the magical, pretzel logic that my jabbed loved ones use..... they think (with regard to toxicity of medicines and vaccines): it's just a "tiny" little pill or "tiny" bit of injection fluid.... how harmful can that be?
yet at the same time, they think great benefit from such miniscule amounts of whatever poison.
Great benefit with tiny or no harm. This is the mindset that says, "everything in moderation."
What? Even poisons in moderation? Really?
Yet, either there is something powerful in those pills and injections, which works on the body (else why take it?) or not. I say there IS something powerful in miniscule amounts of things, so we had better be sure it is powerful "good" rather than bad. We had better be fully informed.
I used to think these mad scientists simply didn't "know" the harms or dismissed them as being tiny or inconsequential. Now, though, I believe that some of the mad scientists know full well the harms, and that is why they are pushing this poison.
Of course they know. They had separate trials for the Nazi scientists because their crimes were so ABHORRENT. The Mad Scientist is a real thing, there is NO morality with these psychopaths.
Compare the two groups regarding other conditions on that table: atrial fibrillation, COPD, diabetes and hypertension. The "never received" fare better there, too.
This is the time for us to step up and stop it. The mindset that others can fix it is really what got us in this mess in the first place. The challenge I, and likely most of us have, is to figure out what we can do as individuals working on our own strengths in co-ordination of others doing the same. I lived a lifetime of grumbling about what I saw as 'wrong' with the 'system' and yet flowed with it because it was easier than risking everything.
Our world is now asking us to have the courage to risk everything and that is terrifying. And it means we are to change or die. And that is terrifying. Until we look into the terror that stops us we will not see the light of our spirit come alive to give us the power and strength to reach the other side. An amazingly spiritual time.
Looking at the chart for the other mentioned problems, all with exception of heart attacks in men, are practically halved being unjabbed. As Dr Michael Yeadon says, any injection into the arm and blood stream is totally useless in preventing any respiratory illness. My bet is that these flu jabs may contain some additives too!
So sorry for losing your mother from these jabs. I knew nothing until 2 years ago, trusted docs, did what was expected for my children and for any "exotic" holiday. Now I know the whole concept of contagion is a very profitable business model, benefits to shareholders only. I took the flu jab offered to me in Dec 2019. I had just reached pension age. Mid Jan 2020, I got really ill, flu like symptoms, diarrhoea, fever, horrible cough, etc. (all SARS Cov2 symptoms) before it was announced. I didn't relate this illness to the pandemic when it was annouced. I cured it with a bottle of whiskey, pure honey and lemon. I was fatigued for months after also. I've since learned that a lot of elderly in care homes died soon after but deaths attributed to so called Covid. I have declined any since knowing what I know but my stupid, but far more highly university educated adult children totally ignored all factual studies on mRNA gene therapy trials previously undertaken. I may not have a degree but I actually worked as admin in a trials research centre so was familiar with protocols and any adverse reactions that had to be reported within short time frames. From what I am reading and from videos watched, the contracts signed by governments seem to say that all adverse events be forwarded to "contractor" which in reality is not named manufacturers but USA Dept. of Defence and these vials are classed as "prototypes" also "countermeasures" so completely exempt from legit trials and good manufacturing practice also!
Just hot water with whiskey, honey and lemon. After not feeling ill anymore but still having dry cough, I was recommended Wormwood tea to drink. Ordered it online. Couple of teaspoons in full teapot taken with honey as it quite bitter tasting, maybe 6 small cups each day and relief felt immediately and cough was gone completely within 36 hours. Told to drink one to two cups per week to maintain health. I haven't done this but now colder weather I will get into routine. The whiskey drink is called a hot toddy!
Thank you for this compelling analysis! I used to view of the flu shot as useless but benign so I would take it. After seeing Big Pharma’s shenanigans with Covid vax efficacy data, I am never getting another shot or taking any medication again without a through analysis of the risk-reward trade-off. Thanks for sharing this as most people say “well you should at least get the flu shot” as some reasonable middle ground. No longer!
Hello Andreas, thank you. Actually I've been taking Vitamin D3 with K2 every day for 9 years - 10,000 IU per day. Also taking Vitamins A, B Complex, C, Quercetin, Zinc, Turmeric and Probiotics. Also know of four different homeopathic remedies for specific flu symptoms and have them all on hand. No worries about the Flu. As for the Elephant, been there - done that... now naturally immune.
