There are countries in Africa that refused the jab and have put the pandemic behind them. One country I believe is Tanzania. Here at home, I am witnessing a surge in infections among clients and workers. I look at the schedule and see workers names in red indicating that they are off 6-7 days. The names in black are the ones who are covering for them. Red=vaccinated, black=unvaccinated and unaffected like myself. I met another worker today who is boosted and went on vacation to see her grand baby. She became infected with COVID and RSV and transmitted it to the 6mo old grand baby. Her reply was "I'm glad I got the booster, it could have been worse". She was also hospitalized on vacation. I was flabbergasted by her thought process and didn't respond. I guess when the booster obliterates their immune system to the point that they're a walking plethora of disease and they expire their tombstone will say "It could have been so much worse"
"The former have much more “dirt” in them due to the very nature of mass production (Process 2) as compared to the lab-centric cleaner and more controlled, much smaller production scale, trial jabs (Process 1):"
That is slightly incorrect. The process 2 contains 'dirt' that was never used in process 1.
Please, it is not 'your bad'. Thank you again for bringing this to everyone's attention. Again, especially the last graph. Cause I was having a hard time thinking about the earlier graphs matching that to the idea, that some lots are 'dirtier' than others. But the cumulation is what it drives it home hard.
Thanks for your insight! There are two factors at play, as you point out: one is the dirty batches being served to some select countries (probably they knew the expected uptake and played it well to blame them for that), the other one is that even with the "better/cleaner" jabs, their effect is cumulative and the jab gets the recipients in due course, even with purely mRNA/LNP healing properties.
And the later point you are making points to all the 'bad' ideas that are amalgamated into the modRNA/LNP platform. The whole DNA 'dirt' is just the nails, that would not fit into the coffin anymore... (there is only so many one can drive to seal a coffin). Even without the DNA shrapnel, these drugs are killing people, more or less slowly.
Also: I thought you put the last graph at the end of your post to do exactly that: drive the point home... you know, planned and deliberately! =;) Just say: "Sure! That was exactly what I planned and had in mind the whole entire time!" =8)
The article or essay lacks a crucial element: a discussion of how ordinary people like us can put a stop to this nonsense. Are these powerful individuals or groups too formidable to be defeated?
If his gravity reversal and mass as knotted fields propositions applied, would it not be too funny if the Russian hypersonics were based on these "new physical principles"?
"Experts are baffled."
The last graph is what left me gobsmacked. That one is the one that drives the point home. Utterly. Undeniably.
Many COVID mRNA injection apologists have been using Bulgaria as the poster child for the supposed pitfalls of spurning these injections.
Yeah, it looked bad, but only because of the crappy jabs, as I figure. And the rest of Eastern Europe too.
Thank you for this excellent analysis.
There are countries in Africa that refused the jab and have put the pandemic behind them. One country I believe is Tanzania. Here at home, I am witnessing a surge in infections among clients and workers. I look at the schedule and see workers names in red indicating that they are off 6-7 days. The names in black are the ones who are covering for them. Red=vaccinated, black=unvaccinated and unaffected like myself. I met another worker today who is boosted and went on vacation to see her grand baby. She became infected with COVID and RSV and transmitted it to the 6mo old grand baby. Her reply was "I'm glad I got the booster, it could have been worse". She was also hospitalized on vacation. I was flabbergasted by her thought process and didn't respond. I guess when the booster obliterates their immune system to the point that they're a walking plethora of disease and they expire their tombstone will say "It could have been so much worse"
"The former have much more “dirt” in them due to the very nature of mass production (Process 2) as compared to the lab-centric cleaner and more controlled, much smaller production scale, trial jabs (Process 1):"
That is slightly incorrect. The process 2 contains 'dirt' that was never used in process 1.
My bad: more and different "dirt". Correcting.
Please, it is not 'your bad'. Thank you again for bringing this to everyone's attention. Again, especially the last graph. Cause I was having a hard time thinking about the earlier graphs matching that to the idea, that some lots are 'dirtier' than others. But the cumulation is what it drives it home hard.
Thanks for your insight! There are two factors at play, as you point out: one is the dirty batches being served to some select countries (probably they knew the expected uptake and played it well to blame them for that), the other one is that even with the "better/cleaner" jabs, their effect is cumulative and the jab gets the recipients in due course, even with purely mRNA/LNP healing properties.
And the later point you are making points to all the 'bad' ideas that are amalgamated into the modRNA/LNP platform. The whole DNA 'dirt' is just the nails, that would not fit into the coffin anymore... (there is only so many one can drive to seal a coffin). Even without the DNA shrapnel, these drugs are killing people, more or less slowly.
Also: I thought you put the last graph at the end of your post to do exactly that: drive the point home... you know, planned and deliberately! =;) Just say: "Sure! That was exactly what I planned and had in mind the whole entire time!" =8)
It's not misconstruing... What's happening here is not being conflicted...
The article or essay lacks a crucial element: a discussion of how ordinary people like us can put a stop to this nonsense. Are these powerful individuals or groups too formidable to be defeated?
- Luc
I wonder that myself, and sometimes write about it:
https://patrick.net/post/1347631/2022-10-01-effective-resistance-thread
Using silver by weight with each other instead of bullshit "dollars" might be the most effective possible resistance.
I agree with Simulation Commander : Can’t quite figure out why those “experts” are baffled…..(almost funny….sigh..)
Let's engage in some dot connecting https://ourfiniteworld.com/2023/10/25/todays-energy-bottleneck-may-bring-down-major-governments/
There are more dots than you may be aware of. https://royaldutchshellplc.com/2008/01/06/crackpot-or-genius-has-a-shell-boffin-stumbled-on-a-scientific-breakthrough/
What happened on that oil platform? Any reads about that?
"purely by accident the doubling of the magnetic losses in a Shell machine on the Tern platform seems to be doing just this"
Well, it says "by accident" - might John Sinclair elaborate some more now? http://bodgeitandscarper.org/
If his gravity reversal and mass as knotted fields propositions applied, would it not be too funny if the Russian hypersonics were based on these "new physical principles"?