Law of Increasing Returns in Brazil?

Some doubt this law is applicable universally.

Some readers doubt that “Law of Increasing Returns Japan Edition” is applicable to, say, Brazil. To repeat myself, the law states that “fewer and fewer jabs in subsequent jab campaigns are causing increasingly more deaths per shot.”

Without further ado, let us dig in. Probably, the expressed doubts are based on the fact that Covid mortality, and excess mortality in general, in Brazil is trending down:

But, the critics miss the “per shot” clause of the law. As it turns out, Brazil is scaling down its jabbing efforts, whereas Japan is maintaining them at “envious” levels:

And this is reflected in the strictly-Covid mortality:

While the first two jabbing campaigns (Jun.-Sep. 2021, Jan.-Mar. 2022) in both countries were comparable, AND Brazil seems to be more vulnerable to Covid for some genetic or other reasons. The first peak of mortality in Brazil was in the absence of jabbing, so the first jabbing campaign was in the form of a kink on the downslope in June 2021 and the unnaturally elevated downslope of the first mortality spike. And while the second mortality peak was still more massive in Brazil with slightly fewer jabs administered, Japan took over Brazil in the Jun.-Jul. 2022 and Nov.-Dec. 2022 mortality spikes. To see why, it’s enough to compare the “vaccine” dozes administered that went into these two spikes.

And, as you can see from the cumulative “vaccination” graphs above, late in the jabbing game, a little bit goes a long way. I rest my case.