.
Rust. Agreed. Trust no one. I didn't ask anyone to trust me. But if you don't have a technical background it is difficult to sift through the claims and counterclaims. I'm trying to point you towards fundamental physics. This is where the possibilities can be ruled in or ruled out. We already have things going on (forced vaccines) that warrant concern/fear. My suggestion is to keep your eye on the real threats - not the imaginary ones. Everything Andreas presented in his article is not a real threat. That is my warning. Do with it what you will.
Thank you. It's easy to grow impatient with this kind of confusion.
I've worked on DARPA projects myself, and it's important to remember that the claims being made, especially in proposals, are typically very much overstated. This agency only funds "ambitious" projects. So what you're reading from Batelle is sort of a sci-fi wish-fulfillment sales job aimed at some pretty crazy people inside the defense-industrial complex. The gap between "theoretically possible" and "technologically practical" is big. It's certainly shifting all the time, but I can't say I've seen much evidence that it's closing.
Thank you Shy Boy! It is great to hear from someone with experience at DARPA. In the consumer world there are similar gaps between what is real and what is promised to Wall Street. I have been on many earnings calls between CEO/CFOs and Wall Street Analysts. All I can say is that the analysts rarely ask the right questions and the C-Level Execs on the calls always dance around SEC laws and state half truths. The goal is getting the stock price up. And in 90 days a different dance takes place to keep the game going. It is interesting to hear you say not much evidence that the gap is closing. I think it comes back to crazy ideas running into the laws of physics and the LOP wins every time.
I'm still skeptical. It's hard for me to believe that injectable technology has advanced to the level that microscopically small particles of graphene could be fully functional bluetooth transceivers.
But even if it isn't true (yet): in a mandatory, high-frequency injection regime, there's no way to know what is going to be in your body after your next injection.
There's no reason to think that everyone gets the same injection, either. Experimentation could be targeted towards particular races, classes, locations or professions.
No matter what you think, do not give up your bodily autonomy to satanists. We can agree on that, can’t we?
Yes, absolutely agreed.
And if it's verifiably true that some people become bluetooth nodes after injection, how can I argue with that? Perhaps I could speculate that some vials might contain silicon microchips in addition to graphene nanoparticles. Technology is almost beside the point, if this is happening IRL.
The earlier claims that some injected folks became magnetic, were also hard to believe. But the reports were eventually verified by Del Bigtree's Highwire and by Chris Martenson, both highly credible IMHO. Occam's razor, as you say: why would they lie, and how could they be fooled? It must be true, and it's very important if it is. But I haven't noticed any followup from them.
We’ll need to follow through on that as well. The adverse effects of the jabs and the mandates cloud the picture so much that we may miss the elephant in the room.
Here's a silicon Bluetooth module, for comparison. The system includes a microcontroller, transceiver, antenna, and everything else you need for a complete Bluetooth application, in a package 3.5mm by 3.5mm by 1mm thick. Claims to be the world's smallest as of 2015. Process technology has advanced by about a factor of 3 (linear dimension) since then.
https://www.tdk-electronics.tdk.com/en/374108/tech-library/articles/products-technologies/products-technologies/world-s-smallest-bluetooth-v4-1-smart-module/1359468
Found this on magnetism, Highwire, May 2021: https://truthcomestolight.com/the-covid-vaccine-magnet-challenge/ Nothing from Chris Martenson.
Here's Martenson's public comment:
https://www.peakprosperity.com/forum-topic/the-magnet-challenge/page/2/#post-624389
There was much more behind the paywall.
Thank you so much! Why isn't anyone sounding alarm bells over it? This is nuts, inexplicable, nothing in the vaxx should be causing it, yet it does. Proves that there are undeclared components in the jabs. Yet, those qualified to investigate this tend to die suddenly, when then try (Andreas Noack).
Martenson admonishes his subscribers: "mum's the word" about anything in the members only discussion. But I never signed any nondisclosure, so -- 'scuse me, but this is important.
Chris's last word on the subject, from June 8 (as best I can find with the search tool on the site, which is problematic):
"Yes, magnetic injection sites seems to be ‘a thing.’ No, I don’t have any good working hypotheses yet for why this is the case, nor if it is of any health consequence at all. I’m only reasonably sure that it’s not due to anything directly that is injected from the vaccine vial into the arm. The amounts involved just couldn’t get the job done."
A forum member came up with the theory that immune system hyperactivation was causing reactive oxygen species (ROS) to interact with ferritin circulating in the blood, creating superparamagnetism. Chris never agreed with that, but never disputed it either. In retrospect it seems a little lame, in that ferritin blood levels are typically 300 micrograms per liter or less. Also: there have been some reports of anemia caused by the jabs, but it doesn't seem to be nearly as common as the magnetic-arm effect.
Several of us opined that graphene in the jabs could be a plausible explanation, but the more dominant view was that the graphene theory was/is a psy-op, and we should stay focussed on known harms from the spike protein.
