It's really hard to give any credence to data analysis that doesn't have a pure, UNvaccinated category - one that does NOT include any vaccination at all - none of this first 14 days after vaccination as being counted as unvaccinated, or "not Fully" vaccinated. As long as they continue with the subterfuge, I will NOT comply. And because the duplicity has been so egregious, I may never take another vaccine or drug of any kind again.
For some reason, big Pharma has no need for a control group in its grand experiment on the worldwide population administering a poisonous cancer drug. Wonder why that is?
Very early on, that was one of the things that made me pull back. It wasn't that they had no need for a control group - they had a need to eliminate the control group! It was clear well before the vaxx came out we were not dealing with Ebola - and yet, for "humanitarian reasons", everyone had to get injected with a new, never before used in humans (that we know of) secret substance.
The real stats should be # of shots. I really want to see the ones who are at zero. There are, of course, further efforts for shots #4-6, as well as pushing shots to as young as 6 mos old in the US. At least the EU backed off on that, but the medical apartheid still exists.
Not sure if you saw this, but there were some articles that said HIV drugs can help keep COVID at bay. Holy crap, that is just like suggesting you can pick daisies by using a chainsaw.
This made me smile. "They keep trying the best they can" has such a positive vibe, so compassionate and understanding. What they are trying, of course, is to get away with murder.
I love this line; "not fully vaccinated“- Who are these eccentric people? 😄
I have never heard of a drug study where the drug enters your body but the effects don't count, even though it's in your body, until after a period of time. Why don't more people realize how ridiculous this is? 😵💫
Just to clarify, you are saying that when the double-vaxxed got the booster shot, they were classified as not fully vaccinated for the next 14 days. So the higher rate of death in the 'not fully vaxxed' would include the people who were boosted less than 14 days before. I'm wondering if they got sick in those 14 days, but died after that two week period, how would they be classified in the death statistics. What do you think about the case numbers of triple-vaxxed being way higher than unvaxxed or fully vaxxed - almost double?
Add "undervaxxed" and "boosted" (==the true "boosted" stats) and compare with the double-vaxxed. It seems to be getting worse with every shot, according to the official Ontario data. That is my take-away.
"I'm wondering if they got sick in those 14 days, but died after that two week period, how would they be classified in the death statistics": Definitely as "unvaxxed", or in best case, if they feel magnanimous, "undervaxxed". The status is at the time of initial diagnosis and sticks.
As well as the 0-14 day misallocation, the Ontario govt also seems to deliberately overestimate the unjabbed fatality rate by underestimating the size of the unjabbed population according to another good Substack blog.
Great details! Thanks! It looks like Health Ontario did initially classify 0-14 days boosted as boosted, Oct.12 until Dec. 4. Hence the weird shape of the deaths curve for the "boosted" in that period. After that, they started splitting "boosted" into 0-14 days "not fully vaccinated" and "boosted" post 14 days, as both curves started moving more or less in opposing directions until the beginning of January, as the arrival of officially "boosted" was is short supply in that period, mostly contributing to the "not fully vaccinated". After that, they started moving in tandem as both categories became well supplied with new arrivals.
Since you subscribe to him, I assume you read El Gato Malo’s reanalysis of “Bayesian data crime” regarding 0-7 day post-booster infections in the NEJM. If not, it’s a must-read post. He does a great job of quantifying the level of negative effectiveness.
I agree. In my own contribution to this topic, I found slides produced by the Japanese government suggesting the same thing as the now deleted Alberta data. Impressively, rather than delete the slides, the Japanese updated them!
Thanks, interesting data. If you look closely, the peak of deaths of 2x-jabbed is 7 months post 2nd jab. Why is that? Because they count freshly 3x-jabbed (0-14 days) as 2x-jabbed. The 8-day death spike for 3-x jabbed is the 15-23 day leftover effect post 3rd jab (as Alberta/Ontario data illustrates), now correctly attributed to 3x jabbed. Look at Japan's "vaccine doses" dynamics at https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations. about 6 months is the gap in Japan between the up-slopes of the 2nd jab and 3rd jab (don't forget to skip 3-4 weeks to account for the 1st to 2nd jab gap in the initial vaccine doses hump in May 2021. Fits like hand in glove. So, there is no hump in deaths after 150-220 days for the 2x jabbed - it's the effects of the 3rd jab misattributed to the 2x jabbed catching the 3rd jab.
