Great research there! Was aware that all this nanotech has been going on for a decade or so but no idea it was in a deployable state with very practical outcomes (like you speculate). So interesting (from a detached perspective) and so frightening (from an autonomous individual's perspective).
What's most descriptively termed the "Rise of the Machines" is a subject I rarely broach with even my most conspiratorially minded friends, due primarily to the extremely high bar an individual must be able to clear to even understand the classified history, operating principles and technological development required -- which you've neatly outlined in these most recent articles.
Three cheers for even attempting to take on this most challenging subject, only taken seriously by the what the uninitiated refer to as the tinfoil hat crowd. That said, it has been of personal interest for the last 25 years or so, having spent some time working in the process automation and defense tech fields in a "previous life".
It's disappointing to see you giving this tale some life. It's wrong on many levels.
The Microsoft patent application is for a scheme to monitor peoples actions and reward them for actions you want them to do. It could be tied to gaming, employee productivity or social credit applications. (Did you mess with your gaming console more aggressively than your opponent so you win the match? Are you being a good little slave and typing at your computer all day? Are you exercising the amount the party requires each day?) It isn't in any way related to sending information into or out of a body.
As for your implementation description:
* It's unlikely that the nanonodes and transducers you describe could be directed to any specific place in the body let alone pass the blood brain barrier. Pfizer hasn't been able to control where the spike proteins go and most molecules (including Ivermectin) can't pass the blood-brain barrier.
*Routers are complex things that can't (at anything like current technology) be reduced to the sizes required to pass through a syringe.
*For the injection site to act as an antenna it would have to have elements protruding from the surface of the skin. That's assuming you could attach things under the skin that were capable of receiving information in the first place.
Signals don't pass through animal tissue very well. That's why Apple had problems with one of their phone versions when people held it "wrong". Their fingers blocked the signal to and from the internal antennas. If they couldn't get data in and out of a phone with its monster battery due to the absorption by fingers how are nano anything (that rely on miniscule energy harvested from chemicals in your blood) going to transmit signals from one to another through multiple inches of human tissue.
I happen to know quite a bit about artificial ears. State of the art technology to implant electrodes in the cochlea, and the electronics required to channel signals from external body packs (that pick up the sound and process it) to those electrodes is pre-stone age compared to what you are suggesting. On top of that, the technology to transcode the audio into signals that drive the electrodes still requires lots of high tech hardware just to get a few percent of the audio resolution.
I'm really disappointed in you for not doing better research on this. I know you say you don't believe it and you are only describing how it MIGHT work. Describing some possible workable portions without covering the grossly unworkable parts isn't good reporting or good commentary.
The danger in what you wrote isn't just that some people may believe it and get worked into a panic over imaginary hobgoblins. The bigger issue is that the mainstream will point to articles like this to discredit you and the others in the alternative media. They can use material like this to show everyone else that we're a bunch of crazies.
Not directed to a specific place - randomly dispersed. Do not put words in my mouth. It’s a thought-provoking exercise. But if GQDs, graphene oxide/hydroxide particles, and superparamagnets are being reported in the vials or in vaccinees’ arms, then this deserves attention and investigation. Not a consensus (experts agree style) that it is impossible because it’s not possible - real investigation.
I agree that the other things present in the vaccines need to be investigated. They may well be there for nefarious purposes. I wouldn't put anything past the scumballs behind these vaccines. I just don't believe the technology described here is anything close to feasible.
Klaus Schwab loves this transhumanist stuff. Even if it's not feasible, many scientists are prostitutes and will promise the moon if you throw money at them. The globalist elite cabal may be morons but they're also ultra-rich. So what really matters is what THEY believe. Remember these are the same people who thought the Singularity was imminent or that self-driving cars would happen anytime soon.
I just want to know what’s in the jabs, why is it so difficult to get any verifiable info? There are constituents in Pfizer jabs that Pfizer lists without saying what they are. Steve Kirsch promised to analyze lots of vials, but so far mum.
With the Singularity I should not be too hasty in judgment. There were some forecasts of timelines convergence (viz. Looking Glass; Yellow Cube) projected to materialize by 2030. For all I know it might signify the Second Coming, and there would be no escaping it. The diabolists probably feel they are fighting for survival, and still believe they can win. So there would be a good reason for the rush: Apocalypse this decade.
