# Ontario 6th Wave "Plateaued"

### With estimated 6 million infected out of the population of 14.8 million at 90% vaccination rate.

“COVID-19 infections in Ontario appear to have plateaued: head of science table“ (CP24, 2022.04.14): “*Last week, Jüni said the province was likely seeing between 100,000 and 120,000 new cases of COVID-19 each day. Ontario is currently in its sixth wave of the pandemic, driven by the transmissible BA.2 Omicron sub-variant.*

*Jüni noted the slowdown could be attributed to several things, including accumulated immunity through vaccination and infection. He estimated about six million Ontarians have been infected with Omicron since December last year.*“

The 10% unvaccinated (about 1.5 million total) are, therefore:

50-59: 167,000

40-49: 152,000

30-39: 167,000

18-29: 300,000

12-17: 240,000

5-11: 265,000

0-5: 209,000

Considering that these unvaccinated have been clogging the hospitals and morgues for the last 2+ years and have just endured the “cold, dark winter of death”, my bet would be that 90% of these unvaccinated have been exposed to Covid already? That leaves us with 150,000 of unvaccinated without prior Covid immunity by January 2022?

And, according to the official stats from Ontario, the unvaccinated get sick with the rate of 50-70% of those “fully protected”:

13 million * 120-300 cases daily/million = 1,560-3,900 cases daily for the jabbed. Not 100,000-120,000??? So, this statistic in the chart above is good for nothing, thank you very much!

To arrive at 110,000 daily infections, the rate of infection should be 0.8% among the jabbed, every single day, and 0.4% of the unvaccinated. So, in 90 days or so, about 70% (or is it 43%, to be 6 million out of 13 million jabbed?) of the jabbed should have been infected, and 35% of the unvaccinated (540,000! - or maybe 400,000?), just in this Omicron wave (that lasts since New Year). Considering that only about 150,000 of the unvaccinated, by most liberal estimates, would not have natural immunity by now (as 99%+ do in the UK, where this data was being analysed):

it stretches credulity to assume that 540,000 unvaccinated have been infected, or even 400,000.

And 43-70% of the 2x- and 3x-jabbed infected in 3 months, by gov’t own admission? If this isn’t the definition of success of the 95% effective “vaccine”, then I don’t know what is, the breakthrough cases being extremely rare and all…

Oh wait, I stand corrected! It’s “**Hospitalizations** after breakthrough COVID-19 cases 'extremely uncommon': study“ (CTV News, 2022.03.22). Silly me - it’s “hospitalizations”, stupid!

How “extremely uncommon”? Let’s look again at the data from Ontario:

So extremely uncommon as to be 3 times that of the unvaccinated (which include freshly jabbed in this statistic). Assuming that unvaccinated are 1/10 of the vaccinated, this still leaves the rate of the hospitalization to be 30% of those “unprotected”. Not my definition of “extremely uncommon“.

Any way you slice it, it does not add up. But hey, nothing is as it used to be - we are in the “new normal” now (read “insane”).

edited Apr 14I always assume their numbers are 100% untrustworthy. Thank you for laying it out and explaining it to those of us who aren't "data savvy".

How did they get 100% of the 2 eldest groups vaccinated ?