More Nails in Coffin of Official Narrative About mRNA Vaccines' Mechanism of Action

New iron-clad evidence that high titers of antibodies post "vaccinations" are caused by circulating S spikes in the "vaccinees" - a cause for concern, not celebration.

In the post “Does mRNA in Jabs Really Produce S Spike from SARS-CoV-2“ I have asserted that “the prolonged elevated level of antibodies post Covid-19 mRNA vaccination (4-7 months), is the evidence that the mRNA is active in the vaccinees’ cells for that long, producing S spike proteins and causing elevated immune reaction on the ongoing basis. When this mRNA finally wears off, it’s time for a booster!“

Moreover, “AB titer dynamics [post-”vaccination” vs post-infection] is another evidence that we are not observing a normal vaccination-conferred immunity but rather something completely different. I posit, again, that we can observe here, from the AB titer dynamics [post-”vaccination”], the actual dynamics of a die-off of the mRNA in the transfected cells of the “vaccinated”.“

The evidence presented there was compelling, but maybe not quite indisputable. As I have stumbled upon this new evidence (1. below in an excellent post by Dr. Paul Alexander, “Spike protein and components (S1 subunit) found 15 months in the blood after infection, suggestive of same for those vaccinated; can be catastrophic and was NOT studied by Pfizer or imposed by FDA“), I can now declare the case closed:

1. A study from Nov. 15, 2021, “Cutting Edge: Circulating Exosomes with COVID Spike Protein Are Induced by BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) Vaccination prior to Development of Antibodies: A Novel Mechanism for Immune Activation by mRNA Vaccines“: “…we analyzed the kinetics of induction of circulating exosomes with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and Ab following vaccination of healthy individuals. Results demonstrated induction of circulating exosomes expressing spike protein on day 14 after vaccination followed by Abs 14 d after the second dose. Exosomes with spike protein, Abs to SARS-CoV-2 spike, and T cells secreting IFN-γ and TNF-α increased following the booster dose. Transmission electron microscopy of exosomes also demonstrated spike protein Ags on their surface. Exosomes with spike protein and Abs decreased in parallel after four months.“ During the course of a viral infection, host cells release exosomes and other extracellular vesicles carrying viral and host components that can modulate the immune response. This new study confirms, without any doubt, what I have been surmising all along! The S spikes are present in the “vaccinated” for at least 4 months post 2nd jab, and as they wane, so do the touted “protective” antibodies to the S spike protein.

2. Bruce K. Patterson et al. has published this article in June 2021: “Persistence of SARS CoV-2 S1 Protein in CD16+ Monocytes in Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) Up to 15 Months Post-Infection“. It presents the evidence that S1 spike protein is detectable in the non-classical monocytes, whose half-life is mere 7 days, for up to 15 months post Covid-19 infection in some “Long Covid” patients. But, according to Dr. Robert Malone’s tweets back in July, in the course of this study they were picking randomly six healthy “controls” out of healthy “vaccinated” individuals. To their astonishment, all six had S spikes in their monocytes 6 months after their “vaccination”, with one “control” having S spikes in 15% of monocytes! Which means that S spikes linger around or get freshly produced in the vaccinated for 6+ months, contrary to the official narrative that S spikes are cleared within 2 weeks of the jab.

3. “Long-term persistence of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein: evidence and implications” (Michael Palmer, MD and Sucharit Bhakdi, MD, 2021.12.21): “The most significant finding is that spike protein is found on exosomes, that is, cell-derived vesicles, for at least four months after the second injection. This surprisingly long persistence raises the prospect of sustained inflammation within and damage to organs which express the spike protein.“

I have also updated my original post with this new evidence.

Dr. Malone indicated back in July that Dr. Patterson intended to publish an article about his accidental discovery soon. As I couldn’t find anything of the sort at pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, it would be great to hear from Dr. Patterson or Dr. Malone how the whole story ended (got swept under the carpet?)