My husband calls it "the jab face bloat" referring to how many people look bloated in the face after getting the shots.
is it safe to assume that somatic cell death could cause inflammation?
P.S. I'm sick thinking about how many people I care about have gotten these stupid shots. i already know two people who have dropped dead from the climate change.
An autoimmune reaction from the jab is an inflammatory response. So the bloated look makes sense to me. I have a friend who's hives started two months after her booster. At first I looked at it as an allergic reaction, and that would be too far out from her booster shot. But now I'm wondering if her body can't manage the inflammation and it's expressing as hives.
Everyone I love has gotten these shots. 🙏 It's been hard to come to terms with for sure.
Oh my gosh, I didn't know that. I thought it was like 6-8 weeks. My friend is Uber healthy, so having hives is very unusual for her. (I know, how can she be Uber healthy and take this goddamn vaccine!?).
Mine too, but I don't know if she'll go for it at this time. She got a prescription from Kaiser that took the hives away for now. Maybe if they're long-term or she develops other inflammatory problems she'll be open to it. It's hard for people to recognize they've injured themselves.
I appreciate your in-depth and relatively simple analysis of these things, which are far above my level of knowledge. It would appear to me that these evil forces have succeeded, at least for a generation or so, in accomplishing their goal of population reduction. 😒 I hope and pray that I'll live to see them dangle from a noose for their horrific crimes.
Interesting comment over on el gato malo's substack regarding the study. He asked a few of his geneticist friends about the study and he said this response was typical:
“They did not show integration in the genome... but they did show LINE-1 is expressed which has integrase activity.”
“I bet they are a few months away from showing genome integration. They need Deep PacBio Sequencing to do this as the integration events are likely to be different in each cell and hard to pin down in an ensemble collection of cells.”
“This should induce an immediate moratorium on mRNA transfections until WGS is complete on the Huh7 cell lines.”
This surprised me as I knew LINE-1 has reverse transcription ability (i.e. can convert mRNA to DNA) but I did not know it also had integrase activity. So if I understand this correctly, LINE-1 also has the capability to snip the genome and facilitate DNA insertion (it integrates it, hence its name).
This just gets worse and worse.
BTW, I found both Andreas' and Stephanie's substack via both of your comments over at Igor Chudov's page over the last few days. You guys are both doing good work, thanks for helping advance our knowledge.
I have noticed my subscriptions spike thanks to Igor.
Yes, L1 is a versatile thing, it can move around the genome, as you said 3-in-1, reverse transcribing, cutting, integrating.
These guys will keep denying until it’s banally obvious. Even the Swedes have been extremely circumspect in what they did and didn’t write, not to attract the wreath of the establishment. I have asked them some questions, no response - they seem to be not too happy with all the attention.
I bet. I've been reading vaccine-related studies for over ten years after a close family member suffered a very serious adverse reaction in childhood. There's a pattern that usually followed: State that vaccines are the greatest public health advancement in the history of mankind, describe what was observed in the most sterile terms, downplay the results, and finish up with excuses for why it probably doesn't mean anything.
It's okay to publish findings but they cannot be presented in a fashion that can be construed as even mildly critical. These guys didn't follow the script, probably out of naivete. Hopefully they aren't about to get clobbered.
Edit: Read up on what happened to Andy Wakefield as a preview to what these folks might have in store. Also grab a PDF of the study as it may be retracted.
Edit 2: BTW, Wakefield's Wikipedia page isn't remotely true and was written by the same "science based medicine" crowd that told us the mRNA vax is safe, effective, and should be mandated by law. Wakefield refused to retract and do penance so he was destroyed. Most researchers learned their lesson from this. Vaccines are hallowed ground and writing anything remotely critical sets one up for the Wakefield treatment.
So, what might that be? Wow! How about measuring how many jabs are still needed to achieve the desired goals? And which populations, genetically speaking, under-perform and need more of their attention? That would make sense to me. Considering that CDC doesn't move a finger to do anything useful in combating the pandemic, suddenly analyzing 10% of buccal swabs. So, in conclusion, they are not searching - they are measuring. IMHO.
