What If S Spike-Targeting Jabs Never Worked, Like At All?

Reviewing the evidence and the lack thereof.

This post shapes up to be necessarily a long one, but divided into four parts: The Banal, The Scientific, The Leading Edge, and The Dark Side of the Moon. If you are short on time and/or attention span, feel free to jump ahead to the part that you have the stomach for.

The Banal

Welcome to the Covid World 2020 (or 2019, or 2018?) We have been presented with a bold SARS-CoV-2 vaccine statement containing fraud on many levels, akin to the Russian doll:

The only way to stop the deadly SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is to mass-vaccinate with the S spike targeting vaccines, mRNA technology-based the best among them, that will fight (pick one or more) [infectivity; infectiousness; reinfection; severe disease; hospitalization; ICU admission; death] for (pick one or more) [the recipient, the recipient’s close ones, the “vulnerable” in the “community”, the “community”, the recipient’s country, the world, humanity]

With hindsight 20/20 (no pun intended), which one of the contentious points in this compound statement do you think is the biggest lie?

What if I told you that the biggest lie is that the inoculation with the S spike-coding, be it adenovirus-, plant-(LOL!) or mRNA-based jab, will “stimulate your immune system to develop immunity to SARS-CoV-2”, be it short lived, waning, incomplete, requiring frequent "“boosters”, or otherwise? No wonder Moderna settled on the Spikevax name for its “vaccine”. How about the pure harm, no strings or benefits, however short lived, attached? Want to bet? Let the festivities begin by first reviewing this evidence:

1. As has been made exceedingly clear with every passing revelation about the Pfizer and Moderna vaccine trials, massive amounts of scientific fraud has been deployed to eke out any semblance of efficacy and to hide the massive amount of harm resulting from the “vaccine” administration. I will refer you to Mathew Crawford’s posts, “Pfizer Trial Fraud: The House of Cards Shakes“ (2022.05.25) and “Defining Away Vaccine Safety Signals 9: The DMED is Fake“ (2022.05.18) for starters. Then, as Dr. Paul Alexander points out in “mRNA data to the FDA and trials by Pfizer and Moderna were frauds?“: “What about Moderna? FDA had over a year and inspected just one – ONE – of the trial’s 99 sites. How can FDA feel confident in the Moderna data based on a 1% sample?“

2. The reports from highly- and early-vaccinated countries coming in about the multiple-jabbed faring worse in all respects, including mortality, than the unvaccinated:

   • “danish study shows no benefit to overall mortality from mRNA vaccines“ (El Gato, 2022.04.23)

   • “Excess mortality up 84% in millennials (ages 25-44) since 2021 vaccine rollout: former Blackrock executive“ (James Hill, MD, JD, 2022.03.12)

   • “mRNA vaccines by Pfizer & Moderna DO NOT reduce mortality in POOLED meta-analysis“ (Dr. Paul Alexander, 2022.04.30)

   • “US Mortality Pre- and Post- Vaccine” (Joel Smalley, 2022.05.14)

     

3. An then, there has been a slew of misinformation and outright lies from the CDC and FDA about every single aspect of what the mRNA “vaccines” actually do and how they achieve (or not) the sought-after result: “CDC - Why Critical Thinking Is Dangerous“ (Author, 2021.12.14)

4. And somehow, we discover that the virus itself has been made, most likely (like 1 in ten trillion that is has not been) by Moderna or with its blessing, based on the trail of patents and other documents dating back at least two decades: “Sars-Cov-2 was Lab Made Under Project DEFUSE“ (Igor Chodov, 2022.05.22)

If you reject these arguments and wonder instead when and where you can get the 3rd booster, a.k.a. the fifth, then you need not bother reading the rest of this post.

If, on the other hand, you say “Yeah-yeah, we know all that already, why bring it up again?”, read on, because I have been just setting up the scene.

The Scientific

From the above we know that the S spike has not been an accident, rather the culmination of decades of hard, tedious and ingenious work of really smart guys likes Ralph Baric. With one singular focus - to identify and perfect the most dangerous natural influenza virus there is and turn it bioweapon-grade. The SARS S spike has been perfected, spiked further with HIV inserts, reverse-translated into the optimized for stability and fidelity mRNA code to be LipidNanoParticle-wrapped and delivered into the deltoid muscle of billions of humans around the world, repeatedly.

To do what exactly? Why, for your own body to produce at least an order of magnitude more S spikes than a “natural” infection with the “natural” virus would ever produce and throughout the tissues of your body, not just nasal cavity or lungs. And, as it turns out, to be produced and to linger in the “vaccine” recipients for at least 4 months after a jab. We know the last bit for a fact from this study by Bansal et al. from Oct. 15, 2021, “Cutting Edge: Circulating Exosomes with COVID Spike Protein Are Induced by BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) Vaccination prior to Development of Antibodies: A Novel Mechanism for Immune Activation by mRNA Vaccines“

But the most important and somehow overlooked bit is right in the title of this article and what I was leading you to all this time: “A Novel Mechanism for Immune Activation by mRNA Vaccines”. Not “immunity”, just “immune activation” - an important distinction we are about to research. Bansal has discovered in this study, that “Results demonstrated induction of circulating exosomes expressing spike protein on day 14 after vaccination followed by Abs 14 d after the second dose:

Exosomes with spike protein, Abs to SARS-CoV-2 spike, and T cells secreting IFN-g and TNF-a increased following the booster dose. Transmission electron microscopy of exosomes also demonstrated spike protein Ags on their surface:

Exosomes with spike protein and Abs decreased in parallel after four months.“

This means that the famed high level of S spike antibodies in the serum of “vaccinees” for up to 5 months post jab is not an indicator of their high level of immunity to the virus. It is rather an indicator of the high level of the toxic, pathogenic substance circulating in their bodies. And thus, the higher level of these jab-induced antibodies, when compared with the antibody levels of the naturally-recovered unvaccinated, is nothing to boast about.