I can imagine that "they" might seize the opportunity to conduct some massive-scale unethical experiments "on the side" so to speak, but... no autopsies are being done. How are they supposed to record the results?
edit: I guess they might figure they can experiment freely on the survivors after the Big Reset, once we're all settled in to the new regime? Just getting a head start on those long-term studies?
No autopsies is an overstatement - there have been some (notably by Prof. Burkhardt in Germany). And how can you be sure no autopsies are being performed "on the side"? The supply of corpses seems big enough to get away with some body snatching.
As I said: lots of nascent technology to go around and a wild Sci-Fi theory at this point. But with the speed the things are moving, it may be there in 5 or 10 years, or rather will be. While ppl roll up their sleeves like zombies and let the certifiably evil forces inject them with anything.
You need to understand the crowd here does not shy away from speculation, mainstream be damned. This is an exercise in discovery, and the discourse must flow freely. Progress is always achieved by proposing how things might work, resolving the unworkable parts, and finding solutions. Or not, in which case one needs to set out on a different path, which is fine.
Only wusses worry about factcheckers and similar vermin. Do you think Halley was crazy when he proposed the hollow earth?
The curious individuals will read the scientific articles, go to LaQuinta Columna's site to check their latests discoveries on these "vaccine's" nanostructures and decide for themselves. Spike proteins are known to bypass the brain's barrier. 5G technology is powerful and the longterm effects on humans remain unknown. They could indeed activate those "vaccines" nanostructures.
However, the most important thing nowadays is to give as much informations trails as possible on the "vaccines". So Andreas, as many other individuals and groups, is doing a good job! :)
Could nanostructures in the vaccines be used to kill people sometime down the road. Possibly. Could they be self assembled into structures that could do specific things within a human body? No.
Is 5G radiation dangerous? Possibly. There hasn't been any real research into it that I know of. Can 5G be combined with whatever garbage is in these vaccines? No, there's no way enough energy could reach the nanowhatevers to make them to anything, let alone something specific.
When I mention self-assembly, I think in terms of self-assembly in the manufacturing process. Maybe except for the fractal antenna in the jab site that might crystallize later with the infrared laser stimulation. Anyhow, all unexplained things must be either verifiably disproven, or else logically explained. Don’t expect Pfizer or FDA do it for us in 75 years. Where are those studies when we need them?
I have a hard time reading through a long list of alleged Biden regime´s failures without mentioning its biggest success in biological warfare: immigration. PP seems to get involved with Q-type convoluted logic I have little time for, being a fan of Occam´s razor.
Oh man. I don't want to doxx myself too hard, but you've sort of nerd-sniped me with this one. I studied self-assembling structures in some depth... read dozens of articles, wrote software... I recall even "self-assembling" my initials out of flakey little simulated particles for a class assignment. I could post a whole bibliography, but I don't think it would be prudent... or all that relevant, honestly. There's a lot of research here, it's a whole field.
Short story is, I'm skeptical about how practical any of this stuff is, especially within a live human body. If you want to self-assemble some clot-inducing haystack mess of graphene, or maybe even some sort of primitive RF antenna, sure, I can see that. But there are much more straightforward ways to quietly kill people with injections. Self-assembly of nontrivial mechanisms or circuits? In vivo? Nah, not any time soon.
Can't see how that would work either. But, as I said earlier, it is much easier to destroy than to create. And the magnetoelectric transducers are a real thing, and carbon nanotubes can vibrate (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19492820/ "Carbon nanotubes as ultrahigh quality factor mechanical resonators") and dissipate energy at radio frequencies, doing neurostimulation. If it's even random, imagine your brain going haywire under a crowd-control electromagnetic gun that will need much less energy at that point, or will have a wider radius. A useful thing in itself. "They" seem to be hell-bent at this point to eventually get everybody with their jabs. This means "they" have a very good reason for that. We must find out what it is.
Occam's explanation for total vaxx uniformity is just elimination of the control group. And then, if booster N+1 keeps you from getting sick from booster N, you've got a perpetual subscription model to underwrite the vaxxpass, which is AFAICT the real purpose of this madness.
I give you there is a precedent for control group elimination already, on a small scale. But how can vax uniformity be achieved with several different models of the poison, and with the continuously promulgated target of 70% vaxxed?
