Making people feel comfortable is not a societal benefit. When the comfort is with respect to mental illness, doubly so. When the mental illness was induced by those same authorities, triple.
Certainly the death and injury rate for younger people was not a "social good" out of this. Myocarditis was never on anyone's lips before this.
My own kids have avoided community college due to asinine mandates. The supposed most accessible place for learning turned into bureaucratic hoops to jump thru, only to have the religious exemption cancelled just before classes were to start. Everything was "inclusive" until it wasn't.
I think we must somehow keep up the chatter. This vaccine, that vaccine.. they're all over-hyped and under-studied.
As one who has been suspicous of vaccines for a long time, I hope to never, ever again hear the phrase "one in a million" used to describe vaccine injury. Covid vaccines blew that out of the water. We need to keep it there
If there's no will among the population, there can't be a strengthening of the Charter (which has proven to be less than useless as it gives too much leeway to gutless judges with predetermined bias) or reforms of what just happened.
There absolutely needs to be a public inquiry but I get the feeling the people will take a 'we want to forget' posture. So it will be left to a small minority to make noise and make this happen by persisting because I agree. We must make people be held accountable.
If the mandate’s purpose was simply to get needles into arms, then they won’t be rolled out again in any meaningful way as the damage has already been done.
It seems the cabal is relenting a bit on mandates for those that withstood this onslaught, satisfied with the numbers that received "the mark of the beast" and finishing their job on them now. All according to the Revelation, and Vanden Boschee:
14: "9 And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand,
10 The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb:
11 And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name.
12 Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus."
How about this article that explains the possibility of these continued kill shots ,in my opinion . Wonder how many people in the powers that be even read any alternative view points ?
Wish these guys who understand the "real science" could debate but as you know , it really isn't about the science any longer . Are you familiar with C J Hopkins ? Here is one of his many interviews with Catherine Fitts explaining in layman's terms how its about the military and finances . Maybe you have seen this one : https://cjhopkins.substack.com/p/we-need-to-talk-about-mr-global-part/comments
Thanks, haven't seen this latest interview. As the appetite for the boosters wanes even faster that the boosters themselves, the "authorities" are bound to face real backlash, and mostly from the formerly ardent supporters of the jabs, them being ardent. And as vanden Boschee's grim predictions pan out in the near future, we are in for an interesting show,
Be interesting to watch more nudging in the direction of what they will withhold for people who don't want to comply with the latest injection . Seems to me they did a great job firing people and now they need all the arms of kids to be part of their system. Watch the number comply with "for the good of us all " propaganda . Keep the cash flowing or we'll all be on cash tokens like the slaves we are becoming while a great many continue to slumber : think Geert and I have similar gene structures.
Policy makers have a duty to carefully consider the effect that mandating vaccination could have on public confidence and public trust, particularly on confidence in the scientific community and vaccination generally (10). If such a policy threatens to undermine confidence and public trust, it might affect both vaccine uptake and adherence to other important public health measures, which can have an enduring effect (11).
In particular, the coercive power that governments or institutions display in a programme that constrains or eliminates choice could have unintended negative consequences for at-risk or marginalized populations (12). High priority should therefore be given to threats to public trust and confidence among historically disadvantaged minority populations, ensuring that cultural considerations are taken into account. Vaccine hesitancy may be stronger in such populations and may not be restricted to concerns about safety and effectiveness (13) because mistrust in authorities may be rooted in histories of unethical medical, public health and other policies and practices as well as structural inequity (10). Such populations may regard mandatory
vaccination as another form of inequity or oppression that makes it more difficult for them to access jobs and essential services (14).
At the same time, policy makers should consider the effect that not mandating vaccination could have on public confidence, public trust and inequity, as well as on various important freedoms. Public confidence and trust may be undermined, for example, if steps known to protect the public from harm are not taken as part of the pandemic response, particularly if they are not implemented in settings with populations that are in vulnerable situations (e.g. congregate settings in which care is provided to older adults and hospitals).
The extent to which mandatory vaccination policies accommodate conscientious objection may also affect public trust (15). There should, however, be strict scientific and prudential limits to appeals for accommodation or “conscientious objection”, especially when such accommodation might be used by individuals to ‘free ride’ the public health good of community protection (i.e., taking advantage of the benefit without contributing towards the cost of its production) or if they threaten public health and others’ right not to be infected with a virulent infectious disease (16, 17)
Public health was simply the excuse they used to exert the control they always wanted. Next time it will likely be the climate -- Europe is barreling full-bore into a terrible winter, yet they're charging forward with the green agenda anyway.
Making people feel comfortable is not a societal benefit. When the comfort is with respect to mental illness, doubly so. When the mental illness was induced by those same authorities, triple.
Certainly the death and injury rate for younger people was not a "social good" out of this. Myocarditis was never on anyone's lips before this.
My own kids have avoided community college due to asinine mandates. The supposed most accessible place for learning turned into bureaucratic hoops to jump thru, only to have the religious exemption cancelled just before classes were to start. Everything was "inclusive" until it wasn't.
It sounds to me like your kids don’t need college “to make them smarter”. They already ARE! Keep their critical thinking skills intact.
