Okay, so you clearly know more than I do. The original article talked about reverse transcription of VIRUS RNA into nucleic DNA, right?
Are you saying the same happens with the vaccine RNA? And you are saying that GQDs help to transport vaccine mRNA into the nucleus? Does it need reverse transcriptase to effect reverse transcription, like in HIV?
It's not the "virus RNA", it's "fragments of the virus RNA". So, the whole virus is not integrating in the genome, but some fragments thereof. Jaeneisch at al. speculate that the S spike code does, hence the long Covid symptoms in so many convalescents. That tells us, empirically, that the RNA code from SARS-CoV-2 is embeddable into the human DNA, and then translatable from there into the S spikes. If that GQDs help the vaxx mRNA to embed into the human DNA, then thus genetically modified cells, when they divide, have a potential to produce the S spike, or other garbage from the vaxx (being a soup of many modRNAs, Spike mRNA constituting only 60-70% thereof). And they don't necessarily do it right away so they get zapped by the immune system, the S spike may be expressed much later, when this new gene expression is triggered by some signalling molecules, for example, or other factors of gene expression. In the meantime, the affected tissues would accumulate more and more cells containing this gene, like the ticking time bombs waiting to go off. The epithelial cells, having high turnover rates, are prime candidates.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4749692/: "Long Interspersed Nuclear Element 1 (LINE-1) retrotransposons represent a large family of repeated genomic elements. They transpose using a reverse transcriptase (RT), which they encode as part of the ORF2p product."
https://elifesciences.org/articles/30058: "LINE-1 enters the nucleus as the cell starts to divide and the membrane of the nucleus breaks down. The LINE-1 complexes are then retained in the nucleus while the membrane of the nucleus reforms. Later, as the cell duplicates its genetic material, LINE-1 starts to copy and paste itself. Mita et al., together with another group of researchers, also found that during this process, only LINE-1 RNA and ORF2p were found in the nucleus."
As GQDs may help to transport mRNA into the nucleus, the cells with the LINE-1 in the nucleus are susceptible to this mRNA incorporation into the cells genes (https://www.pnas.org/content/118/21/e2105968118).
As we are talking about billions upon billions of LPN-delivered mRNAs, this is a huge Russian roulette that may fire quite a few times. Long Covid is one suspect, but GQDs -spiked vaccine would be much more viable, wouldn't it?
It's not a rigorous proof, but a hypothesis on some legs.
Thanks. I also asked a question on your another article: do you have good links on the history of mRNA treatments that were universally failures? I need that to talk to my doubtful friends.
Mar 7, 2022·edited Mar 7, 2022Liked by Andreas Oehler
Andreas, your cen.acs link, being based on a 2018 presentation to prospective Moderna investors, is very easy layperson reading.
Here's a couple of extracts to encourage your readers to click on it:
"Several biotech companies use lipid nanoparticles to shuttle mRNA into cells.
Moderna President Stephen Hoge 'In our language, mRNA is the software of life.”
Cells use mRNA to translate the static genes of DNA into dynamic proteins, involved in every bodily function, Hoge explained. Biotech companies make some of these proteins as drugs in large vats of genetically engineered cells. It’s a time-consuming and costly process.
Moderna offered a different proposition: What if instead, mRNA was given therapeutically? In theory, it could prompt proteins to be made in your body. It would put the drug factory inside you.
In their academic labs, Rossi and Chien injected mRNA encoding a protein called vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) directly into the hearts of mice. Scientists had long surmised that VEGF could heal heart tissue damaged during a heart attack, but VEGF proteins don’t stick around long enough, so simply injecting the proteins doesn’t work. The VEGF-encoding mRNA, however, lingered in cells, making enough of the protein to improve the animals’ survival and health after a heart attack (Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2682)."
So Moderna have VGDF encoding mRNA all ready to inject you with to fix all the heart and blood vessel problems that you have from their Covid clotshots.
Also found this: https://cen.acs.org/business/start-ups/mRNA-disrupt-drug-industry/96/i35: "An even bigger long-term challenge will be getting mRNA into specific cells of the body. Lipid nanoparticles have a tendency to aggregate in the liver. That could make mRNA useful for producing therapeutic proteins and antibodies that are secreted from liver cells and circulated in the bloodstream. But getting mRNA therapies into other organs will require either direct injection into that tissue—as in AstraZeneca’s post-heart attack VEGF study—or fancy new control systems." Of course, that was written before the Covid vaxx censorship and $cientific consensus. Now they would be burnt on the stake for spreading "vaccine" hesitancy.
Okay, so you clearly know more than I do. The original article talked about reverse transcription of VIRUS RNA into nucleic DNA, right?
Are you saying the same happens with the vaccine RNA? And you are saying that GQDs help to transport vaccine mRNA into the nucleus? Does it need reverse transcriptase to effect reverse transcription, like in HIV?