Thank you for noting these amazing developments in the last few decades. Distributed digital assets (cryptographically secured currencies included) and decentralized settlement systems are often seen by futurists as the crucial "oil" that will be needed to monetize transactions (state changes) that enable or disable certain things.
One utility of this this model is having the ability to control the amount of cycles a specific construction can last. "Recharging" something may be pre-conditioned on getting a payment.
My obvious pointer here is that our systems will be as good as the mathematical work done in understanding the security of the cryptographic systems people will inevitably deploy.
´Digital electronics are so powerful that they dominate our daily lives. When scaled down, the difference between digital & living systems blurs, so that you have an opportunity to do things that sound science fiction–things that people have only dreamed about.´ - Charles M. Lieber
An interesting and well written article!
Self-assembling nanobots....
https://www.expandingawarenessrelations.com/shocking-images-of-nanosensors-nanowires-in-the-vaccines-dr-pablo-campra-the-graphene-system-can-self-assembly-once-injected-in-the-body/
https://t.me/georgenews/2588
https://t.me/robinmg/13065
https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf;jsessionid=B2139E349001D3D800C049B884ECA08F.wapp1nC?docId=CN296257541&_cid=P12-KBN0Z6-17091-1
Thanks for the pointers,Barry!
Great research there! Was aware that all this nanotech has been going on for a decade or so but no idea it was in a deployable state with very practical outcomes (like you speculate). So interesting (from a detached perspective) and so frightening (from an autonomous individual's perspective).
What's most descriptively termed the "Rise of the Machines" is a subject I rarely broach with even my most conspiratorially minded friends, due primarily to the extremely high bar an individual must be able to clear to even understand the classified history, operating principles and technological development required -- which you've neatly outlined in these most recent articles.
Three cheers for even attempting to take on this most challenging subject, only taken seriously by the what the uninitiated refer to as the tinfoil hat crowd. That said, it has been of personal interest for the last 25 years or so, having spent some time working in the process automation and defense tech fields in a "previous life".
Thanks! I have ended up with a slight headache by the time I've finished. But we are having fun, at least, aren't we?
It's disappointing to see you giving this tale some life. It's wrong on many levels.
The Microsoft patent application is for a scheme to monitor peoples actions and reward them for actions you want them to do. It could be tied to gaming, employee productivity or social credit applications. (Did you mess with your gaming console more aggressively than your opponent so you win the match? Are you being a good little slave and typing at your computer all day? Are you exercising the amount the party requires each day?) It isn't in any way related to sending information into or out of a body.
As for your implementation description:
* It's unlikely that the nanonodes and transducers you describe could be directed to any specific place in the body let alone pass the blood brain barrier. Pfizer hasn't been able to control where the spike proteins go and most molecules (including Ivermectin) can't pass the blood-brain barrier.
*Routers are complex things that can't (at anything like current technology) be reduced to the sizes required to pass through a syringe.
*For the injection site to act as an antenna it would have to have elements protruding from the surface of the skin. That's assuming you could attach things under the skin that were capable of receiving information in the first place.
Signals don't pass through animal tissue very well. That's why Apple had problems with one of their phone versions when people held it "wrong". Their fingers blocked the signal to and from the internal antennas. If they couldn't get data in and out of a phone with its monster battery due to the absorption by fingers how are nano anything (that rely on miniscule energy harvested from chemicals in your blood) going to transmit signals from one to another through multiple inches of human tissue.
I happen to know quite a bit about artificial ears. State of the art technology to implant electrodes in the cochlea, and the electronics required to channel signals from external body packs (that pick up the sound and process it) to those electrodes is pre-stone age compared to what you are suggesting. On top of that, the technology to transcode the audio into signals that drive the electrodes still requires lots of high tech hardware just to get a few percent of the audio resolution.
I'm really disappointed in you for not doing better research on this. I know you say you don't believe it and you are only describing how it MIGHT work. Describing some possible workable portions without covering the grossly unworkable parts isn't good reporting or good commentary.
The danger in what you wrote isn't just that some people may believe it and get worked into a panic over imaginary hobgoblins. The bigger issue is that the mainstream will point to articles like this to discredit you and the others in the alternative media. They can use material like this to show everyone else that we're a bunch of crazies.
