Yes the minor perturbation in vulnerable even if you force vaccinate the rest is a very good point. I think it important to repeat the wording of their conclusion (forgot if you did in your first post — sorry to repeat if so):
“…the choice of some individuals to refuse vaccination is likely to
affect the health and safety of vaccinated people in a manner dis-
proportionate to the fraction of unvaccinated people in the
population. Risk among unvaccinated people cannot be con-
sidered self-regarding, and considerations around equity and
justice for people who do choose to be vaccinated, as well as
those who choose not to be, need to be considered in the formu-
lation of vaccination policy. ”
They basically as you point out use ideal numbers to reach conclusions not at all reachable now (i.e. NEGATIVE efficacy now not 80% — the infecting likely goes vaxxed to vaxxed at this point, or vaxxed to unvaxxed were it not for robust natural immunity). They are very wrong about the use of their words “choose” here, vaccinations were/are forced through intimidation and loss of civil rights. They assert this work justifies eliminating bodily autonomy. This paper was written conclusion first.
So what is the shot rule for Canada now? Is it still just two and done, then you can fly and rejoin society like a good soldier? If that is case, you could have received the two shots more than a year ago and be completely depleted of shot antibodies by now. Which makes you medically in the same situation as being the dreaded unshotted.
Why don't the powers that be require 4 shots to be able to rejoin society? When will stupid workplaces drop their shot mandates or require 4 shots for employees? Either do it full-force, and follow the medical science or don't do it at all. Two shots is completely, utterly worthless (and so is 2,3,4,5,6, ad inifity), but is still used as a compliance tool and nobody seems to care.
Thank you for laying this out so well for us. The insanity of the Canadian “study” is just too much. Talk about tortured assumptions to reach a forgone conclusion. Holy spit. No immunity for unjabbed!!? Wow. 80% jab efficacy (pipedream and they know it). Unreal.
Gee, it almost seems like both Germany and Canada have financial ties with the companies that make the vaccine technology! 🤣
Yes the minor perturbation in vulnerable even if you force vaccinate the rest is a very good point. I think it important to repeat the wording of their conclusion (forgot if you did in your first post — sorry to repeat if so):
“…the choice of some individuals to refuse vaccination is likely to
affect the health and safety of vaccinated people in a manner dis-
proportionate to the fraction of unvaccinated people in the
population. Risk among unvaccinated people cannot be con-
sidered self-regarding, and considerations around equity and
justice for people who do choose to be vaccinated, as well as
those who choose not to be, need to be considered in the formu-
lation of vaccination policy. ”
They basically as you point out use ideal numbers to reach conclusions not at all reachable now (i.e. NEGATIVE efficacy now not 80% — the infecting likely goes vaxxed to vaxxed at this point, or vaxxed to unvaxxed were it not for robust natural immunity). They are very wrong about the use of their words “choose” here, vaccinations were/are forced through intimidation and loss of civil rights. They assert this work justifies eliminating bodily autonomy. This paper was written conclusion first.
Hi Andreas. Great stuff!
So what is the shot rule for Canada now? Is it still just two and done, then you can fly and rejoin society like a good soldier? If that is case, you could have received the two shots more than a year ago and be completely depleted of shot antibodies by now. Which makes you medically in the same situation as being the dreaded unshotted.
Why don't the powers that be require 4 shots to be able to rejoin society? When will stupid workplaces drop their shot mandates or require 4 shots for employees? Either do it full-force, and follow the medical science or don't do it at all. Two shots is completely, utterly worthless (and so is 2,3,4,5,6, ad inifity), but is still used as a compliance tool and nobody seems to care.
Ignoring reality has kept it away for two years. For some people. Take Joe Biden.
Please.
Thank you for laying this out so well for us. The insanity of the Canadian “study” is just too much. Talk about tortured assumptions to reach a forgone conclusion. Holy spit. No immunity for unjabbed!!? Wow. 80% jab efficacy (pipedream and they know it). Unreal.
The German article ist ausgezeichnet!! I laughed out loud several times and good practice, vielen dank!!
Remember IG Farben? BigPharma today seeks similar power and control.
IG Farben meme I made:
https://nosearch.org/images/memes/8b.jpg