New Evidence of Synthetic Origin of SARS-CoV-2
As if we needed even more of it. But fascinating science for those with a stomach for it.
The news of the day and the year! Follow this tweet thread from one of the authors of a brand new study strongly suggesting a lab origin of SARS-CoV-2, presenting a totally new evidence (on top of all the previous evidence that I have recapped in “HIV, SARS(-CoV-2), and All That Jazz” back on Feb. 8, 2022):
You may also want to read the study itself, “A synthetic origin of SARS-CoV-2” (BiRxiv preprint, 2022.10.20), or the Substack post of Alex Washburne from today, 2022.10.20, “A synthetic origin of SARS-CoV-2”.
Happy sleuthing, everyone!
P.S. The Defender, 2022.10.21: “New Study Blames COVID on NIH, University of North Carolina — Finds Fauci and Baric’s Fingerprints on Pandemic Bug”
Aided by some $220.5 million in National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) funding, Baric developed a so-called “Seamless Ligation” technique, which he boasted could perfectly conceal all evidence of human tampering in laboratory-created viruses. Baric nicknamed his invention the “no-see’m” method.
Now a new study, “Endonuclease fingerprint indicates a synthetic origin of SARS-CoV2,” published on the preprint server bioRxiv, shows that — apparently unbeknownst to Baric — the “seamless ligation” concealment gimmick leaves its own minute but legible signature.
Most momentously, these same researchers have discovered that damning signature in the genome of the virus that causes COVID-19.
But fascinating science for those with a nose for it.
Great work guys explaining something that many of us had already suspected.