Thank you, this is great! I really appreciate the mini lecture in the beginning outlining the terrain so it's easier to understand.
This is from the Wikipedia link that Andreas provided, I found it very helpful.
"Cellular senescence is a phenomenon characterized by the cessation of cell division. In their experiments during the early 1960s, Leonard Hayflick and Paul Moorhead found that normal human fetal fibroblasts in culture reach a maximum of approximately 50 cell population doublings before becoming senescent. This process is known as "replicative senescence", or the Hayflick limit. Hayflick's discovery of mortal cells paved the way for the discovery and understanding of cellular aging molecular pathways. Cellular senescence can be initiated by a wide variety of stress inducing factors. These stress factors include both environmental and internal damaging events, abnormal cellular growth, oxidative stress, autophagy factors, among many other things."
I'm going to have to read this a couple of times before I can comment more intelligently as it uses a lot of technical jargon I'm not up to speed on (yet - ha!). I'd appreciate your review of my video and article here - https://wholistic.substack.com/p/if-vaccine-mrna-alters-dna-what-does - if you have some time...I made it for laypeople to discuss the possibility of what might happen if mRNA from covid vaccines gets into cellular DNA.
However, I didn't touch the subject of other potential modifications per some of the rumors. But correct me if I'm wrong, even if the mRNA doesn't have added "stuff" in it, isn't it bad enough as it is, if it were to actually undergo reverse transcription and get into chromosomal DNA? Though...if the rest of this is true...then we're looking at a total nightmare. Thanks. PS Checking out your other article now too.
Thanks, very instructive article! This one is also an instructive one, for the most part.
The chromosome modifications are of little importance if happening in few somatic cells, Long Covid-like disease might be the worst outcome. Eventually the cells expressing S spike should be killed off, unless there is an immune deficiency - then severe AE should be expected. Germline cells with modified chromosomes will be way more portending, basically affecting every cell in the foetus - not likely it will develop/survive, in case of S spike code embedded and actually being expressed. But, this is hypothetical - no confirmed clinical cases to refer to at the moment.
This mRNA monkey business is pretty cool if someone has ulterior motives - go figure what has been really added to the jabs, unless whistleblowers get all the samples and formulas and find an investigative body willing to investigate. We can only do genetic tests on the jabbed, as Igor suggested, at normal level of expertise/equipment. By which time the vast majority of the world population would have been affected. What not to like?
OK, so if I am understanding you correctly, the likely outcome is something like long covid (basically an autoimmune-type disease) and infertility. What about cancer?
That will not be due to the DNA changes. But repeated jabbing with the spikes and mRNA, both lingering for 4-6 months with every jab will do it, and much more. Keep up to date on your jabs, they say.
Excellent article!
My husband calls it "the jab face bloat" referring to how many people look bloated in the face after getting the shots.
is it safe to assume that somatic cell death could cause inflammation?
P.S. I'm sick thinking about how many people I care about have gotten these stupid shots. i already know two people who have dropped dead from the climate change.
Praying some of them got "control" batches.
Yes, that is one of the reactions of senescent cells turning up inflammation and begging to be killed.
An autoimmune reaction from the jab is an inflammatory response. So the bloated look makes sense to me. I have a friend who's hives started two months after her booster. At first I looked at it as an allergic reaction, and that would be too far out from her booster shot. But now I'm wondering if her body can't manage the inflammation and it's expressing as hives.
Everyone I love has gotten these shots. 🙏 It's been hard to come to terms with for sure.
the mRNA keeps churning out spikes for 4-6 months, so 2 months out is nothing.
Oh my gosh, I didn't know that. I thought it was like 6-8 weeks. My friend is Uber healthy, so having hives is very unusual for her. (I know, how can she be Uber healthy and take this goddamn vaccine!?).
