45 Comments
User's avatar
The BarefootHealer's avatar

Its speeding up aging within the cells. 😐

Its not enough to tag and bag them as they occur.

They want it all on a particular time frame, to be done and dusted by a particular date endpoint.🤔

HIV- people can live decades before the immune system succumbs. Particularly if they are actively pursuing lifestyle habits that support the immune system.

Likewise with cancers. These shots are carcinogenic and likely contain HIV modifications, as gain of function suggests.

If you want to maximise your profits, over a long-term, for treatments. Then you want a continuous stream of patients that don't die in the short term, but need continuous therapeutics.

If you want that, but also want to bankrupt the financial system to change to a new one, then those therapeutics need to be justifiably expensive.

If you want all that, PLUS you want to install a global government with a global "healthcare" system, all regulated and run by a select few, then you need a lot of people to be sick and suffering, all around the world, for a short while, but you need a series of planned events to culminate in a scheduled mass tragedy, to allow the installation, "for the good of all".

Hence, the accelated aging.

🤔

Hmmmmmm......let me think, W.H.O could organise all that....

Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

Bill +WEF-->BMGF +WHO-->GAVI +World Bank -->CEPI +NIH+DHS--> Operation Warp Speed +Your Gov't--> Vaxx Mandates. It's a Russian doll. Who's inside?

Expand full comment
Andreas's avatar

The un-credited Event 201 sponsor? For starters. WEF/BMGF didn't coordinate this conspiracy on their own. People with actual power did that.

Expand full comment
The BarefootHealer's avatar

I think Dr David Martin traced back to a whole bunch of "who's NOT listed" contributors.

The "who's inside"?

Are you looking for the single operator, Dr Evil type? The evil genius? The puppet master?

In my experience, evil is often far more comfortable in groups than standing alone. I think it's the confidence in the group context that also covers the insideous, mundane bureaucratic-like evil.

Does it make it easier for us as humanity to deal with, accept or rail against, by casting about for a responsible entity? I think yes it does, because then we don't have to accept responsibility for allowing this to occur. We chose to outsource our responsibilities that enable self determination.

Therein lies the quandary, the banality of evil. Sometimes it's just a group that all choose, without needing to discuss, to look the other way.

Even if an individual or a group, or a whole country turns out to be fully responsible, how does it change what has occurred and where we are going?

Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

It does, in dictating the next steps.

Expand full comment
The BarefootHealer's avatar

I'm glad someone can consider the next steps, it's above my pay grade!😉🤣😂

Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

LOL!

Expand full comment
Jayne Doe's avatar

Many vaxxed have stated hair lose, greying, and other aging related side effects. These are being noticed right away regardless of 1st, 2nd, or 3rd dose.

Expand full comment
Kirsten's avatar

Yes, I know a vaxxed person who look like he's aged 10 years in the past year.

Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

Writing a post touching on exactly this phenomenon - thanks for the corroboration!

Expand full comment
Kirsten's avatar

Great, I was going to ask on this thread if anyone knew the process involved in aging and this vaccine, so I look forward to your post. Thank you!

Expand full comment
Kirsten's avatar

Hmmm, I wonder W.H.O....

Expand full comment
The BarefootHealer's avatar

If I had to pick an individual with most to gain/benefit from the last few years, and currently moving forward, definitely Tedros is up there, in my book.but that's just too Hollywood for real life🤔🤣😂

Expand full comment
BHerr's avatar

Holy shit, that was chunky and tangible. Great research and input.

Expand full comment
Jeff C's avatar

So why does the vaxx mRNA upregulate LINE-1 expression? Lots of questions raised in the paper but this one seems really important. In the discussion section the authors talk around it in a very long paragraph with all sorts of handwaving but they never really address the point directly. They end with, "The exact regulation of LINE-1 activity in response to BNT162b2 merits further study." Ya think?

These guys don't seem dumb and I get the impression they are dodging the question. Might be worth contacting the authors directly and asking them as they may have thoughts they weren't willing to publish.

Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

Already done, ante to writing this post, but as they dodge, I doubt I’ll fox them out. I’ll poke them again, post. The pun not intended, just an accident.

Expand full comment
Barry O'Kenyan's avatar

Typo:

Lovely! Shouldn’t these studies have been performed by Pfizer, Moderna, NIH, EMA before the **jabbs** were administered?

Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

Now I see it!

Expand full comment
Kirsten's avatar

😅😅😅

Expand full comment
Survivedwithcannabis's avatar

I get the impression we need to be able to have done kind of testing available . And we should

Also see how the infected non vaxx show on testing as well

Expand full comment
handyman's avatar

supposition: staining intensity of Cytosol + Nucleus = total area

Conclusion: either the supposition is false or it is a linear scale.

For each exposure level if you add the top data point in Cytosol and Nucleus it appears to match the top datapoint in Total area. This wouldn't be the case if they were log scales and the supposition was true.

Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

You are right. Correcting for the time being, assuming linearity.

Expand full comment
CIAheartsKGB's avatar

A metaphor you may find useful for your further analyses. If you set out to build a tank, you design it to employ the most lethal, portable guns in your arsenal.

Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

On top of Trojan Horse?

Expand full comment
Kirsten's avatar

You are funny today 😅

Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

Gallows humour...

Expand full comment
Cheeps's avatar

Alas, it seems the enemy already accounted for maximum miniaturized lethality. Even their "tanks" are unmarked...to protect the aggressors.

Some devious efficiency went into this, there's no disputing! They are certainly owed for their efforts; riches somehow seem trifling.

Luke 8:17:

17 For nothing is secret, that shall not be made manifest; neither any thing hid, that shall not be known and come abroad. (KJV)

Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

With the https://live2fightanotherday.substack.com/p/lasting-legacy-of-trojan-horses, if true, they went a bridge too far. As it will be undeniable and provable.

Expand full comment
Cheeps's avatar

Provable? THE SOONER, THE BETTER.

We, indeed, have an enemy at the gates. Actually, an enemy WITHIN the Gates...

With the injury and death thus far, they went a bridge too far.

Expand full comment
Thomas Gold's avatar

One thing I'd like to add.

"Lovely! Shouldn’t these studies have been performed by Pfizer, Moderna, NIH, EMA before the jabs were administered? And the results made widely available and discussed? Rhetorical questions at this point, but worth asking nonetheless. “WTH!” - to put it mildly.

The study does not test whether thus reverse-transcribed DNA actually integrates into the human chromosomes."

Those studies actually have been undertaken, they're just classified.

From Moderna Patent US10272150B2 Combination PIV3/hMPV RNA Vaccines:

"With this technique however comes potential problems, including the possibility of insertional mutagenesis, which could lead to the activation of oncogenes or the inhibition of tumor suppressor genes."

So what is insertional mutagenesis?

"Insertional mutagenesis is the phenomenon by which an exogenous DNA sequence integrates within the genome of a host organism."

Cancer gene discovery: exploiting insertional mutagenesis, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3836224/

I'm personally sick and tired of having to show mechanisms for things staring us in the face... like we have to prove what they admit?!

Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

I love your deep comments!

"including the possibility of insertional mutagenesis, which could lead" - caveats-caveats. They pretend to cover their asses with them, and FDA/EMA/WHO play along.

The game is they throw in the possibilities but do not pursue them. When things happen, they say "see, we told ya, you didn't heed". Like the granny needs to do her own medical research when deciding whether to take a treatment recommended to her by the establishment?

Expand full comment
Thomas Gold's avatar

It's so odd isn't it. In the book Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare by Hoffman he argues the reason they tell us what they do is because in their occult religion in order for them not to be guilty of their crimes we have to be culpable in our own subjugation.

I'm not sure if the story was verified but I saw this play out it in the French court case that ruled death by vaccination was suicide.

Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

Thanks for a pointer to the book! Found a free PDF (the 1992 edition), and this opus: "Notes from Michael A. Hoffman II’s “Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare (2001)” https://911nwo.com/?p=3800

Already learned a few things - wow!

Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

Now that is a missing piece of the puzzle I was looking for! Now those caveats make not only a secular, but also mystic sense.

I believe it was an "insurance denied" case, also not sure if fake.

Expand full comment
Henry's avatar

The challenge for us non specialists is understanding the jargon sufficient to make a judgement about plausibility of what the paper is arguing. For example I notice there is a letter appended to the paper which argues alternative explanations for all the phenomena observed by the authors. Other than a knee jerk “they would say that wouldn’t they” reaction, on what basis can we judge the plausibility of this letter? This whole debate requires experienced dedicated scientists from both ‘sides’ to debate these findings dispassionately and without fear of loss or reprisal. Fat chance.

Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

Build it, and they will come! Hallelujah! Divine intervention sometimes comes later than we would wish, but it cometh.

Expand full comment
Henry's avatar

Yes, the building bricks are relentlessly being placed in position by dedicated ethicists, and the ‘dots’ are being connected for people to see the truth. For example, reading the attached Nuremberg 2.0 commentary there is sufficient mention of “DNA” to begin to understand the seminal importance of the papers like the one you are bringing to our

attention.

https://thewhiterose.uk/nuremberg-trial-2-0-watch-day-one-of-grand-jury/

Expand full comment
Jayne Doe's avatar

Oh my,. It's all I got left in me today. Thank you for the further analysis Andreas. Still wished I had my MS Genomics alma mater to talk to but they All drank the Purple Kool Aid and are now working on variants with a $500,000.00 NIH grant.

Expand full comment
Steve Finney.'s avatar

A French geneticist & RNA expert also had some doubts - https://twitter.com/CaudeHenrion/status/1498216372391890948

Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

Based on the same 2 studies.

Expand full comment
Steve Finney.'s avatar

Have you seen this Andreas ? - Heavy Artillery credential wise & thank you for your great work.

https://phmpt.org/

Expand full comment
Andreas Oehler's avatar

Thank you for contributing to the discussion! This is Aaron Siri's case: https://aaronsiri.substack.com/

Expand full comment
Barry O'Kenyan's avatar

"Lovely! Shouldn’t these studies have been performed by Pfizer, Moderna, NIH, EMA before the jabs were administered?' Very droll...

Expand full comment