24 Comments

at first I thought it was satire. It is not is it? these experts are this dumb? Good lord, I had little hopes but this beats it all. I follow these people from Azarbeijan who have a farm and garden, they do most of the work themselves and cook from scratch, eating all home-grown. I guess these people leave close to zero ! I advize these experts to watch the 4 years of footage from this farm ! (Kand Hajati - cannot make the upside down E)

Expand full comment

They are DEAD serious.

Expand full comment

I know they are dead serious.

It's comedy gold though. Instead of cowering and shaking in our boots we should laugh all the more loudly in their faces.

Thanks Andreas.

Expand full comment

these people need to be in an institution of another kind

Expand full comment

You have to destroy the planet in order to save it.....this in from the "brightest and best" in our noble institutes of "higher" learning.

"PROFESSING THEMSELVES WISE THEY BECAME FOOLS...."

-God, the Creator and Sustainer

Expand full comment

"at first I thought it was satire. "

It IS satire. My cousin's landlord's personal trainer knows someone at the WEF and apparently Klaus Schwab is a really nice guy with a very dry sense of humour. Everything he promotes is completely sarcastic, but he's so deadpan about it that people keep taking him seriously.... even the eating bugs thing!

Expand full comment

Master class!

Expand full comment

Stop researching. Stop gardening. Leave it to the 'experts'.

Expand full comment

Wow, who knew tomato plants would be what turned me into a member of the rebellion!

BTW, they're OK with the 44 million acres of lawn in America (much of it using heavy water resources and chemicals)? Or the use of pesticides that are killing tons of bees? Or that known carcinogens like RoundUp are still allowed to be sold in the US? Or GMO seeds? But granny's arugula is a threat to the planet??

Seriously, F every last one of these dipshit 'experts'. Plant fruit trees and garden edibles as much as possible, as well as rainwater capture. Geez, it's not enough to try and kill the avg person, but to humiliate them along the way too.

Expand full comment

Trust the science.... as many did the last few years, but are not here to tell us about how it turned out !!!.

Expand full comment

What a load of bullshit.

Expand full comment

It would be greener to put a greenhouse in the attic instead of solar panels on the roof.

Expand full comment

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LleBrTQeepc The Line Time Erased; Where Will It Be Drawn In The Future? Myron Cook geologist, very good explanation of the map you show....all Cooks vids are great. The Gulf of Mexico is very slowly filling on, over millenia, its a natural process.

Expand full comment

Millionia, actually! Like 65 million years.

Expand full comment

JACQUELINE. Another phony "study" this time from the U of M probably bought and paid for by the Climate Change Cult in conjunction with the playas that want to see the small family farms and homesteaders taken down and relocated to the nearest 15 minute city : Big Food, Big Ag and Farmer Bill and all the other exploitative and predatory entities. A pox on all their temples of doom

Expand full comment

A UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN led international "study".......who funded this unmitigated propaganda effort?

So "scientific?" NOT!!

Expand full comment

U of MI was swallowed by Big Pharma Technocrats decades ago. All the money goes to Engineering and Medical Schools, the rest languish. I watched it from the inside.

Expand full comment

Follow THE SCIENCE Daily, you peasants! How DARE you grow your own food??? What, are you crazy??? The CARBON FOOTPRINT (repeat it, over and over, ad finitum...)

Expand full comment

I guess I didn't see anything silly about the article. Maybe the idea that humans are driving global warming is silly, but I haven't read enough on that issue to have a strong opinion.

Expand full comment

How about the idea that hobby gardens kill the climate, the planet, and the humanity along with it? Not silly enough for you? Define silly, then.

Expand full comment

My impression was that the study was challenging the notion that urban farming is better than normal farming in its carbon footprint. That didn't seem too silly to me.

Expand full comment

And what kind of question is that? Who asked for the answer? And what conclusions should be drawn either way?

Reminds me of this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCLp7zodUiI

Expand full comment

LOL. I haven't seen that for a long time. :)

Expand full comment

It has been a long time!

Expand full comment