Load up on ivermectin would be my advise
Mine too, but I don't know if she'll go for it at this time. She got a prescription from Kaiser that took the hives away for now. Maybe if they're long-term or she develops other inflammatory problems she'll be open to it. It's hard for people to recognize they've injured themselves.
I appreciate your in-depth and relatively simple analysis of these things, which are far above my level of knowledge. It would appear to me that these evil forces have succeeded, at least for a generation or so, in accomplishing their goal of population reduction. 😒 I hope and pray that I'll live to see them dangle from a noose for their horrific crimes.
A reading of the Bible alludes to a judgment far more "sustainable"--and fossil-fuel emulating--than a simple noose. 🔥🔥🔥🔥
And lots of useful instructions on what not to do upon such eventuality.
Interesting comment over on el gato malo's substack regarding the study. He asked a few of his geneticist friends about the study and he said this response was typical:
“They did not show integration in the genome... but they did show LINE-1 is expressed which has integrase activity.”
“I bet they are a few months away from showing genome integration. They need Deep PacBio Sequencing to do this as the integration events are likely to be different in each cell and hard to pin down in an ensemble collection of cells.”
“This should induce an immediate moratorium on mRNA transfections until WGS is complete on the Huh7 cell lines.”
https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/video-on-cell-and-gene-therapy-from?s=r
This surprised me as I knew LINE-1 has reverse transcription ability (i.e. can convert mRNA to DNA) but I did not know it also had integrase activity. So if I understand this correctly, LINE-1 also has the capability to snip the genome and facilitate DNA insertion (it integrates it, hence its name).
This just gets worse and worse.
BTW, I found both Andreas' and Stephanie's substack via both of your comments over at Igor Chudov's page over the last few days. You guys are both doing good work, thanks for helping advance our knowledge.
I have noticed my subscriptions spike thanks to Igor.
Yes, L1 is a versatile thing, it can move around the genome, as you said 3-in-1, reverse transcribing, cutting, integrating.
These guys will keep denying until it’s banally obvious. Even the Swedes have been extremely circumspect in what they did and didn’t write, not to attract the wreath of the establishment. I have asked them some questions, no response - they seem to be not too happy with all the attention.
I bet. I've been reading vaccine-related studies for over ten years after a close family member suffered a very serious adverse reaction in childhood. There's a pattern that usually followed: State that vaccines are the greatest public health advancement in the history of mankind, describe what was observed in the most sterile terms, downplay the results, and finish up with excuses for why it probably doesn't mean anything.
It's okay to publish findings but they cannot be presented in a fashion that can be construed as even mildly critical. These guys didn't follow the script, probably out of naivete. Hopefully they aren't about to get clobbered.
Edit: Read up on what happened to Andy Wakefield as a preview to what these folks might have in store. Also grab a PDF of the study as it may be retracted.
Edit 2: BTW, Wakefield's Wikipedia page isn't remotely true and was written by the same "science based medicine" crowd that told us the mRNA vax is safe, effective, and should be mandated by law. Wakefield refused to retract and do penance so he was destroyed. Most researchers learned their lesson from this. Vaccines are hallowed ground and writing anything remotely critical sets one up for the Wakefield treatment.
Andreas. You've opened a can of worms here.
Have you yet viewed Shyamalan's "Old"(2021)?
What do you think our friendly "cabal" might be searching for through the swab genomic sequencing, if true?
Yep, seems to be true: https://www.newsweek.com/cdc-says-10-covid-swabs-sent-genome-lab-raising-privacy-questions-1680038, but 10% only.
So, what might that be? Wow! How about measuring how many jabs are still needed to achieve the desired goals? And which populations, genetically speaking, under-perform and need more of their attention? That would make sense to me. Considering that CDC doesn't move a finger to do anything useful in combating the pandemic, suddenly analyzing 10% of buccal swabs. So, in conclusion, they are not searching - they are measuring. IMHO.
Or else, they a building a huge DNA data bank - big data, to be used for their favourite eugenicist studies. I.e., building a perfect Übermensch race.
