21 Comments
Feb 24Liked by Andreas Oehler

You're doing yeoman's work here, Andreas. There is more lipstick than pig, so to speak, with how they've been covering this up. We now live with "The Science" basically saying "do you believe me, or your lying eyes".

Expand full comment
author

Or, "roll over and die"?

Expand full comment
Feb 25Liked by Andreas Oehler

Well shazam! The same people who redefined the word "vaccine" have now redefined the word "rare."

Expand full comment
Feb 24Liked by Andreas Oehler

Another consideration in these risk vs benefit comparisons is that vaccination doesn't completely prevent infection.

Even as an unvaccinated person, I often find myself unconsciously going along with the unstated assumption that vaccines completely prevent infection. (Probably because that is what I have been told and believed my entire life.)

Expand full comment

The mRNA injections, NOT vaccines, don't do a thing to prevent infection. Start there.

Expand full comment

A good reading of immunology shows that an intramuscular vaccination, let alone an mRNA transfection, has no mechanism of preventing respiratory infection at all. None. Antibodies elicited in the bloodstream do NOT cross the mucosal barrier. The only thing that does prevent infection are NK cells, TCells and the secretory igA antibodies only found in the mucosa. These are not stimulated by vaccinations.

The claim that the shots prevented ANY respiratory infection has, therefore, no basis in immunology. Serum antibodies might help should an infection goes systemic but there has to be a massive failure of the mucosal immune response for it to get that far. Respiratory support is all that is needed up to that point. This is why the evidence of SARS-Cov2 as a unique respiratory pathogen is questionable as there are hundreds, if not thousands, of pathogens that could cause the same pathology. But if you refuse to treat people with steroids, antibiotics and other sensible respiratory support measures, because they came up as "covid-positive" then you can easily create the appearance of a single, rapidly spreading, dangerous virus that harms and kills people.

Expand full comment

Ppl still think virology is a form of science. It is not. Virologists refuse to explain why they are unable to produce any virus. If you can let that sink in. They refuse to debate their position with those such as Dr Tom Cowan and many others who simply want evidence viruses exist. It's difficult for many to believe such a large and ongoing hoax is possible. "Official" entities use the word virus to name what are actually bioweapons they created to murder masses of people. Same with so-called variants. There can be no variants for something that doesn't exist. Virology is founded on nothing but an excuse for extremely parasitic wealthy people to murder masses of people. I'm grateful you are un"vaccinated".

Expand full comment

I'm going to be a bit harsher, the Bioweapon is either performing like it is predicted, or not.

Expand full comment
author

It certainly does!

Expand full comment

Qualitative performance as expected; cf. Slide 16 (yes, that one), VRBPAC meeting, Oct. 22, 2020. Karen Kingston, rightly, refers to it continuously.

Expand full comment

Which one: The virus, the vaccine, or both?

Expand full comment
author

Same?

Expand full comment

The pharmaceutical industry is a parasite on the back of humanity.

Expand full comment

They can take that poison anything forced or mandated says they are full of SHIT AND KISS WE THE PEOPLES ASS

Expand full comment

They must think that we the masses are all stupid and looking for hopium.

Expand full comment
author

Useless eaters to be ridden of.

Expand full comment

Hello, this is Bing! I’m the new AI-powered chat mode of Microsoft Bing that can help you quickly get information about two percent people think, three percent think they think, quote 🙌.

---

“Two percent of the people think; three percent of the people think they think; and ninety-five percent of the people would rather die than think.”

This witty observation highlights the tendency of many individuals to avoid deep or critical thinking. It playfully suggests that only a small minority truly engage in thoughtful reflection, while the majority prefer to avoid it altogether. 🤔💭

It’s a clever way to remind us all to embrace intellectual curiosity and not shy away from questioning and pondering life’s complexities. 🌟

---

Still needs tweaking - why no mention of George Bernard Shaw, I wonder. ("I" am Natural Intelligence-powered.)

Expand full comment

Thank you so much for doing this kind of work. Hopefully normies are getting it and realizing what level of psychopathy is invested in them being stuck with needles and shooting up who-knows-what. It's fair enough to refer to "media" as simply "propaganda" or something more fitting. Obama's revision of the Smith/Mundt act makes it official. I'd love to see Team Humanity rename things à la Let's Go Brandon. May all those involved with this current mass murder burn in hell for eternity.

Expand full comment

Excellent work PR Team!!! Hopefully this results in more Vaxxers getting up to date on their Rat Juice shots. F789 'em.

Expand full comment