I think it deserves another post. Do you want to write it yourself? Or am I allowed to use your post (with attribution, of course, and a link), to produce something based on it?
Wow Andreas, thank you for your analysis; your work is very much appreciated!
I was watching "the news" awhile ago and, of course, they were pushing the extra booster. Isaac Bogoch admitted, without prompting, "The benefit of this fourth dose is likely not going to be as significant as the benefit of the third dose, but there is probably some benefit". Unbelievable! He spoke for all of 30 seconds and his speech was littered with throat clearing as well as "um" and "uh". Perhaps whatever conscience he used to possess is making it more difficult to twist the truth and push this garbage?
Or just an indicator of lying? It's not that easy as they make it seem - remembering all the previous lies and doing the mental checks as you speak makes one uh and um all the time. Just listen to Justin Trudeau, or better watch Chrystia Freeland, his deputy: it's literally like watching the "What happened in Mozambique?" moment from "Johnny English Reborn" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnny_English_Reborn).
Yes exactly! I've never seen such an obvious 'tell' in a media wh*re's speech and body language, I actually recorded it to make sure I saw it correctly. Right from the beginning, "The benefit of this fourth dose is likely..." clears throat and hand flutters at his chest "not going to be as significant as the third dose..." . I'm no expert, but I could almost see the word LIAR flashing on the screen. His discomfort was obvious; a body language expert would have a field day with this short segment.
If you have access to CP24 (ConstantPropaganda24) they will likely repeat it several times.
And the Johnny English reference was great, thanks!
Thank you for exposing yet more skullduggery. 👏🏻👏🏻😊 It is because of your sharp analysis and vigilance that we the people can see what our Gov’s are doing to us.I will never have another Vaccine,In 2 hrs I have had vaxes for pneumonia, shingles 2x flue,Covid 2 Astra Zeneca 1Pfizer 😳If I could take all of them back I would…Now I have spent 6 months investigating Big Pharma ( bad Pfizer booster problems) I am shocked at the truth, even my little dog is not going to get another vaccination 🐶Woof 😊
They're testing, trying to find out how many jabs it takes before the jabs become lethal...
So if Jab #1, or #2, or #3 dont kill you, They'll keep jabbing...
I think it was Einstein who said something about testing something over and over hoping next time it will produce a different result is a definite indication of insanity. I'm not sure if that applies here...But it has that 'feel' about it
That is what they will use as an excuse - abject ignorance. Gosh, we had no idea, we were trying to save people's lives the best we could. Based on $cience and CDC/EMA/NACI recommendations. NACI?
Hurray! The 2nd booster is available to 60+ as of today n Ontario. I wonder where will they be hiding the bodies, sorry, deaths, of the 2x-boosted this time? They must have a plan?
This was their thing from the get-go. Otherwise no emergency use authorization for the clot shots. They all knew that. And this was their solution to the inconvenient truth on the ground. To give credit where credit is due, it worked well for them.
It's really hard to give any credence to data analysis that doesn't have a pure, UNvaccinated category - one that does NOT include any vaccination at all - none of this first 14 days after vaccination as being counted as unvaccinated, or "not Fully" vaccinated. As long as they continue with the subterfuge, I will NOT comply. And because the duplicity has been so egregious, I may never take another vaccine or drug of any kind again.
I definitely will not. Any. Thanks to them.
I’m not even going to vaccinate my cats again, based on what I’ve learned!
For some reason, big Pharma has no need for a control group in its grand experiment on the worldwide population administering a poisonous cancer drug. Wonder why that is?
Very early on, that was one of the things that made me pull back. It wasn't that they had no need for a control group - they had a need to eliminate the control group! It was clear well before the vaxx came out we were not dealing with Ebola - and yet, for "humanitarian reasons", everyone had to get injected with a new, never before used in humans (that we know of) secret substance.