Not directed to a specific place - randomly dispersed. Do not put words in my mouth. It’s a thought-provoking exercise. But if GQDs, graphene oxide/hydroxide particles, and superparamagnets are being reported in the vials or in vaccinees’ arms, then this deserves attention and investigation. Not a consensus (experts agree style) that it is impossible because it’s not possible - real investigation.
I agree that the other things present in the vaccines need to be investigated. They may well be there for nefarious purposes. I wouldn't put anything past the scumballs behind these vaccines. I just don't believe the technology described here is anything close to feasible.
Klaus Schwab loves this transhumanist stuff. Even if it's not feasible, many scientists are prostitutes and will promise the moon if you throw money at them. The globalist elite cabal may be morons but they're also ultra-rich. So what really matters is what THEY believe. Remember these are the same people who thought the Singularity was imminent or that self-driving cars would happen anytime soon.
I just want to know what’s in the jabs, why is it so difficult to get any verifiable info? There are constituents in Pfizer jabs that Pfizer lists without saying what they are. Steve Kirsch promised to analyze lots of vials, but so far mum.
With the Singularity I should not be too hasty in judgment. There were some forecasts of timelines convergence (viz. Looking Glass; Yellow Cube) projected to materialize by 2030. For all I know it might signify the Second Coming, and there would be no escaping it. The diabolists probably feel they are fighting for survival, and still believe they can win. So there would be a good reason for the rush: Apocalypse this decade.
I can imagine that "they" might seize the opportunity to conduct some massive-scale unethical experiments "on the side" so to speak, but... no autopsies are being done. How are they supposed to record the results?
edit: I guess they might figure they can experiment freely on the survivors after the Big Reset, once we're all settled in to the new regime? Just getting a head start on those long-term studies?
Looks more like a deliberate act and a necessary element of their plan. "For kicks" would be too frivolous, don't discount them too cheaply.
No autopsies is an overstatement - there have been some (notably by Prof. Burkhardt in Germany). And how can you be sure no autopsies are being performed "on the side"? The supply of corpses seems big enough to get away with some body snatching.
As I said: lots of nascent technology to go around and a wild Sci-Fi theory at this point. But with the speed the things are moving, it may be there in 5 or 10 years, or rather will be. While ppl roll up their sleeves like zombies and let the certifiably evil forces inject them with anything.
You need to understand the crowd here does not shy away from speculation, mainstream be damned. This is an exercise in discovery, and the discourse must flow freely. Progress is always achieved by proposing how things might work, resolving the unworkable parts, and finding solutions. Or not, in which case one needs to set out on a different path, which is fine.
Only wusses worry about factcheckers and similar vermin. Do you think Halley was crazy when he proposed the hollow earth?
The curious individuals will read the scientific articles, go to LaQuinta Columna's site to check their latests discoveries on these "vaccine's" nanostructures and decide for themselves. Spike proteins are known to bypass the brain's barrier. 5G technology is powerful and the longterm effects on humans remain unknown. They could indeed activate those "vaccines" nanostructures.
However, the most important thing nowadays is to give as much informations trails as possible on the "vaccines". So Andreas, as many other individuals and groups, is doing a good job! :)
Thank you!
Could nanostructures in the vaccines be used to kill people sometime down the road. Possibly. Could they be self assembled into structures that could do specific things within a human body? No.
Is 5G radiation dangerous? Possibly. There hasn't been any real research into it that I know of. Can 5G be combined with whatever garbage is in these vaccines? No, there's no way enough energy could reach the nanowhatevers to make them to anything, let alone something specific.
I agree with this.
When I mention self-assembly, I think in terms of self-assembly in the manufacturing process. Maybe except for the fractal antenna in the jab site that might crystallize later with the infrared laser stimulation. Anyhow, all unexplained things must be either verifiably disproven, or else logically explained. Don’t expect Pfizer or FDA do it for us in 75 years. Where are those studies when we need them?
and how do we interpret Fauci's statements to the House (referring to EO 13887) :
"the President signed the Executive Order on
Modernizing Influenza Vaccines in the United States to Promote National Security and Public
Health on September 19, 2019. Broadly, the Executive Order directs BARDA, CDC, NIH, and
FDA to accelerate the adoption of improved influenza vaccine technologies. In alignment with
the goals of the Executive Order, NIAID is conducting and supporting research to develop state-
of-the-art vaccine platform technologies that could be used to develop universal influenza
vaccines as well as to improve the speed and agility of the influenza vaccine manufacturing
process. These platform technologies include DNA, messenger RNA (mRNA), virus-like particles, vector-based, and self-assembling nanoparticle vaccines."
