19 Comments

Would they dare? They will dare, but now that Isreal is waking up, the people will dare to refuse.

Did you see this? https://jessicar.substack.com/p/ilana-rachel-daniel-is-a-heroine

Expand full comment
author
Feb 17, 2022·edited Feb 17, 2022Author

No I didn’t up till now, thanks! Very insightful overview. “Trudeau, being the coward that he is, wouldn’t dare to perform this one man show without someone very powerful backing him”.

Expand full comment

Can you clarify what you mean by "fewer and fewer jobs in subsequent job campaigns are causing increasingly more deaths per shot".

There are two ways to interpret this. For people who think the vaccine works, less people getting vaccinated would lead to more deaths. (I guess we would need to know how many vaccinated and unvaccinated people are dying during this recent wave).

There is evidence of original antigenic sin in the uk (and possibly antibody dependent enhancement or disease enhancement) so for those who think these things are occurring, more deaths would be expected with each shot, even when less people are taking the shot. Monthly raw data numbers of vaccinated and unvaccinated hospitalizations and deaths would tell us the whole story. I haven't heard much about those numbers coming out of Israel lately.

Expand full comment
author

Good point. But, if jabs were to work, the more vaccinated there already is, the better they are protected already, shouldn't it be so? Second, the jab drives are the leading factor to the deaths, from almost day 1, on so many examples from multiple countries that clearly didn't have any Covid wave issue at the time of administration. I won't out-argument the official line, as it needs no arguments. But if one is willing to think for oneself, I am providing the evidence. In case of Israel, clearly, the shots are causing increasingly more damage as the shot effects accumulate in their recipients with each subsequent shot. It's ADE, plus "reverse AIDS" (CD8+ cell depletion, vs CD4+ in "direct" AIDS), plus OAS, plus outright damage and toxicity from the S spike and LNPs, if not also from graphene oxide generously thrown in "for good measure".

Expand full comment

Ah, I see, even if fewer people get the jab, it's the accumulation effects of multiple jabs, plus the ill effects of any jab, adding up. 👍🏼

Expand full comment
author

Thanks. I haven't heard much about lipid nanoparticle toxicity, just about how LNP might contain a metal, possibly or probably graphene oxide, which many also think is toxic to the body. Maybe the toxicity that he refers to in this video is from the metal in it...?

Expand full comment
author
Feb 18, 2022·edited Feb 18, 2022Liked by Andreas Oehler

This is wonderful, thank you very much. This really adds to my understanding. 🙏👍🏼💕

I've heard that there are billions of nanoparticles in each shot, but I can't find any literature that states that. Do you have that information?

Expand full comment

It is actually the Law of Diminishing Returns - after the peak, the more you put in, the less you get out. I meant economics.

Expand full comment
author

That one surely is. But this one returns more dead with less effort with every subsequent jab, hence the increasing returns. I know my vaccinology.

Expand full comment

Very droll.

You sure know your v-logy.

Expand full comment