Sorry, this isn't really a valid criticism. This is a textbook example of Simpson's paradox.
Regression models are very easily manipulated and should be heavily discounted on that basis alone, BUT the fact that the sign flips when you add controls doesn't invalidate the results, at least not on it's own.
Sure it is. A rate is no different from any other variable.
Imagine a study of people in working or living in a nursing home that's 90% residents and 10% staff. Analyze the death rate of those who watch 60 Minutes versus those who don't.
The crude death *rate* is much higher among the 60 Minutes watchers but when you control for age it reverses. Now you could criticize the study for other reasons, but not based on the fact that controlling for age reverses the sign.
It's complex and highly technical. My grad school had a 5,000 page econometrics handbook.
That said, you can play around in Excel with the Analysis Toolpak and build regression models to get a feel for how it works. It's pretty interesting. If you're mathematically inclined, read up on linear regression and then play around with a data set.
Except, they felt compelled to control for urban vs rural and affluent vs the rest, and sex, and each of the select comorbidities. They also say that age didn't affect nothing much... You keep picking until you strike gold. And yet, they keep mum about exactly they adjusted for other health conditions.
As you said, easily manipulated. And on this basis to declare a massive reduction in strokes is ludicrous. Or isn't it?
I'd agree that it seems like a pretty weak finding. Whenever you're looking for a small signal with so many variables, it's almost impossible to adequately control.
Basically, their findings/graphs show that the more comorbidities one has, the more one benefits from the avoidance of the flu in the short run and compared to the unvaccinated, provided you also have hypertension. If no hypertension, getting a flu jab makes your stroke chances go up. Also, the longer you take the flu jab, the more "beneficial" is the temporary (artifact) jab effect. Both phenomena indicate that the more one is susceptible to stroke, the more important is for one to avoid flu. But as the jabbed still die at much higher numbers over the course of the whole year, postponing the inevitable with the flu jabs is actually harmful and increases one's overall chances of stroke the more jabs one gets, acting as an extra comorbidity.
Bill G Gutted the Cochrane about ? 5 years ago ? and, of course, soon after, the top dedicated man was sideswiped for some audacious suggestions that the HPV data ( or research methodology.,?) appeared irregular. ….After that, ‘who’ would care what Cochrane says …
Thank you for the article - a necessary one I think. I pulled it up because I was stopped by the words "Your Flu Vaccine" implying of course that this intervention is an obviously necessary part of life. After all, we have no immune systems and nobody ever survives having the flu - silly me, I'm 71 and survived having the flu again and again - although after coming under homeopathic care thirty years ago, I have not had the flu ever again. No shots. No flu.
It’s funny how that works! I haven’t had any vaccines or a flu shot at 59. I haven’t been sick in YEARS! And I’m sure you have a STRONG immune system💪.
the magical, pretzel logic that my jabbed loved ones use..... they think (with regard to toxicity of medicines and vaccines): it's just a "tiny" little pill or "tiny" bit of injection fluid.... how harmful can that be?
yet at the same time, they think great benefit from such miniscule amounts of whatever poison.
Great benefit with tiny or no harm. This is the mindset that says, "everything in moderation."
What? Even poisons in moderation? Really?
Yet, either there is something powerful in those pills and injections, which works on the body (else why take it?) or not. I say there IS something powerful in miniscule amounts of things, so we had better be sure it is powerful "good" rather than bad. We had better be fully informed.
I used to think these mad scientists simply didn't "know" the harms or dismissed them as being tiny or inconsequential. Now, though, I believe that some of the mad scientists know full well the harms, and that is why they are pushing this poison.
Or they can't do anything else with their skill set, and prostitute themselves to anyone willing to pay.
Of course they know. They had separate trials for the Nazi scientists because their crimes were so ABHORRENT. The Mad Scientist is a real thing, there is NO morality with these psychopaths.
Compare the two groups regarding other conditions on that table: atrial fibrillation, COPD, diabetes and hypertension. The "never received" fare better there, too.
Make it stop. Someone? Please?
They moved on from unbelievable to absurd, to grotesque, at the speed of $cience!
Have you seen this funny video of Dr Honk Honk and the speed of science? 😅
https://www.bitchute.com/video/OYAAHMP7mtu4/
lovely!