This technology might make the search much easier.
https://kromatid.com
This can measure chromosomal inserts, deletions, inversions, crossovers, and other changes in one field of view.
Wow!
All good questions. Maybe 10% is their throughput? And they will cover 100% of population with time?
So you liked my idea that they are searching forThe One? How do they know what to look for? Any genetic samples from back then?
Every person’s DNA is unique. It can be used to:
- find where your ancestors might have come from
- whether you have any unknown relatives floating in the ether
- whether you have certain genetic diseases or genetic abnormalities associated with diseases or medical conditions.
My favourite kind of can!
Maybe they are looking for The One?
Kidding! Didn’t think about yet. Maybe I should?
Such a kidder.
To whom do you refer as The One?
In this context, only Neo
Or Jet Lee?
Please clarify. Translate that into something a student of the Bible can make sense of.
Lol, I’m referring to “Matrix” the movie. Just kidding. I have no idea if they are looking, let alone for what. Should look into it.
I know the movie, but have difficulty interpreting/translating the characters into scenarios outside the secular.
No I didn’t watch it. Will look it up tonight, thanks!
Watched the trailer. Something like that...
Thank you, this is great! I really appreciate the mini lecture in the beginning outlining the terrain so it's easier to understand.
This is from the Wikipedia link that Andreas provided, I found it very helpful.
"Cellular senescence is a phenomenon characterized by the cessation of cell division. In their experiments during the early 1960s, Leonard Hayflick and Paul Moorhead found that normal human fetal fibroblasts in culture reach a maximum of approximately 50 cell population doublings before becoming senescent. This process is known as "replicative senescence", or the Hayflick limit. Hayflick's discovery of mortal cells paved the way for the discovery and understanding of cellular aging molecular pathways. Cellular senescence can be initiated by a wide variety of stress inducing factors. These stress factors include both environmental and internal damaging events, abnormal cellular growth, oxidative stress, autophagy factors, among many other things."
Thanks! I love links - makes my posts about 1/5 to 1/10 of what would have to be written otherwise.
I'm going to have to read this a couple of times before I can comment more intelligently as it uses a lot of technical jargon I'm not up to speed on (yet - ha!). I'd appreciate your review of my video and article here - https://wholistic.substack.com/p/if-vaccine-mrna-alters-dna-what-does - if you have some time...I made it for laypeople to discuss the possibility of what might happen if mRNA from covid vaccines gets into cellular DNA.
However, I didn't touch the subject of other potential modifications per some of the rumors. But correct me if I'm wrong, even if the mRNA doesn't have added "stuff" in it, isn't it bad enough as it is, if it were to actually undergo reverse transcription and get into chromosomal DNA? Though...if the rest of this is true...then we're looking at a total nightmare. Thanks. PS Checking out your other article now too.
Thanks, very instructive article! This one is also an instructive one, for the most part.
The chromosome modifications are of little importance if happening in few somatic cells, Long Covid-like disease might be the worst outcome. Eventually the cells expressing S spike should be killed off, unless there is an immune deficiency - then severe AE should be expected. Germline cells with modified chromosomes will be way more portending, basically affecting every cell in the foetus - not likely it will develop/survive, in case of S spike code embedded and actually being expressed. But, this is hypothetical - no confirmed clinical cases to refer to at the moment.
This mRNA monkey business is pretty cool if someone has ulterior motives - go figure what has been really added to the jabs, unless whistleblowers get all the samples and formulas and find an investigative body willing to investigate. We can only do genetic tests on the jabbed, as Igor suggested, at normal level of expertise/equipment. By which time the vast majority of the world population would have been affected. What not to like?
OK, so if I am understanding you correctly, the likely outcome is something like long covid (basically an autoimmune-type disease) and infertility. What about cancer?
That will not be due to the DNA changes. But repeated jabbing with the spikes and mRNA, both lingering for 4-6 months with every jab will do it, and much more. Keep up to date on your jabs, they say.
Don’t shoot the messenger...