And STILL a secret substance. When, oh when, will we get the list of ingredients?
Wonder no more. Power >>> corrupted.
Me neither.
🎯"...an EARLY retirement"? More to the point, living long enough to SEE RETIREMENT at all!
The ONLY thing these jabs protect against is longevity. ☝🏻🤨
The real stats should be # of shots. I really want to see the ones who are at zero. There are, of course, further efforts for shots #4-6, as well as pushing shots to as young as 6 mos old in the US. At least the EU backed off on that, but the medical apartheid still exists.
Not sure if you saw this, but there were some articles that said HIV drugs can help keep COVID at bay. Holy crap, that is just like suggesting you can pick daisies by using a chainsaw.
It should. That is the reason they don't provide it, and stopped collecting. It's termed "shenanigans".
What a wonderful solution. Or don't get the mRNA shots in the first place?
Thank you so much for shredding their attempt to mislead to bits.
They keep trying the best they can. But there is always something off with their attempts.
This made me smile. "They keep trying the best they can" has such a positive vibe, so compassionate and understanding. What they are trying, of course, is to get away with murder.
I love this line; "not fully vaccinated“- Who are these eccentric people? 😄
I have never heard of a drug study where the drug enters your body but the effects don't count, even though it's in your body, until after a period of time. Why don't more people realize how ridiculous this is? 😵💫
We slowly do, as a “community”...
I love your sense of humor!
Time to celebrate our unvaccinated-ness, while avoiding any mean spirited behavior of course.
https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/04/10/gov-canada-data-pfizer-vaccinated-suffering-ade/
Just to clarify, you are saying that when the double-vaxxed got the booster shot, they were classified as not fully vaccinated for the next 14 days. So the higher rate of death in the 'not fully vaxxed' would include the people who were boosted less than 14 days before. I'm wondering if they got sick in those 14 days, but died after that two week period, how would they be classified in the death statistics. What do you think about the case numbers of triple-vaxxed being way higher than unvaxxed or fully vaxxed - almost double?
Add "undervaxxed" and "boosted" (==the true "boosted" stats) and compare with the double-vaxxed. It seems to be getting worse with every shot, according to the official Ontario data. That is my take-away.
"I'm wondering if they got sick in those 14 days, but died after that two week period, how would they be classified in the death statistics": Definitely as "unvaxxed", or in best case, if they feel magnanimous, "undervaxxed". The status is at the time of initial diagnosis and sticks.
As well as the 0-14 day misallocation, the Ontario govt also seems to deliberately overestimate the unjabbed fatality rate by underestimating the size of the unjabbed population according to another good Substack blog.
https://jestre.substack.com/p/ontario-and-the-great-denominator?s=w
Great details! Thanks! It looks like Health Ontario did initially classify 0-14 days boosted as boosted, Oct.12 until Dec. 4. Hence the weird shape of the deaths curve for the "boosted" in that period. After that, they started splitting "boosted" into 0-14 days "not fully vaccinated" and "boosted" post 14 days, as both curves started moving more or less in opposing directions until the beginning of January, as the arrival of officially "boosted" was is short supply in that period, mostly contributing to the "not fully vaccinated". After that, they started moving in tandem as both categories became well supplied with new arrivals.
Since you subscribe to him, I assume you read El Gato Malo’s reanalysis of “Bayesian data crime” regarding 0-7 day post-booster infections in the NEJM. If not, it’s a must-read post. He does a great job of quantifying the level of negative effectiveness.
https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/nejm-proves-that-covid-vaccine-study?s=r
Incidentally, this subject was dealt with in my very first substack post on Oct. 27, 2021, based on the data from Ontario and Alberta: https://live2fightanotherday.substack.com/p/hiding-in-plain-sight
The immunity drop and the post-jab vulnerability definitely lasts longer than 7 days, more like 20 days.
