Conclusions are becoming inescapable now. We can work with fear and with that feeling of.feeling physically ill. It is a sign we are psychologically normal at accurate recognition of the presence of abuse for ourselves and our kids. It’s a place to begin. We can learn to let the anger arise and move through us as we channel it through to effect change.
I suspect if anyone is alive after this ... they'll not be overly concerned about context heheh... they'll be busy hunting for tins of food (see The Road)
Yes. It’s power. I used to think of it as control..It has been said ….propaganda’s power lies in its empirical closeness to the truth’… therein lies a problem …
Pretty sure you've commented on this before, but 100% vax rates for everyone over over 70 in a province of 14 million people? That is so very very hard to believe.
I personally have two relatives over age 75 living in Ontario who tell me they have never been vaccinated. There are also some religious denominations that have traditionally opposed all vaccination (Dutch Reformed and Christian Scientist, to be specific). So my hypothesis, if you can call it that, is that these statistics are bogus.
Their distance from reality, and who cooked them up and how, I cannot say.
Also Amish/Mennonites. The rounding error (<0.1%) is <661 persons for 80+, Are there 661+ 80+ unjabbed in Ontario? What is the importance of close to 100% jabbing rate for the gov't? Psychological warfare - the futility of resistance?
bingo. the numbers (cases, deaths, jabbed, effectiveness, amount of time between doses ~ whatever, all of them) have no basis in science or even reality. they are crafted to serve the psyop.
Look to the international order of new liberal distortions being fostered by the World Economic Forum. Their exceptional psychopathology is on display.
This is a great catch! Every ICU visit is associated with hospitalization before or after, but the reverse is not always true. Stands to reason that ICU beds hold those who can be helped, the less fortunate go to hospice or die.
I.e., the proportion of those hospitalized that can be helped, as judged by the expert opinion of ICU administrators, is trending down NOW? After all the jabbing/boosting?
No, I was thinking the complement. The proportion of hospitalized who cannot be helped is trending up. I recall something about hospitals and doctors try to keep their death numbers for unsuccessful procedures low, so they transfer such patients who "fail treatment" out of their facility and off their books by sending them to hospice, onto hospice/palliative care books. So I wonder if there's numbers for those patients who are stashed away to hide their stories from public view. It explains the donut on the data and certainly sounds in character for these soulless demons.
I don't think so, unless there's some home health involvement. They may be discharged to rehab (not addiction obviously) for very long term that just can't recover, but another care facility that can also start running up the bills for long term care or hospice for short term to ease death. You saw those horrible conditions in Pfizer's "adverse events" list. Think of people with debilitating illness or condition, who won't recover from covid because they're so compromised from the jab. What the hell would you do with such people? ICU is for patients who are progressing. Stacks of people who can't recover, and have a protracted illness can't stay hospitalized forever. If you're evil, up to your eyeballs in the coverup, you admit to hospital, treat and release some, move some to ICU if recovery is possible, and for others who haven't died but won't recover, they get hospitalized, released to after-hospital arrangement, and then reappear later as a death, and never share all of that info. I'm spitballing based on some prior info, but that's my hypothesis.
I don't quite get it. What would you do if your hospital were run by nothing but angels, not a bad apple in the bunch, and you were deciding about these exact same patients ~ who "won't recover," "irreparably harmed vax victims," etc. ~ what would the angels running hospitals do??
They do, but don't add up either. Esp. as the definitions of the categories charted are contradictory in themselves, for starters (un-, partially and fully vaccinated):
Oh there is something rotten in Ontario alright and it ain’t the fish.
It actually makes me physically sick to see how many young people have been jabbed.
I foresee tragedy after tragedy this summer. The soccer leagues are huge here, especially youth soccer…I am very scared.
Conclusions are becoming inescapable now. We can work with fear and with that feeling of.feeling physically ill. It is a sign we are psychologically normal at accurate recognition of the presence of abuse for ourselves and our kids. It’s a place to begin. We can learn to let the anger arise and move through us as we channel it through to effect change.
aint many troubles that a man cain't fix
with seven hundred dollars and his thirty ought six?
