Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Monica Hughes PhD's avatar

No, it's not too much to ask.

It would also appear that there may be some self-assembling nanotechnology in the shot, triggered by heat (approx 38-42C). The assemblages do not look like glass shards, paper fibers, or the other types of things you can often see on dirty slides and coverslips. It also doesn't feel like crystallization from evaporation, though who knows. I trust this particular story more than some of the fuzzy and poor quality stuff I've seen from other groups alleging "hydras" etc. because it comes from New Zealand.

https://archive.fo/2022.01.29-225016/https://masksaredangerous.com/nanotech-in-the-shots/

There are videos here: https://lifeoftheblood.com/

There are all sorts of potential explanations for this, but one could be "Spartacus'" description of potential graphene nanosheets and silicon nanowires:

https://iceni.substack.com/p/covid-19-a-web-of-corruption?s=r

Perhaps this has something to do with the "Internet of Bodies" the WEF crowd often talk about.

My personal hunch is that the vaccines are designed to do many multiple things:

-trigger antibodies to spike to provide plausible deniability

-sterilize the population

-weaken the immune system

-increase cancer rates to provide a fairly steep (but not catastrophic) decline in the population and reduce unfunded welfare state liabilities by taking out the old and weak

-construct preliminary experiments for "Internet of Bodies"

I suspect they did not expect this level of adverse reactions to occur and to be tipping people off. Much has been discussed about the fusogenic nature of spike protein but I also wonder about the size of these little nanochips (if that's what they are). Sharp things larger than 7-10 um could definitely cause immunological problems and blood clots. Some of the things visualized (the very small yellow rectangles) on the lifeoftheblood page appear smaller than 7 um.

Just some thoughts.

Expand full comment
Shy Boy's avatar

Chain of custody is very important. I don't think we should wait for a government to do the right thing, but somebody who can prove the authenticity of the vial needs to be the one supplying it.

Also, we really should have as big a sample as we can get. As many lot numbers as possible.

Expand full comment
148 more comments...

No posts