$cience, ir something very smelly rolling downhill
Hello, Jaye:
This is the time for us to step up and stop it. The mindset that others can fix it is really what got us in this mess in the first place. The challenge I, and likely most of us have, is to figure out what we can do as individuals working on our own strengths in co-ordination of others doing the same. I lived a lifetime of grumbling about what I saw as 'wrong' with the 'system' and yet flowed with it because it was easier than risking everything.
Our world is now asking us to have the courage to risk everything and that is terrifying. And it means we are to change or die. And that is terrifying. Until we look into the terror that stops us we will not see the light of our spirit come alive to give us the power and strength to reach the other side. An amazingly spiritual time.
Looking at the chart for the other mentioned problems, all with exception of heart attacks in men, are practically halved being unjabbed. As Dr Michael Yeadon says, any injection into the arm and blood stream is totally useless in preventing any respiratory illness. My bet is that these flu jabs may contain some additives too!
So sorry for losing your mother from these jabs. I knew nothing until 2 years ago, trusted docs, did what was expected for my children and for any "exotic" holiday. Now I know the whole concept of contagion is a very profitable business model, benefits to shareholders only. I took the flu jab offered to me in Dec 2019. I had just reached pension age. Mid Jan 2020, I got really ill, flu like symptoms, diarrhoea, fever, horrible cough, etc. (all SARS Cov2 symptoms) before it was announced. I didn't relate this illness to the pandemic when it was annouced. I cured it with a bottle of whiskey, pure honey and lemon. I was fatigued for months after also. I've since learned that a lot of elderly in care homes died soon after but deaths attributed to so called Covid. I have declined any since knowing what I know but my stupid, but far more highly university educated adult children totally ignored all factual studies on mRNA gene therapy trials previously undertaken. I may not have a degree but I actually worked as admin in a trials research centre so was familiar with protocols and any adverse reactions that had to be reported within short time frames. From what I am reading and from videos watched, the contracts signed by governments seem to say that all adverse events be forwarded to "contractor" which in reality is not named manufacturers but USA Dept. of Defence and these vials are classed as "prototypes" also "countermeasures" so completely exempt from legit trials and good manufacturing practice also!
That whiskey-based remedy has spiked my interest! Can expound on that, please?
Just hot water with whiskey, honey and lemon. After not feeling ill anymore but still having dry cough, I was recommended Wormwood tea to drink. Ordered it online. Couple of teaspoons in full teapot taken with honey as it quite bitter tasting, maybe 6 small cups each day and relief felt immediately and cough was gone completely within 36 hours. Told to drink one to two cups per week to maintain health. I haven't done this but now colder weather I will get into routine. The whiskey drink is called a hot toddy!
My MIL died 6-8 weeks after her flu shot in 2020. Of a massive stroke
I had a dream that I was being injected last night, but then decided that was a bad idea. Even while I was dreaming....
Of course those whove actually been vexzed, like my acquaintance said, can't take that stuff out now.
I used to call that guy my friend, ....
He had told me, why didn't I just go get injected, expletive....?
Even the bad dream of injection impressed me as an immediate mistake.
We must feel all the sympathy that we can muster for those who've been coerced, which must be most of San Francisco killafornia and the surrounds.
The rich folks ' playground....
Unlike my bad dream, they don't get a chance to affirm their decision to be unjabbed thereafter.
I am truly blessed by the good Lord Goddess great Spirit for the gift of a brain to think for myself and a heart to love.
And for my cat who climbs into bed when I have to get to work, to wake my ass up and take the bed over....
🙀💉nightmare 💉🙀
Thank you for this compelling analysis! I used to view of the flu shot as useless but benign so I would take it. After seeing Big Pharma’s shenanigans with Covid vax efficacy data, I am never getting another shot or taking any medication again without a through analysis of the risk-reward trade-off. Thanks for sharing this as most people say “well you should at least get the flu shot” as some reasonable middle ground. No longer!
Yeah, that is where they will get them!
Or shingles...
Hello Andreas, thank you. Actually I've been taking Vitamin D3 with K2 every day for 9 years - 10,000 IU per day. Also taking Vitamins A, B Complex, C, Quercetin, Zinc, Turmeric and Probiotics. Also know of four different homeopathic remedies for specific flu symptoms and have them all on hand. No worries about the Flu. As for the Elephant, been there - done that... now naturally immune.