I can tell you one thing : I will be educating my adult kids to only date uninjected people
We really do need to see such numbers in context of normal (5-10 year average ). On their own they only show us what happened this time .
We will, in 5-10 years.
I suspect if anyone is alive after this ... they'll not be overly concerned about context heheh... they'll be busy hunting for tins of food (see The Road)
When the facts no longer support the LIE.... delete/change the facts...
Easily done when you control the MSM and you can destroy a doctor's career if they dare make a peep.
Now THAT... is power
Yes. It’s power. I used to think of it as control..It has been said ….propaganda’s power lies in its empirical closeness to the truth’… therein lies a problem …
Pretty sure you've commented on this before, but 100% vax rates for everyone over over 70 in a province of 14 million people? That is so very very hard to believe.
Any hypotheses?
I personally have two relatives over age 75 living in Ontario who tell me they have never been vaccinated. There are also some religious denominations that have traditionally opposed all vaccination (Dutch Reformed and Christian Scientist, to be specific). So my hypothesis, if you can call it that, is that these statistics are bogus.
Their distance from reality, and who cooked them up and how, I cannot say.
Also Amish/Mennonites. The rounding error (<0.1%) is <661 persons for 80+, Are there 661+ 80+ unjabbed in Ontario? What is the importance of close to 100% jabbing rate for the gov't? Psychological warfare - the futility of resistance?
bingo. the numbers (cases, deaths, jabbed, effectiveness, amount of time between doses ~ whatever, all of them) have no basis in science or even reality. they are crafted to serve the psyop.
Look to the international order of new liberal distortions being fostered by the World Economic Forum. Their exceptional psychopathology is on display.
I know an 80 year old who has not been vaccinated - there goes 100%
If it's not 100% -- it's probably close...
I know!
This is a great catch! Every ICU visit is associated with hospitalization before or after, but the reverse is not always true. Stands to reason that ICU beds hold those who can be helped, the less fortunate go to hospice or die.
I.e., the proportion of those hospitalized that can be helped, as judged by the expert opinion of ICU administrators, is trending down NOW? After all the jabbing/boosting?
No, I was thinking the complement. The proportion of hospitalized who cannot be helped is trending up. I recall something about hospitals and doctors try to keep their death numbers for unsuccessful procedures low, so they transfer such patients who "fail treatment" out of their facility and off their books by sending them to hospice, onto hospice/palliative care books. So I wonder if there's numbers for those patients who are stashed away to hide their stories from public view. It explains the donut on the data and certainly sounds in character for these soulless demons.
Do they dismiss such ppl home as well?
I don't think so, unless there's some home health involvement. They may be discharged to rehab (not addiction obviously) for very long term that just can't recover, but another care facility that can also start running up the bills for long term care or hospice for short term to ease death. You saw those horrible conditions in Pfizer's "adverse events" list. Think of people with debilitating illness or condition, who won't recover from covid because they're so compromised from the jab. What the hell would you do with such people? ICU is for patients who are progressing. Stacks of people who can't recover, and have a protracted illness can't stay hospitalized forever. If you're evil, up to your eyeballs in the coverup, you admit to hospital, treat and release some, move some to ICU if recovery is possible, and for others who haven't died but won't recover, they get hospitalized, released to after-hospital arrangement, and then reappear later as a death, and never share all of that info. I'm spitballing based on some prior info, but that's my hypothesis.
And I bet they do this for irreparably harmed vax victims too.
That’s a damn good hypothesis…
I don't quite get it. What would you do if your hospital were run by nothing but angels, not a bad apple in the bunch, and you were deciding about these exact same patients ~ who "won't recover," "irreparably harmed vax victims," etc. ~ what would the angels running hospitals do??
Well for starters, any angels would be yelling from the rooftops and try to stop the inflow jabbing ….
These kinds of distortion are true Catch 22’s at the heart of it. Well explained by your further comments. Thanks.
They do, but don't add up either. Esp. as the definitions of the categories charted are contradictory in themselves, for starters (un-, partially and fully vaccinated):
- https://covid-19.ontario.ca/data/case-numbers-and-spread
- https://covid-19.ontario.ca/data/hospitalizations
Orwell is having a field day. Lewis Carroll too.
And PD James… Check ‘Children of Men’