Since June, crickets.
Hi, Jerry. Can you provide links to "the reports of magnetic jabbed verified" by Del Bigtree's Highwire and by Chris Martenson?
https://thehighwire.com/videos/the-covid-vaccine-magnet-challenge/
Just read Malone post citing insurance actuaries in Indianapolis. I couldn't comment there but I can say here the thing he said that I'd been saying, the hope of being wrong and afraid of being right, I paraphrase.
I think if this turns out to be vaguely as bad as it is looking like, we are not gonna have too many folks to argue with.
No worries Will, if u see this
We need to get along.
I ended up unsubscribing from a different substack, saying how gloomy everything is, and now I think it is so much worse....woops
I knew the mass viruganda was seriously bad news but I think what is coming is something no one is prepared for, and will be unfathomable like the current disCog.
Hope we can stop it, the tidal wave...as the tide slowly turns...
Somehow I am waxing masonic today, so Jacques Attali for good measure, 1980s: https://www.thebernician.net/globalist-banker-predicted-scamdemic-genocide-of-the-useless/
Shall we go slow-slow-quick-quick, or quick-quick-quick-quick-slow?
Even for me it is too much!
This being an era of coincidinks, I have just checked JimStone.is. If you scroll down to CONFIRMED: Area 51 playstation game from 2005, there is a short video clip that I am going to watch a couple times more.
Yes. And that was 1981 or 2006...
This is the second mentioned of two way readers I've seen . The other was injectible sensor in Sweden
So why they need to read two way?
To retrieve data from our body
The news of this piece to me is the use of our own electrical field to power low charge to sensor I guess
?
They can read both whatever is already written and bodily info?
They are two way, they can write in. Instructions , data value (money), memory....?
Quote from an Australian gvt. official: "We shall have a vaccinated economy." Make of it what you will.
Funny. That is the one thing I knew and said March 11th, after I'd stopped laughing about clitorovirus...woops. Crimestop.
I said Noconomy. No economy
That's what is their fucking vaxxxine hacksxxxine viruganda economy...No economy
Also called it false flag at that time.
Now I have to say the death mother of all false flags, on behalf of Oshira
https://www.bitchute.com/video/iKidBYArmjEw/
Many suppose 5G towers are part of this. What do you think of the recent announcement the Biden administration is asking two carriers I.e. Verizon to delay activating their towers due to concerns about towers near airports creating interference with air traffic control?
It's covered in me talking with Carmel in the comments to the previous post.
Some ZH commenters think the vaxxed will start dropping like flies once the new 5G service starts.
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/faa-transportation-secretary-buttigieg-request-two-week-delay-5g-services-citing-potential
I hope not.
I don't think ZH commenters are much of a reputable source for anything.
But, put yourself in the shoes of those perpetuating this mass cull. Would they want people dying quickly all at once, or slowly over a longer period? Even without any foreign material in the body, 5G presents an increased risk for EMF-induced cancers.
If they're patient, quietly sterilizing the masses (without any other side-effects) would be the 'best" way to do a mass-cull. Or perhaps, they simply want to kill as many people as quickly as possible.
It should be clear that they're playing a long game, having prepared the field for this operation for years if not decades. I suppose it's possible that they'd want a swift and decisive final move, but it had better be really final, because it would be super obvious. Also it would cause a huge amount of social chaos, which I think they'd be scared of. They don't just want any old armageddon, they want one that they can remain in control of. I think they much prefer frog-boiling.
There are two schools of masonic thought about this - for the fast one, see my reference to Attali in another comment. Decades in preparation it is, not years.
A doctor friend of mine talks to a British freemason; they both have similar hobbies. A year ago and unprompted, he told me he would get jabbed because he would like to travel. We had a brief discussion, with me probing a little, and it transpired my friend was aware of the sterilization ploy. The knowledge in his case could only have come from his mason chum, and the issue did not bother him since he was sterile already. He did not know about the other grave risks involved with the magic potion, so obviously he had not been warned by his source. From it I assumed that while the intention was not to kill but only to effect "Depopulation through vaccination" (TM: Gates), there had been a serious device malfunction, on a par with that of the Challenger space shuttle. But the agenda must continue acc. to plan, which brings us into the current mess. Yes, speculation, but if it fits ...
In the news today: "The acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic could end by July 2022 if every country ends up vaccinating at least 70 per cent of its population, the World Health Organization says."
So, they target 70% for destruction, at this round.
Here's an article and very long video about freemasonry that I just found. Apparently, most of the elites are freemasons and it's a satanic cult?! (I did not watch the full video yet.)
https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/insider-exposes-freemasonry-as-the-worlds-oldest-secret-religion-and-the-luciferian-plans-for-the-new-world-order/
https://rumble.com/vhgzmp-insider-exposes-freemasonry-as-worlds-oldest-religion-and-luciferian-plans-.html