Thanks for doing this, Andreas. Sorry, I didn't want to waste any more time trying to make any sense of what the ONS has produced! But you've done a great job. I would add one observation... We might expect non-COVID mortality to drop when COVID is being attributed because not all COVID-mentioned death is excess. Taking this into account for the unvaccinated, your analysis is even more compelling.
Can't wait to see the ONS's BS...*cough* data.... in a couple of months- "protection" is now down to 1 week😐 and then we hit negative town...wonder how they will present that little piece of delight!
If we could all just skip forward to the state of the boosted >21 days ago and stay there, if the ONS data tell the truth... Wait, we are there already, without the ONS help! And we were there all along. Thanks for nothing, Big Harma!
The vast majority of people are MOREONS (MORE - ONS) -- so the odds of actually meeting a non-MOREON in real life is very close to nil.
I've made the mistake when speaking to someone of thinking hmmm... seems like a logical person ... maybe this is a rare non-MOREON... then they launch into a topic such as climate change or EVS or renewable energy or whatever other mass psychosis has captured them ... and I am reminded that the odds of encountering a MOREON are less than winning a lottery (and I don't buy lotto tickets)
One must take to the internet to try to find the non-MOREONS... they tend to gravitate to the same watering holes.
How come no agency was worried about the mortality rates back in the 90s (compared with today). Were more people playing with hand grenades back then??
But you rightly point out all of the numbers that are being "massaged" to fill a narrative.
So, a bit of the "dilution is the solution". You'd figure that the Evil Overlords would be happy with their extermination program and just get on with killing off the local populations without saying anything. Of course, if they were sane, they wouldn't bother with any of this.
You know paxlovid puts the virus on ice, as it were, until the "treatment" ends, just to come back and start kicking again? There is a kink that the jabbed seem to be susceptible to this scenario while not jabbed may be getting a real benefit from this drug. And Pfizer knows it fully well. This tells us that Harris and other high-profile recipients of paxlovid were not administered the jabs.
Andreas: I found your sarcastic use of the term "immortal" made it much harder (in fact, I couldn't do it) to connect your text to the graph. At least for my learning type, it would have worked better for me to see Y-values cited, so that I could grasp what X-values you were referring to.
LOL, such an obviously political inquiry was doomed to fail. If you want to be successful with a FOIA you have to make your request appear to be apolitical.
Thanks for doing this, Andreas. Sorry, I didn't want to waste any more time trying to make any sense of what the ONS has produced! But you've done a great job. I would add one observation... We might expect non-COVID mortality to drop when COVID is being attributed because not all COVID-mentioned death is excess. Taking this into account for the unvaccinated, your analysis is even more compelling.
Got it, adding!
Can't wait to see the ONS's BS...*cough* data.... in a couple of months- "protection" is now down to 1 week😐 and then we hit negative town...wonder how they will present that little piece of delight!
Moving on to giraffe pox
They killed me long ago.
You have the stats here to show it.
I am officially dead, and insane too by these green lines of gratitude.
Thanks.
Now I understand why I don't feel quite alive, I am just not my own dammm self without the Hacksxxxxxine.
Maybe I can get all four shots at once to catch up. Ketchup. Catsup. Ha. Ha . Ha thanks big Harma
Frankly, doubt I'd ever see a doctor again. At less than ten feet social distance , well out of needle range.
If we could all just skip forward to the state of the boosted >21 days ago and stay there, if the ONS data tell the truth... Wait, we are there already, without the ONS help! And we were there all along. Thanks for nothing, Big Harma!
Ya but the CovIDIOTS believe it!!!
And that is the biggest takeaway of this exercise. We have overestimated our peers. The Greeks were right.
The thing is...
The vast majority of people are MOREONS (MORE - ONS) -- so the odds of actually meeting a non-MOREON in real life is very close to nil.
I've made the mistake when speaking to someone of thinking hmmm... seems like a logical person ... maybe this is a rare non-MOREON... then they launch into a topic such as climate change or EVS or renewable energy or whatever other mass psychosis has captured them ... and I am reminded that the odds of encountering a MOREON are less than winning a lottery (and I don't buy lotto tickets)
One must take to the internet to try to find the non-MOREONS... they tend to gravitate to the same watering holes.
How come no agency was worried about the mortality rates back in the 90s (compared with today). Were more people playing with hand grenades back then??
But you rightly point out all of the numbers that are being "massaged" to fill a narrative.
So, a bit of the "dilution is the solution". You'd figure that the Evil Overlords would be happy with their extermination program and just get on with killing off the local populations without saying anything. Of course, if they were sane, they wouldn't bother with any of this.
and 90s
But buffets, soroses and kissingers of the world look better with every passing every day, how come? Even gateses.
You know paxlovid puts the virus on ice, as it were, until the "treatment" ends, just to come back and start kicking again? There is a kink that the jabbed seem to be susceptible to this scenario while not jabbed may be getting a real benefit from this drug. And Pfizer knows it fully well. This tells us that Harris and other high-profile recipients of paxlovid were not administered the jabs.
Kissinger has greatly improved in the last few years, so!
Bayesian war crimes. You’re not considered ‘vaccinated’ (I cringe at using this term) until 14 days after the jab?
“Immunity”, not immunity. An important point to keep in mind.
I should return to the role of exosomes in the S spike-induced “immunity” and how it works in reality - nothing like the real immunity.
As long as you don’t believe nothing they say you’ll be all right! If there was a triple-negative, I would’ve used that.
Meaning, they are complicit and on a mission.
Andreas: I found your sarcastic use of the term "immortal" made it much harder (in fact, I couldn't do it) to connect your text to the graph. At least for my learning type, it would have worked better for me to see Y-values cited, so that I could grasp what X-values you were referring to.
I tried to do both, will comb through and supplement.
Thanks, I was getting second thoughts LOL!
It is possible to request custom datasets from the ONS.
To fit any narrative?
How about putting them against a wall and politely asking again?
LOL, such an obviously political inquiry was doomed to fail. If you want to be successful with a FOIA you have to make your request appear to be apolitical.
BTW, I have been successful with two FOIAs.
Which country?
Great material for your next post then?