I agree. In my own contribution to this topic, I found slides produced by the Japanese government suggesting the same thing as the now deleted Alberta data. Impressively, rather than delete the slides, the Japanese updated them!
https://guygin.substack.com/p/wait-two-weeks-evidence-of-higher?s=w
Thanks, interesting data. If you look closely, the peak of deaths of 2x-jabbed is 7 months post 2nd jab. Why is that? Because they count freshly 3x-jabbed (0-14 days) as 2x-jabbed. The 8-day death spike for 3-x jabbed is the 15-23 day leftover effect post 3rd jab (as Alberta/Ontario data illustrates), now correctly attributed to 3x jabbed. Look at Japan's "vaccine doses" dynamics at https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations. about 6 months is the gap in Japan between the up-slopes of the 2nd jab and 3rd jab (don't forget to skip 3-4 weeks to account for the 1st to 2nd jab gap in the initial vaccine doses hump in May 2021. Fits like hand in glove. So, there is no hump in deaths after 150-220 days for the 2x jabbed - it's the effects of the 3rd jab misattributed to the 2x jabbed catching the 3rd jab.
I think it deserves another post. Do you want to write it yourself? Or am I allowed to use your post (with attribution, of course, and a link), to produce something based on it?
Wow Andreas, thank you for your analysis; your work is very much appreciated!
I was watching "the news" awhile ago and, of course, they were pushing the extra booster. Isaac Bogoch admitted, without prompting, "The benefit of this fourth dose is likely not going to be as significant as the benefit of the third dose, but there is probably some benefit". Unbelievable! He spoke for all of 30 seconds and his speech was littered with throat clearing as well as "um" and "uh". Perhaps whatever conscience he used to possess is making it more difficult to twist the truth and push this garbage?
Or just an indicator of lying? It's not that easy as they make it seem - remembering all the previous lies and doing the mental checks as you speak makes one uh and um all the time. Just listen to Justin Trudeau, or better watch Chrystia Freeland, his deputy: it's literally like watching the "What happened in Mozambique?" moment from "Johnny English Reborn" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnny_English_Reborn).
Yes exactly! I've never seen such an obvious 'tell' in a media wh*re's speech and body language, I actually recorded it to make sure I saw it correctly. Right from the beginning, "The benefit of this fourth dose is likely..." clears throat and hand flutters at his chest "not going to be as significant as the third dose..." . I'm no expert, but I could almost see the word LIAR flashing on the screen. His discomfort was obvious; a body language expert would have a field day with this short segment.
If you have access to CP24 (ConstantPropaganda24) they will likely repeat it several times.
And the Johnny English reference was great, thanks!
Or is it Communist Party 24? Should rename into CP24/7/365?
All of the above! 🤣🤣🤣
Thank you for exposing yet more skullduggery. 👏🏻👏🏻😊 It is because of your sharp analysis and vigilance that we the people can see what our Gov’s are doing to us.I will never have another Vaccine,In 2 hrs I have had vaxes for pneumonia, shingles 2x flue,Covid 2 Astra Zeneca 1Pfizer 😳If I could take all of them back I would…Now I have spent 6 months investigating Big Pharma ( bad Pfizer booster problems) I am shocked at the truth, even my little dog is not going to get another vaccination 🐶Woof 😊
They're testing, trying to find out how many jabs it takes before the jabs become lethal...
So if Jab #1, or #2, or #3 dont kill you, They'll keep jabbing...
I think it was Einstein who said something about testing something over and over hoping next time it will produce a different result is a definite indication of insanity. I'm not sure if that applies here...But it has that 'feel' about it
That is what they will use as an excuse - abject ignorance. Gosh, we had no idea, we were trying to save people's lives the best we could. Based on $cience and CDC/EMA/NACI recommendations. NACI?
Hurray! The 2nd booster is available to 60+ as of today n Ontario. I wonder where will they be hiding the bodies, sorry, deaths, of the 2x-boosted this time? They must have a plan?
Exactly. My reasoning hinges on this fact.
This was their thing from the get-go. Otherwise no emergency use authorization for the clot shots. They all knew that. And this was their solution to the inconvenient truth on the ground. To give credit where credit is due, it worked well for them.