Jun 11, 2022·edited Jun 11, 2022Liked by Andreas Oehler
I'm honestly confused again. Your posts tend to be complex and require a lot of careful reading, maybe with more foreknowledge and training than I have. I wish you would just sum it up, in simple terms and use the complex information for support of your claim. I see there is a summation at the end, but it still doesn't help me to understand the situation. I don't know anything about the effect of S proteins introduced into the body. Can you try to reach laymen in some way that is more comprehensible. Like a section in the post: "Information the average person can actually use":
After wading through all that, I have just one question: That is, please explain why the all cause death rates for each country that has or used to share them gone up for the vaccinated?
That is you can trust the ilk of slopes to tell the truth!
It’s nice to have some studies to look at . There does seem to ge the phenomena of less severe outcomes of the jabbed, and the idea of innate immune suppression has been one hypothesis.
The first thing it tells me , is that the critics agree that the recently jabbed have less severe outcomes . So this is not so much in dispute , despite the manner in which data has been manipulated . It’s hard to get the facts in the now , so this is good to know .
The why has been the question.
Also considering the treatment has been largely suppressed or denied. So for the most part this apparent severity of natural unjabbed infection is the data sccumulation of non treated covid infection.
Still, because the phenomenon seems to occur in the first few weeks from the injection , the suppression of immunity ( known to occur in this period) seems to be a natural reason for it.
Happy your digging deeper into the other questions
I hope that I read one day soon that Snopes wife the hooker threw him down the stairs fracturing his skull and breaking his back (but not killing him) in an attempt to collect on life insurance... so that she can run off with her new pimp and blow the lot on a massive smack bender.
Re-reading this post I'm mightily impressed on how much ground you cover, because there's a lot of background to understand before you even get to the theory. From the early days of COVID treatment protocols, to the vaccines, to the vaccine conspiracies, to the "debunking" of the vaccine conspiracies, then imparting your insight on how the vaccine might actually be working in the very specific case of helping fight COVID pneumonia, and finally leaving the conclusion on the tradeoff between immune system imbalance for protection against COVID pneumonia to the reader themselves.
Question/clarification on your final paragraph: isn't immune suppression itself one of the other consequences of the vaccines? Particularly with their broad side effect profile? Although it might help the body fight organizing pneumonia, if it's taken to an extreme wouldn't it possibly be responsible for some of the broad, seemingly immune disorder related side effects of the vaccines? How does it compare w/immune suppression done with say HCQ? What metrics can we look for to know when immune suppression is helping or hurting?
Anecdotal, the Snopes thing would say: Last December, a 67-year old, triple phizerized non-smoker had a regular MRI scan due to some kidney cysts (preceding the experimental gene interventions). He was also complaining about pain in his shoulder. A month later he was told by the doctors they had seen a spot in his lungs they did not like. In February, he had another MRI scan that confirmed the findings. In March, CT scan helped establish a mere biopsy would not do the trick, and that lung surgery was needed, which was duly performed in April, A chunk of lungs (ca 3 x 4 inches in area) was removed, and histology followed. In May, the patient was told by his specialist that it was only a carcinoid, and he could forget about it all.
How´s those claims (alleged or not) of Dr. Tenpenny´s standing now?
I'm honestly confused again. Your posts tend to be complex and require a lot of careful reading, maybe with more foreknowledge and training than I have. I wish you would just sum it up, in simple terms and use the complex information for support of your claim. I see there is a summation at the end, but it still doesn't help me to understand the situation. I don't know anything about the effect of S proteins introduced into the body. Can you try to reach laymen in some way that is more comprehensible. Like a section in the post: "Information the average person can actually use":
After wading through all that, I have just one question: That is, please explain why the all cause death rates for each country that has or used to share them gone up for the vaccinated?
That is you can trust the ilk of slopes to tell the truth!
Cheers, Brian
It’s nice to have some studies to look at . There does seem to ge the phenomena of less severe outcomes of the jabbed, and the idea of innate immune suppression has been one hypothesis.
The first thing it tells me , is that the critics agree that the recently jabbed have less severe outcomes . So this is not so much in dispute , despite the manner in which data has been manipulated . It’s hard to get the facts in the now , so this is good to know .
The why has been the question.
Also considering the treatment has been largely suppressed or denied. So for the most part this apparent severity of natural unjabbed infection is the data sccumulation of non treated covid infection.
Still, because the phenomenon seems to occur in the first few weeks from the injection , the suppression of immunity ( known to occur in this period) seems to be a natural reason for it.
Happy your digging deeper into the other questions
I hope that I read one day soon that Snopes wife the hooker threw him down the stairs fracturing his skull and breaking his back (but not killing him) in an attempt to collect on life insurance... so that she can run off with her new pimp and blow the lot on a massive smack bender.
Does this make me a bad person?
Re-reading this post I'm mightily impressed on how much ground you cover, because there's a lot of background to understand before you even get to the theory. From the early days of COVID treatment protocols, to the vaccines, to the vaccine conspiracies, to the "debunking" of the vaccine conspiracies, then imparting your insight on how the vaccine might actually be working in the very specific case of helping fight COVID pneumonia, and finally leaving the conclusion on the tradeoff between immune system imbalance for protection against COVID pneumonia to the reader themselves.
Question/clarification on your final paragraph: isn't immune suppression itself one of the other consequences of the vaccines? Particularly with their broad side effect profile? Although it might help the body fight organizing pneumonia, if it's taken to an extreme wouldn't it possibly be responsible for some of the broad, seemingly immune disorder related side effects of the vaccines? How does it compare w/immune suppression done with say HCQ? What metrics can we look for to know when immune suppression is helping or hurting?
Anecdotal, the Snopes thing would say: Last December, a 67-year old, triple phizerized non-smoker had a regular MRI scan due to some kidney cysts (preceding the experimental gene interventions). He was also complaining about pain in his shoulder. A month later he was told by the doctors they had seen a spot in his lungs they did not like. In February, he had another MRI scan that confirmed the findings. In March, CT scan helped establish a mere biopsy would not do the trick, and that lung surgery was needed, which was duly performed in April, A chunk of lungs (ca 3 x 4 inches in area) was removed, and histology followed. In May, the patient was told by his specialist that it was only a carcinoid, and he could forget about it all.
How´s those claims (alleged or not) of Dr. Tenpenny´s standing now?
How bout that time ragnar _forseti got newsmobile (fact checkers from Cyber City, India) & Facebook to remove an erroneous check from Bergeron News
https://ragnarforseti.substack.com/p/is-this-the-most-ridiculous-fact?s=w