Continued from “Lasting Legacy of Trojan Horses“
How much more weird can it get? We keep performing, ad nauseam, a strange ritual of speculating about the mRNA “vaccine” mechanisms of action and the adverse events thereof without doing the most immediate and straightforward thing - actually analyzing the content of the vials.
How will we know “if they really love us” - what is in the vials - other than blindly trusting the assurances of FDA/CDC and the jab purveyors that wanted to keep their shenanigans out of the public view for the next 75 years? Like, they would never lie to us and put knowingly anything undisclosed and harmful in the vials, would they?
By looking ourselves. Why can’t the vials be secured for such an analysis? It’s not the enriched uranium or plutonium, or is it? I am not suggesting stealing them and killing grannies by denying them access to the life-saving jabs. It’s not January 2021 any longer and expired vials go to trash these days in staggering quantities. Based on the following article, many states are having to destroy expired "vaccines" because demand is down: “As Vaccine Demand Falls, States Are Left With Huge Stockpile”. If anybody knows a doctor or pharmacist who might be willing to help, this could be a way of procuring vials about to expire. Of course, they would have to be analyzed immediately... Tell us how much it costs, here’s the cash. Our public health authorities of the world should be falling over each other rushing to help us in such noble pursuit. Or am I mistaken?
What will we be looking for? How about starting with the tips from the Pfizer, Moderna whistleblowers and EMA hackers, that there may be:
graphene quantum dots, giving the Pfizer vials strange fluorescence in low light conditions (“GQDs as mRNA Delivery System into Cell Nuclei?“)
LINE-1 expression plasmids, increasing LINE-1 expression in cells exposed to the Pfizer BNT162b2 “vaccine” in vitro (“Implications of BNT162b2 in Human Cells Changing Gene Expression of LINE-1“)
mRNA coding for mutant versions of CYP19A1 and CDKN1B genes affecting female fertility, as reported by the anonymous Moderna whistleblowers (“Lasting Legacy of Trojan Horses”)
lots and lots of “truncated mRNA species“, as reported by EMA (to be reaching 45% of the total mRNA content of the vials) back in Nov. 2020 in their leaked correspondence with Pfizer (“Zeroing in on Gifts from “Science” to Humanity”)
DNA changes in the vaccinated as the result of all of the above
How will we look? For GQDs, with a simple spectral analysis and microscope. For LINE-1 expression plasmids and undisclosed mRNA, through the whole genome sequencing (WGS) techniques widely available in labs around the world, like https://www.pacb.com/products-and-services/applications/whole-genome-sequencing/ (“Only PacBio HiFi sequencing has the high accuracy, long reads, and unbiased coverage required to provide a truly comprehensive view“). DNA changes in the vaccinated - as proposed by Igor Chudov, via an analysis like advertised at https://kromatid.com (“Single-cell innovative solutions for the discovery detection and quantification of genomic structural variations for gene and cell therapy scientists“)
Who can help? Governments interested in the health and safety of their citizens. Sweden, Denmark, Florida immediately come to mind. Feel free to make your suggestions.
Who will do it? A panel of independent scientists from around the world, in a very open, public way, to prevent sudden deaths among them.
Is it too much to ask? If you don’t think so and can contact the likes of Joe Rogan, Stu Peters, Alex Jones, please do so to keep this topic hot until it results in something. A negative result is also a result - nothing to lose, all to gain.
P.S. 2022.08.01 It took a while, but here’s some sort of a result... “Want to know what's inside the vaccine vials?” (Steve Kirsch):
One of my colleagues did mass spectrometry on 4 mRNA vaccine vials: two from Moderna and two from Pfizer. He found PEG, but no phosphorus which means he found the lipid nanoparticles, but no payload or preservative. A bunch of blanks. No mRNA.
No, it's not too much to ask.
It would also appear that there may be some self-assembling nanotechnology in the shot, triggered by heat (approx 38-42C). The assemblages do not look like glass shards, paper fibers, or the other types of things you can often see on dirty slides and coverslips. It also doesn't feel like crystallization from evaporation, though who knows. I trust this particular story more than some of the fuzzy and poor quality stuff I've seen from other groups alleging "hydras" etc. because it comes from New Zealand.
https://archive.fo/2022.01.29-225016/https://masksaredangerous.com/nanotech-in-the-shots/
There are videos here: https://lifeoftheblood.com/
There are all sorts of potential explanations for this, but one could be "Spartacus'" description of potential graphene nanosheets and silicon nanowires:
https://iceni.substack.com/p/covid-19-a-web-of-corruption?s=r
Perhaps this has something to do with the "Internet of Bodies" the WEF crowd often talk about.
My personal hunch is that the vaccines are designed to do many multiple things:
-trigger antibodies to spike to provide plausible deniability
-sterilize the population
-weaken the immune system
-increase cancer rates to provide a fairly steep (but not catastrophic) decline in the population and reduce unfunded welfare state liabilities by taking out the old and weak
-construct preliminary experiments for "Internet of Bodies"
I suspect they did not expect this level of adverse reactions to occur and to be tipping people off. Much has been discussed about the fusogenic nature of spike protein but I also wonder about the size of these little nanochips (if that's what they are). Sharp things larger than 7-10 um could definitely cause immunological problems and blood clots. Some of the things visualized (the very small yellow rectangles) on the lifeoftheblood page appear smaller than 7 um.
Just some thoughts.
Chain of custody is very important. I don't think we should wait for a government to do the right thing, but somebody who can prove the authenticity of the vial needs to be the one supplying it.
Also, we really should have as big a sample as we can get. As many lot numbers as possible.