I think we must somehow keep up the chatter. This vaccine, that vaccine.. they're all over-hyped and under-studied.
As one who has been suspicous of vaccines for a long time, I hope to never, ever again hear the phrase "one in a million" used to describe vaccine injury. Covid vaccines blew that out of the water. We need to keep it there
If there's no will among the population, there can't be a strengthening of the Charter (which has proven to be less than useless as it gives too much leeway to gutless judges with predetermined bias) or reforms of what just happened.
There absolutely needs to be a public inquiry but I get the feeling the people will take a 'we want to forget' posture. So it will be left to a small minority to make noise and make this happen by persisting because I agree. We must make people be held accountable.
You obviously haven’t read this yet: https://voiceforscienceandsolidarity.substack.com/p/it-is-5-past-12
Geert Vanden Bossche makes a very strong case that round two is about to commence, and it will be far more impactful than round one was.
Already did. Agrees perfectly with what we see in Canada at the moment: https://live2fightanotherday.substack.com/p/cience-fiction-in-canada-covid-19
Act two of the "pandemic" may be coming, but the mandates won't be justified or have a chance to be enforced.
Indeed you did. I missed that post.
If the mandate’s purpose was simply to get needles into arms, then they won’t be rolled out again in any meaningful way as the damage has already been done.
It seems the cabal is relenting a bit on mandates for those that withstood this onslaught, satisfied with the numbers that received "the mark of the beast" and finishing their job on them now. All according to the Revelation, and Vanden Boschee:
14: "9 And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand,
10 The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb:
11 And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name.
12 Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus."
How about this article that explains the possibility of these continued kill shots ,in my opinion . Wonder how many people in the powers that be even read any alternative view points ?
https://voiceforscienceandsolidarity.substack.com/p/it-is-5-past-12/comments
Listening to it as you write!
Wish these guys who understand the "real science" could debate but as you know , it really isn't about the science any longer . Are you familiar with C J Hopkins ? Here is one of his many interviews with Catherine Fitts explaining in layman's terms how its about the military and finances . Maybe you have seen this one : https://cjhopkins.substack.com/p/we-need-to-talk-about-mr-global-part/comments
Thanks, haven't seen this latest interview. As the appetite for the boosters wanes even faster that the boosters themselves, the "authorities" are bound to face real backlash, and mostly from the formerly ardent supporters of the jabs, them being ardent. And as vanden Boschee's grim predictions pan out in the near future, we are in for an interesting show,
Be interesting to watch more nudging in the direction of what they will withhold for people who don't want to comply with the latest injection . Seems to me they did a great job firing people and now they need all the arms of kids to be part of their system. Watch the number comply with "for the good of us all " propaganda . Keep the cash flowing or we'll all be on cash tokens like the slaves we are becoming while a great many continue to slumber : think Geert and I have similar gene structures.
Related:
WHO COVID-19 Ethics and Governance Working Group report, May 2022
COVID-19 and mandatory vaccination: Ethical considerations
https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-Policy-brief-Mandatory-vaccination-2022.1
Section 5, Public Trust:
Policy makers have a duty to carefully consider the effect that mandating vaccination could have on public confidence and public trust, particularly on confidence in the scientific community and vaccination generally (10). If such a policy threatens to undermine confidence and public trust, it might affect both vaccine uptake and adherence to other important public health measures, which can have an enduring effect (11).
In particular, the coercive power that governments or institutions display in a programme that constrains or eliminates choice could have unintended negative consequences for at-risk or marginalized populations (12). High priority should therefore be given to threats to public trust and confidence among historically disadvantaged minority populations, ensuring that cultural considerations are taken into account. Vaccine hesitancy may be stronger in such populations and may not be restricted to concerns about safety and effectiveness (13) because mistrust in authorities may be rooted in histories of unethical medical, public health and other policies and practices as well as structural inequity (10). Such populations may regard mandatory
vaccination as another form of inequity or oppression that makes it more difficult for them to access jobs and essential services (14).
At the same time, policy makers should consider the effect that not mandating vaccination could have on public confidence, public trust and inequity, as well as on various important freedoms. Public confidence and trust may be undermined, for example, if steps known to protect the public from harm are not taken as part of the pandemic response, particularly if they are not implemented in settings with populations that are in vulnerable situations (e.g. congregate settings in which care is provided to older adults and hospitals).
The extent to which mandatory vaccination policies accommodate conscientious objection may also affect public trust (15). There should, however, be strict scientific and prudential limits to appeals for accommodation or “conscientious objection”, especially when such accommodation might be used by individuals to ‘free ride’ the public health good of community protection (i.e., taking advantage of the benefit without contributing towards the cost of its production) or if they threaten public health and others’ right not to be infected with a virulent infectious disease (16, 17)
They want to have their cake, and to eat it too, LOL!
Public health was simply the excuse they used to exert the control they always wanted. Next time it will likely be the climate -- Europe is barreling full-bore into a terrible winter, yet they're charging forward with the green agenda anyway.
I think they've achieved a lot with that- logistically, financially, and ideologically. Wins all around.
...and a food crisis.
Do not comply! You'll feel better 😊
I like that term, the socialization of compliance.