The Leading Edge

And now let us look closely at the exosome part. The exosomes are as of yet poorly understood. So poorly, in fact, that September 16, 2022 – September 17, 2022 will be the days of “The 1st Inaugural International Conference of Exosomal Research”, Miami, FL. Welcome to the future!

Not that we are totally ignorant. Here’s the crash course on the topic:

• Exosome (vesicle) (Wikipedia):”Exosomes are membrane-bound extracellular vesicles (EVs) that are produced in the endosomal compartment of most eukaryotic cells. The multivesicular body (MVB) is an endosome with intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) that bud inward into the endosomal lumen. If the MVB fuses with the cell surface (the plasma membrane), these ILVs are released as exosomes”

  

• How do MVB come into being is quite murky, but Exosome Biogenesis involves these steps: “The plasma membrane buds inward, forming a membrane-bound vacuole. This endosome goes through several changes as it matures from an early endosome to a late endosome. Most notably, the endosomal membrane buds inward and pinches off to make membrane-bound vesicles inside the endosome and the endosome is now titled a multivesicular endosome (MVE). The MVE may travel to the lysosome and degrade its contents or it may travel to and fuse with the plasma membrane, releasing its contents, which, once existing outside the cell, are called exosomes“

  

• “In addition to exosomal packaging, each step of exosome biogenesis—trafficking to the plasma membrane, docking, fusion, and release—appears to be highly organized and regulated and, therefore, is potentially altered in cancer. Notably, exosome release tends to be exacerbated in tumor cells as compared to other proliferating cell types.“ Did they say “cancer”?!

From the scientific literature we know that Bansal et al. wasn’t really the first one to discover that S-spike-loaded exosomes are stimulating the production of the corresponding S spike antibodies (Abs). Same has been observed in 2007 in the case of none other than the SARS-CoV-2 progenitor, the good ol’ SARS itself, “Exosomal vaccines containing the S protein of the SARS coronavirus induce high levels of neutralizing antibodies“ (Virology, 2007.01.26): “The immunogenicity and efficacy of the S-containing exosomes were tested in mice and compared to an adenoviral vector vaccine expressing the S protein. Both, S-containing exosomes and the adenoviral vector vaccine induced neutralizing antibody titers. After priming with the SARS-S exosomal vaccine and boosting with the adenoviral vector the neutralizing antibody titers exceeded those observed in the convalescent serum of a SARS patient.“ Isn’t that a surprise! Sounds exactly like the health authorities preaching Covid jabs to the masses in 2021, doesn’t it?

The Dark Side of the Moon

So what went terribly wrong and why do Covid jabs not deliver on the “neutralizing antibody” or “immunity” front?

Imagine your poor cell transfected with the S spike mRNA, its immune mechanisms suppressed by the smuggled-in pseudouridinated mRNA code, the cell machinery hijacked to churn out inordinate quantities of the S spike. Of course it will try to purge these foreign proteins, and it seems like there is no faster way to achieve that end than via the exosome pathway. Throw them out the window, so to say, for them to become someone else’s problem. Problem solved!

But having so many S spike-loaded exosomes flooding your serum and everything else around is beset with its own problems. For one, we know that overabundance of antigen-loaded exosomes seems to be the preferred mechanism of chemotherapy evasion by some cancer cells, e.g. “Exosomal evasion of humoral immunotherapy in aggressive B-cell lymphoma modulated by ATP-binding cassette transporter A3” (2011.08.25): “Consequently, we have analyzed here exosome release from B-cell lymphomas and found strong exosome production and release from aggressive B-cell lymphoma cells in vitro and in vivo. Such exosomes carried the CD20 target antigen and acted as decoy targets upon rituximab exposure, allowing lymphoma cells to escape from humoral immunotherapy.“

Decoy targets! So, the mRNA-transfected cells are turned into the cancer cells of sorts. And while our body’s defenses are kept busy, or maybe overwhelmed, tracking down and eliminating each and every decoy target, the SARS-CoV-2 virus is left to its own devices inside the virus-infected cells, quietly procreating and mutating, picking up a key to the lock of our collective immunity. And it does so as the S spike antibodies tend to come in the non-neutralizing form when developed in response to the encounter with the “stabilized in the open configuration” mRNA-generated S spike.

“So, how come the vaccinated do not suffer the severe course of the disease or death, and the unvaccinated get severely sick and die at least ten times more often?”, I hear you ask. Well, do they?

Please contribute in the comments below, and we’ll pick up from there in the follow-up post:

SARS-CoV-2 S Spike To Centre Stage