We have not a single clue about their master plans. All our conclusions can only be based on what we see in a very narrow window of time. Tempting as it sounds, drawing “final” conclusions is not productive, first because they may be wrong (and then our reactions will be completely wrong), secondly because they revolve around various for…
We have not a single clue about their master plans. All our conclusions can only be based on what we see in a very narrow window of time. Tempting as it sounds, drawing “final” conclusions is not productive, first because they may be wrong (and then our reactions will be completely wrong), secondly because they revolve around various forms of fear, which in itself is destructive. Also, we don’t know who “they” are. Those who appear publicly or who manage companies or finances most probably are not the driving forces. Spreading bulk accusations may cause collateral damage to “us” who work among or with or for “them”. So it all looks like a long dark night with a lot of fog around.
Until top key players from “them” step up as whistleblowers, the only reasonably approach for “us” is to clean up the mess at hand. For the argument’s sake, the manufacturers have always been far away from the place where the misleading injection was administered. But you know the person who did it to you. You had a chance to talk to that person and to draw real time- and space-sensitive conclusions. With a non-judgmental approach, communication with the lowest-tier healthcare personnel is the only thing that “we” can do to prevent future events out of control.
By all this, I don’t mean the abandonment of liability. I mean that everybody is now affected by these four years in one way or another. Intense focusing on “them” and “ah, what have they done” won’t calm down strong emotions. In some, the result may be quite the opposite, triggering pain-based clinging to the past. “They” have managed to hijack 4 years of Life. Isn’t it time for us to return to our place and build our personal life with our personal time? Without giving any more of our energy to them? It’s a complex issue, anyway.
We have not a single clue about their master plans. All our conclusions can only be based on what we see in a very narrow window of time. Tempting as it sounds, drawing “final” conclusions is not productive, first because they may be wrong (and then our reactions will be completely wrong), secondly because they revolve around various forms of fear, which in itself is destructive. Also, we don’t know who “they” are. Those who appear publicly or who manage companies or finances most probably are not the driving forces. Spreading bulk accusations may cause collateral damage to “us” who work among or with or for “them”. So it all looks like a long dark night with a lot of fog around.
Until top key players from “them” step up as whistleblowers, the only reasonably approach for “us” is to clean up the mess at hand. For the argument’s sake, the manufacturers have always been far away from the place where the misleading injection was administered. But you know the person who did it to you. You had a chance to talk to that person and to draw real time- and space-sensitive conclusions. With a non-judgmental approach, communication with the lowest-tier healthcare personnel is the only thing that “we” can do to prevent future events out of control.
By all this, I don’t mean the abandonment of liability. I mean that everybody is now affected by these four years in one way or another. Intense focusing on “them” and “ah, what have they done” won’t calm down strong emotions. In some, the result may be quite the opposite, triggering pain-based clinging to the past. “They” have managed to hijack 4 years of Life. Isn’t it time for us to return to our place and build our personal life with our personal time? Without giving any more of our energy to them? It’s a complex issue, anyway.