It's not the "virus RNA", it's "fragments of the virus RNA". So, the whole virus is not integrating in the genome, but some fragments thereof. Jaeneisch at al. speculate that the S spike code does, hence the long Covid symptoms in so many convalescents. That tells us, empirically, that the RNA code from SARS-CoV-2 is embeddable into the human DNA, and then translatable from there into the S spikes. If that GQDs help the vaxx mRNA to embed into the human DNA, then thus genetically modified cells, when they divide, have a potential to produce the S spike, or other garbage from the vaxx (being a soup of many modRNAs, Spike mRNA constituting only 60-70% thereof). And they don't necessarily do it right away so they get zapped by the immune system, the S spike may be expressed much later, when this new gene expression is triggered by some signalling molecules, for example, or other factors of gene expression. In the meantime, the affected tissues would accumulate more and more cells containing this gene, like the ticking time bombs waiting to go off. The epithelial cells, having high turnover rates, are prime candidates.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4749692/: "Long Interspersed Nuclear Element 1 (LINE-1) retrotransposons represent a large family of repeated genomic elements. They transpose using a reverse transcriptase (RT), which they encode as part of the ORF2p product."
https://elifesciences.org/articles/30058: "LINE-1 enters the nucleus as the cell starts to divide and the membrane of the nucleus breaks down. The LINE-1 complexes are then retained in the nucleus while the membrane of the nucleus reforms. Later, as the cell duplicates its genetic material, LINE-1 starts to copy and paste itself. Mita et al., together with another group of researchers, also found that during this process, only LINE-1 RNA and ORF2p were found in the nucleus."
As GQDs may help to transport mRNA into the nucleus, the cells with the LINE-1 in the nucleus are susceptible to this mRNA incorporation into the cells genes (https://www.pnas.org/content/118/21/e2105968118).
As we are talking about billions upon billions of LPN-delivered mRNAs, this is a huge Russian roulette that may fire quite a few times. Long Covid is one suspect, but GQDs -spiked vaccine would be much more viable, wouldn't it?
It's not a rigorous proof, but a hypothesis on some legs.
Thanks for the questioning, Igor! I have incorporated my answers into the article now.
Thanks. I also asked a question on your another article: do you have good links on the history of mRNA treatments that were universally failures? I need that to talk to my doubtful friends.
https://www.statnews.com/2017/01/10/moderna-trouble-mrna/
https://www.labiotech.eu/trends-news/curevac-mrna-jpmorgan-failure/
Also look at that (!), a review from Sep. 2018 - all the pieces of the "mRNA vaccine" puzzle were already in place back in 2018, with same "nice" actors: https://cen.acs.org/business/start-ups/mRNA-disrupt-drug-industry/96/i35
Andreas, your cen.acs link, being based on a 2018 presentation to prospective Moderna investors, is very easy layperson reading.
Here's a couple of extracts to encourage your readers to click on it:
"Several biotech companies use lipid nanoparticles to shuttle mRNA into cells.
Moderna President Stephen Hoge 'In our language, mRNA is the software of life.”
Cells use mRNA to translate the static genes of DNA into dynamic proteins, involved in every bodily function, Hoge explained. Biotech companies make some of these proteins as drugs in large vats of genetically engineered cells. It’s a time-consuming and costly process.
Moderna offered a different proposition: What if instead, mRNA was given therapeutically? In theory, it could prompt proteins to be made in your body. It would put the drug factory inside you.
In their academic labs, Rossi and Chien injected mRNA encoding a protein called vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) directly into the hearts of mice. Scientists had long surmised that VEGF could heal heart tissue damaged during a heart attack, but VEGF proteins don’t stick around long enough, so simply injecting the proteins doesn’t work. The VEGF-encoding mRNA, however, lingered in cells, making enough of the protein to improve the animals’ survival and health after a heart attack (Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2682)."
So Moderna have VGDF encoding mRNA all ready to inject you with to fix all the heart and blood vessel problems that you have from their Covid clotshots.
How very nice of them!
thank you, just what I needed, I saved these links and read them also
Also found this: https://cen.acs.org/business/start-ups/mRNA-disrupt-drug-industry/96/i35: "An even bigger long-term challenge will be getting mRNA into specific cells of the body. Lipid nanoparticles have a tendency to aggregate in the liver. That could make mRNA useful for producing therapeutic proteins and antibodies that are secreted from liver cells and circulated in the bloodstream. But getting mRNA therapies into other organs will require either direct injection into that tissue—as in AstraZeneca’s post-heart attack VEGF study—or fancy new control systems." Of course, that was written before the Covid vaxx censorship and $cientific consensus. Now they would be burnt on the stake for spreading "vaccine" hesitancy.
As the reader Keith Curtis wrote, Seneff and Nigh paper is the best one describing the unintended biological impacts of the mRNA vaccines on humanity: https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/23/51
Another detailed article on ADE and coronavirus vaccines: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41564-020-00789-5
Robert Malone would be the perfect person to reply to this question...
And Luigi Warren, whose mRNA work formed the basis of Moderna. He's on our side.