Q. How come? Weren’t the “vaccines” designed to prevent that?
A. “The central problem is that the coronavirus has become more adept at reinfecting people. Variants that are adept at dodging the body’s defenses, and waves of infections two, maybe three times a year — this may be the future of Covid-19, some scientists now fear.”
Martin says he has three law enforcement agencies engaged in the process, with him to prosecute one of the criminal conspiracy architects, and will be announcing further developments on May 22.
"The odds ratio comparing boosted and booster eligible people with prior infection was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.56-1.23)". Not statistically significant then.
"The effectiveness of booster vaccination was 45.8% (95% CI, 20.0-63.2%)...in people with...prior infection". The lower bound of the 95% CI is only 20%!
And of course, the paper doesn't even bother to ask about the side-effects/adverse events. Well, if you don't want to know the answer, don't ask the question.
Honestly this is very confusing. I keep going back to the less than 1% absolute risk reduction reported in the Pfizer trials. Do any of these subsequent studies look at an increase or decrease in the all cause mortality of the injected? More people died in the injected group during the Pfizer trials. Was that a possible indicator?
Q. How come? Weren’t the “vaccines” designed to prevent that?
A. “The central problem is that the coronavirus has become more adept at reinfecting people. Variants that are adept at dodging the body’s defenses, and waves of infections two, maybe three times a year — this may be the future of Covid-19, some scientists now fear.”
"some scientists now fear"
GEERT. 14-mos. ago.
Just got this news from the author of Bailiwick News:
Someone sent me a link to this video today:
https://rumble.com/v153ybt-dr.-david-e-martin-gives-explosive-jaw-dropping-information-in-canadian-zoo.html
Martin says he has three law enforcement agencies engaged in the process, with him to prosecute one of the criminal conspiracy architects, and will be announcing further developments on May 22.
I read enough of your article to under stand....
Was it the new York slimes ?
Butchering language again, imagine that
I read enough to understand they have taken over language, and words can't be taken as truth except if you have a truthfully speaking speaker.
Thanks for speaking the truth, although I wasn't about to exit the control group as it were.
New transcripts in my stack...
Thanks for reading that garbage report you wrote about so I don't have to...
"The odds ratio comparing boosted and booster eligible people with prior infection was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.56-1.23)". Not statistically significant then.
"The effectiveness of booster vaccination was 45.8% (95% CI, 20.0-63.2%)...in people with...prior infection". The lower bound of the 95% CI is only 20%!
And of course, the paper doesn't even bother to ask about the side-effects/adverse events. Well, if you don't want to know the answer, don't ask the question.
Honestly this is very confusing. I keep going back to the less than 1% absolute risk reduction reported in the Pfizer trials. Do any of these subsequent studies look at an increase or decrease in the all cause mortality of the injected? More people died in the injected group during the Pfizer trials. Was that a possible indicator?
President Trump's biggest mistake was Operation Warpspeed and approving ONLY mRNA vaccines. huge mistake, we all will pay for it.
It's the same nonsensical arguments they've been using for the flu shots.
We are very close to total economic collapse - details here (see the comments in particular)
https://ourfiniteworld.com/2022/05/17/is-the-debt-bubble-supporting-the-world-economy-in-danger-of-collapsing
Sometimes I don't know what to say anymore.... The vaccines failed so go ahead and take more of them. 🙄