Jan 31, 2023·edited Jan 31, 2023Liked by Andreas Oehler
Brilliant reasoning and logic with excellent evidentiary support. I would like to see in vitro test with heart cells and nano-lipid particle uptake and see if this test could produce evidence of heart cells manufacturing S-proteins. There seems to be no reason why they could not, since this tricking of the body into producing toxic foreign proteins is not limited to cell type in principle.
When you look at the level of S-protein in this article, the reasonable conjecture is that the COVID vaccine (mRNA but potentially others as well, with different side effects) when introduced directly into the bloodstream would not allow the antibody system enough time to neutralize the initial or produced S-proteins as they are made at the center of the circulatory system and pumped throughout the body.
Another additional note here, as Bret Weinstein has brought up, heart cells are unfortunately well situated NOT to kick off an immune response. They are by nature a different kind of cell, needing to be active and last a LONG TIME. They are resistant to cancer, but also resistant to immunological intervention, apparently. If you mess with them, in particular, and "turn" them, there are not a lot of responses your body can effectuate to correct the imbalance, and if they start literally "pumping out" S-proteins, you are definitely going to experience problems, as your body has to work from behind and work its way back to the heart.
Brilliant reasoning and logic with excellent evidentiary support. I would like to see in vitro test with heart cells and nano-lipid particle uptake and see if this test could produce evidence of heart cells manufacturing S-proteins. There seems to be no reason why they could not, since this tricking of the body into producing toxic foreign proteins is not limited to cell type in principle.
When you look at the level of S-protein in this article, the reasonable conjecture is that the COVID vaccine (mRNA but potentially others as well, with different side effects) when introduced directly into the bloodstream would not allow the antibody system enough time to neutralize the initial or produced S-proteins as they are made at the center of the circulatory system and pumped throughout the body.
Another additional note here, as Bret Weinstein has brought up, heart cells are unfortunately well situated NOT to kick off an immune response. They are by nature a different kind of cell, needing to be active and last a LONG TIME. They are resistant to cancer, but also resistant to immunological intervention, apparently. If you mess with them, in particular, and "turn" them, there are not a lot of responses your body can effectuate to correct the imbalance, and if they start literally "pumping out" S-proteins, you are definitely going to experience problems, as your body has to work from behind and work its way back to the heart.
I'd rather die from covid or flu or pneumonia than live with bells palsy.
I'm not for suicide.
But natural death is fine over chance of that horror
Typos, Sergei?
"Harward"? If the spelling was deliberate, then ....
Has this study been independently corroborated by at least two others with similar data sets?
Looking at where it was conducted and by whom, I don't accept this "study" without independent validations.
"The study found that the myodarditis subjects had a lot of circulating free S spike whereas **he** control subjects didn’t:"
"What if it was delivered, by accident, into a (small?) blood vessel in the deltoid muscle? "
In seeing how they jabbed people like throwing darts, it would have been IMPOSSIBLE NOT to hit the small blood vessels.
s/Harward/Harvard/g
Andreas, Ot sort if, but this is how they think
https://newspunch.com/cdc-boss-its-time-to-kill-white-people-who-refuse-vaccines/