Here's a bit of a rabbit hole on that topic... caveat emptor.
http://patelpatriot.substack.com/p/devolution-part-15
I have a hard time reading through a long list of alleged Biden regime´s failures without mentioning its biggest success in biological warfare: immigration. PP seems to get involved with Q-type convoluted logic I have little time for, being a fan of Occam´s razor.
also, if you haven't checked out Moderna Patent US10703789, it's interesting
https://www.modernatx.com/patents
for example:
-Nanotubes 214:30
-Self-Assembled Nanoparticles 218:15
-Gels and Hydrogels 219:65
Oh man. I don't want to doxx myself too hard, but you've sort of nerd-sniped me with this one. I studied self-assembling structures in some depth... read dozens of articles, wrote software... I recall even "self-assembling" my initials out of flakey little simulated particles for a class assignment. I could post a whole bibliography, but I don't think it would be prudent... or all that relevant, honestly. There's a lot of research here, it's a whole field.
Short story is, I'm skeptical about how practical any of this stuff is, especially within a live human body. If you want to self-assemble some clot-inducing haystack mess of graphene, or maybe even some sort of primitive RF antenna, sure, I can see that. But there are much more straightforward ways to quietly kill people with injections. Self-assembly of nontrivial mechanisms or circuits? In vivo? Nah, not any time soon.
Never wrote this, must be your idea. About in vivo.
You're too kind. :-)
But I can't really take credit. I must have gotten carried away... maybe it was Carrie Madej? You know, with the "hydras"?
Self-assembling nanobots are too sci-fi for me, that's all I'm saying.
Can't see how that would work either. But, as I said earlier, it is much easier to destroy than to create. And the magnetoelectric transducers are a real thing, and carbon nanotubes can vibrate (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19492820/ "Carbon nanotubes as ultrahigh quality factor mechanical resonators") and dissipate energy at radio frequencies, doing neurostimulation. If it's even random, imagine your brain going haywire under a crowd-control electromagnetic gun that will need much less energy at that point, or will have a wider radius. A useful thing in itself. "They" seem to be hell-bent at this point to eventually get everybody with their jabs. This means "they" have a very good reason for that. We must find out what it is.
Occam's explanation for total vaxx uniformity is just elimination of the control group. And then, if booster N+1 keeps you from getting sick from booster N, you've got a perpetual subscription model to underwrite the vaxxpass, which is AFAICT the real purpose of this madness.
I give you there is a precedent for control group elimination already, on a small scale. But how can vax uniformity be achieved with several different models of the poison, and with the continuously promulgated target of 70% vaxxed?
Hydras are real: bacteriophages? Beautiful "critters": https://www.britannica.com/video/72951/cycle-infection-results-host-cell-death-release
Possible in many ways even in unjabbed:
https://www.resonancescience.org/blog/Mapping-Magnetite-in-the-Human-Brain
External forces can form wiring:
https://youtu.be/w1d0Lg6wuvc
Very cool! Thanks!
Wow, thanks for this great well researched article. I like your tone as well, open curiosity. 👍🏼
Thank you for noting these amazing developments in the last few decades. Distributed digital assets (cryptographically secured currencies included) and decentralized settlement systems are often seen by futurists as the crucial "oil" that will be needed to monetize transactions (state changes) that enable or disable certain things.
One utility of this this model is having the ability to control the amount of cycles a specific construction can last. "Recharging" something may be pre-conditioned on getting a payment.
My obvious pointer here is that our systems will be as good as the mathematical work done in understanding the security of the cryptographic systems people will inevitably deploy.
So mistakes could be "interesting" to say the least.
´Digital electronics are so powerful that they dominate our daily lives. When scaled down, the difference between digital & living systems blurs, so that you have an opportunity to do things that sound science fiction–things that people have only dreamed about.´ - Charles M. Lieber
The trail is hot on my top Harvardian bugbear.
https://vaxxter.com/from-espionage-to-tax-evasion-charles-lieber-found-guilty-on-all-six-counts/
"The patents are both brilliant and frightening."
Liquid Computing, Cyborg Tissue, Injectable Neural Links, Nanoscale Wires