15 Comments
User's avatar
smokegetsinyoureyes's avatar

Gee, it almost seems like both Germany and Canada have financial ties with the companies that make the vaccine technology! 🤣

Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

Don't say! No way!

Expand full comment
Dr. Flurm Googlybean's avatar

Yes the minor perturbation in vulnerable even if you force vaccinate the rest is a very good point. I think it important to repeat the wording of their conclusion (forgot if you did in your first post — sorry to repeat if so):

“…the choice of some individuals to refuse vaccination is likely to

affect the health and safety of vaccinated people in a manner dis-

proportionate to the fraction of unvaccinated people in the

population. Risk among unvaccinated people cannot be con-

sidered self-regarding, and considerations around equity and

justice for people who do choose to be vaccinated, as well as

those who choose not to be, need to be considered in the formu-

lation of vaccination policy. ”

They basically as you point out use ideal numbers to reach conclusions not at all reachable now (i.e. NEGATIVE efficacy now not 80% — the infecting likely goes vaxxed to vaxxed at this point, or vaxxed to unvaxxed were it not for robust natural immunity). They are very wrong about the use of their words “choose” here, vaccinations were/are forced through intimidation and loss of civil rights. They assert this work justifies eliminating bodily autonomy. This paper was written conclusion first.

Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

The whole diatribe is beyond ridiculous. Do they hear themselves? The vaccinated fear the unvaccinated? So what was the point of the whole jabbing exercise then? Rhetorical, of course.

Expand full comment
Dr. Flurm Googlybean's avatar

Really looks like the exercise is mostly to provide a scapegoat for the repeating waves of breakthrough infections.

Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

and they did it with a swagger.

Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

Great point about "chose". Although, there IS such a category, and it's vast in Canada. But out of 90% jabbed, probably 1/3 wouldn't if not forced one way or another. Previously, my guess would have been 2/3, but getting to see so many lemmings wearing masks out of their own volition, I have had to adjust my regard toward the "community".

Expand full comment
Dr. Byram W. Bridle's avatar

Hi Andreas. Great stuff!

Expand full comment
GAU8A's avatar

Ignoring reality has kept it away for two years. For some people. Take Joe Biden.

Please.

Expand full comment
Brian @ NoSearch.org's avatar

Remember IG Farben? BigPharma today seeks similar power and control.

IG Farben meme I made:

https://nosearch.org/images/memes/8b.jpg

Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

Weren't they rebranded as BioNTech recently?

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Apr 27, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

For another powerful rebuttal, please read Dr. Byram Bridle's post: https://viralimmunologist.substack.com/p/fiction-disguised-as-science-to-promote

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Apr 26, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

I think having 2 shots a year ago is better than having 4 shots 3 weeks ago, for one's protection against the virus. Yes, so far 2 shots satisfy TPTB. I guess they will ramp it up come fall. If the whole house of cards won't collapse under its own weight by then. 50/50, as everything in life.

Expand full comment
HiggsBosonSlut's avatar

Don't worry, between the spate of cases of cancer coming out of remission for the poked, a manufactured famine and possibly a world war, world longevity rates will start to plunge. Let's keep a close eye on stats for the next 3-5 yrs, but I don't think it's going to be good.

Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

If we live to see that?

Expand full comment