I can read both. The point made was that about 2.5% of Covid-19 deaths were indisputably such, the rest had multiple, up to 5, serious comorbidities and were dubious Covid-19 deaths at best. And based on these faulty data, the public policy was engineered and established, and maintained to this day.
I can read both. The point made was that about 2.5% of Covid-19 deaths were indisputably such, the rest had multiple, up to 5, serious comorbidities and were dubious Covid-19 deaths at best. And based on these faulty data, the public policy was engineered and established, and maintained to this day.
I can read both. The point made was that about 2.5% of Covid-19 deaths were indisputably such, the rest had multiple, up to 5, serious comorbidities and were dubious Covid-19 deaths at best. And based on these faulty data, the public policy was engineered and established, and maintained to this day.