Another win for Net Zero Carbon
Omg, anyone looking at that first table should run away from any injections!!!! Lord.
Thank you Andreas. Great break down of the total effort to get everyone injected.
What is in those vials? Fascinating stuff.
Much better than even the most clever spy-vs-spy make believe.
Grab the popcorn, as El Gato has his cats do, as we watch what wacky and deadly story twist
will come next.
Just another day in the upside down world...
Pharmaceutical companies getting rich.
While we go into the sunset - win-win?
Sorry, this isn't really a valid criticism. This is a textbook example of Simpson's paradox.
Regression models are very easily manipulated and should be heavily discounted on that basis alone, BUT the fact that the sign flips when you add controls doesn't invalidate the results, at least not on it's own.
It's not a Simpson's paradox when you're comparing the RATE of two different groups.
Sure it is. A rate is no different from any other variable.
Imagine a study of people in working or living in a nursing home that's 90% residents and 10% staff. Analyze the death rate of those who watch 60 Minutes versus those who don't.
The crude death *rate* is much higher among the 60 Minutes watchers but when you control for age it reverses. Now you could criticize the study for other reasons, but not based on the fact that controlling for age reverses the sign.
You should work for UCalgary, Steve!
Now, I looked in the Appendix (https://www.thelancet.com/cms/10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00222-5/attachment/8e87d207-f060-425a-ba2c-21e63ce98f65/mmc1.pdf) and couldn't see HOW they did the adjustments to come up with the end result so dramatically different from the "crude observation". Can you have a look and comment? I have added a bit to the post in regard to their "adjustments".
It's complex and highly technical. My grad school had a 5,000 page econometrics handbook.
That said, you can play around in Excel with the Analysis Toolpak and build regression models to get a feel for how it works. It's pretty interesting. If you're mathematically inclined, read up on linear regression and then play around with a data set.
Except, they felt compelled to control for urban vs rural and affluent vs the rest, and sex, and each of the select comorbidities. They also say that age didn't affect nothing much... You keep picking until you strike gold. And yet, they keep mum about exactly they adjusted for other health conditions.
As you said, easily manipulated. And on this basis to declare a massive reduction in strokes is ludicrous. Or isn't it?
I'd agree that it seems like a pretty weak finding. Whenever you're looking for a small signal with so many variables, it's almost impossible to adequately control.
That's why RCT's are so important.
Thanks to you , I have been thinking about it some more and came up with the follow-up post, https://live2fightanotherday.substack.com/p/stroke-vs-flu-jab-study-wrap-up
Basically, their findings/graphs show that the more comorbidities one has, the more one benefits from the avoidance of the flu in the short run and compared to the unvaccinated, provided you also have hypertension. If no hypertension, getting a flu jab makes your stroke chances go up. Also, the longer you take the flu jab, the more "beneficial" is the temporary (artifact) jab effect. Both phenomena indicate that the more one is susceptible to stroke, the more important is for one to avoid flu. But as the jabbed still die at much higher numbers over the course of the whole year, postponing the inevitable with the flu jabs is actually harmful and increases one's overall chances of stroke the more jabs one gets, acting as an extra comorbidity.
Remember when the Cochrane Study used to actually do good work?
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20166072/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16856068/
Bill G Gutted the Cochrane about ? 5 years ago ? and, of course, soon after, the top dedicated man was sideswiped for some audacious suggestions that the HPV data ( or research methodology.,?) appeared irregular. ….After that, ‘who’ would care what Cochrane says …
exactly. they used to be, well, useful. not so much now.
Thank you for the article - a necessary one I think. I pulled it up because I was stopped by the words "Your Flu Vaccine" implying of course that this intervention is an obviously necessary part of life. After all, we have no immune systems and nobody ever survives having the flu - silly me, I'm 71 and survived having the flu again and again - although after coming under homeopathic care thirty years ago, I have not had the flu ever again. No shots. No flu.
It’s funny how that works! I haven’t had any vaccines or a flu shot at 59. I haven’t been sick in YEARS! And I’m sure you have a STRONG immune system💪.
Well, if you die of some other immune reaction related thing, it won't be stroke you're dying from, eh?