It was worried originally that by making an explicit US bill of rights, that eventually every freedom not specifically listed would be assumed to be unprotected. Removing bodily autonomy should be assumed, and easily argued to be a basic freedom. A precedent should be set by applying amendment 9 in practice.
This seem interesting. I have not watched the documentary therein, but Pascal Najadi is a powerful guy, and seems to be moving aggressively with the "conclusions".
I saw a recent talk from a guy whose focus is genetics. He went on with the downfall of the civilization coming at the hand of decadence. Short story, the only ones who will go forward are those religious conservatives who continue to breed successfully and hold their autonomy, even if it is "harder" than the baseline of the effete cosmopolitans. Those who virtue signal, introvert only on their own pleasures, or look for Big Daddy Govt to be their carer will ultimately not make it. Given recent outcomes, those who still flock to "solutions" provided by an increasingly autocratic overlord class will end up impaired, drained and dead (in that order).
2019/202 marked the new era in the medical landscape. The old clan is made up of - you’ve guessed it - old people. All the prominent figures behind the events of the recent ten years or so are already on the verge of the Unknown. They have been working their whole lives to secure immortality for themselves, and they have failed. Now, finally, this conclusion is clear to them. All they have managed to build are huge pockets of money (including prestige, power, and manipulation skills). Whatever they have done, it won’t be of any use to them in a matter of just a few days.
Middle-age medical career seekers may still believe in what this old folks already know is false. Many of them are certainly aware of the futility of their efforts and of the limitations of their profession. But they have invested a lot in it. The cleaning is immense, they won’t let go easily. The “virus” transformation redesigned the structure of medicine. Those middle-age HCWs will now work feverishly to secure their foundations, if only to continue the false prestige. The money they get enhances the illusion, and their medicalese strengthens the image of their uniqueness. But it won’t hold any longer. The key players in the medical market, that is publishers of journals, have already initiated the process of secularisation of the holy science of medicine - open access publications, fortified with pre-prints, successfully destroy their walls.
Naturally enough, new medical classes emerge. Some are contestants, some tried to defend the already dead model, and some stray into “alternative” approaches to medicine. All of these professionals continue their business as usual, only facades change. Despite what has happened, they strive to maintain the old knowledge, the old approaches, and the old interpretations. They continue to use their perception and interpretation models as if their knowledge base is solid and unchanged. But they know - being professionals and experts - they know that the old building is crumbling down. Instead of admitting it, they will try to revive it and keep it alive, possibly even putting it on a ventilator. They will continue to do it until the last breath of the old medical paradigm.
It’s all quite natural for the human business survival mode. However, extraterrestrial beings that look upon us from somewhere else, are all laughing at it. December 2019 brought as a unique opportunity to eliminate all medical errors, blunders and false premises. We had a chance to open a new chapter in life sciences, not only “not doing harm”. It appears to be a lost chance - just because we are in the fourth year of this thing. The longer it lasts, the smaller chances for anyone to admit “we did it wrong”. With passing time, public perception of liability (supported by new discoveries of third-party researchers) for all the wrongdoings of that time will increase. But “we’ve got the power” is not the public camp. I wouldn’t expect any final conclusions or consequences. The only conclusion may be, as one major player in this game warned us, that the next time they won’t make such mistakes. We’ll just have to learn to live with it.
It was worried originally that by making an explicit US bill of rights, that eventually every freedom not specifically listed would be assumed to be unprotected. Removing bodily autonomy should be assumed, and easily argued to be a basic freedom. A precedent should be set by applying amendment 9 in practice.
This seem interesting. I have not watched the documentary therein, but Pascal Najadi is a powerful guy, and seems to be moving aggressively with the "conclusions".
https://substack.com/inbox/post/138248907
That's not the government of all of New Zealand, right? I assume it's just a tribal government with very limited jurisdiction.
Still, a good step to take.
Inside Pharma stack says Big harma about to implode.
I saw a recent talk from a guy whose focus is genetics. He went on with the downfall of the civilization coming at the hand of decadence. Short story, the only ones who will go forward are those religious conservatives who continue to breed successfully and hold their autonomy, even if it is "harder" than the baseline of the effete cosmopolitans. Those who virtue signal, introvert only on their own pleasures, or look for Big Daddy Govt to be their carer will ultimately not make it. Given recent outcomes, those who still flock to "solutions" provided by an increasingly autocratic overlord class will end up impaired, drained and dead (in that order).
To make the people happy vaccinate until illness and death. The only reason they are doing this now is because they can. No one fights.
There will be no conclusions and no consequences.
2019/202 marked the new era in the medical landscape. The old clan is made up of - you’ve guessed it - old people. All the prominent figures behind the events of the recent ten years or so are already on the verge of the Unknown. They have been working their whole lives to secure immortality for themselves, and they have failed. Now, finally, this conclusion is clear to them. All they have managed to build are huge pockets of money (including prestige, power, and manipulation skills). Whatever they have done, it won’t be of any use to them in a matter of just a few days.
Middle-age medical career seekers may still believe in what this old folks already know is false. Many of them are certainly aware of the futility of their efforts and of the limitations of their profession. But they have invested a lot in it. The cleaning is immense, they won’t let go easily. The “virus” transformation redesigned the structure of medicine. Those middle-age HCWs will now work feverishly to secure their foundations, if only to continue the false prestige. The money they get enhances the illusion, and their medicalese strengthens the image of their uniqueness. But it won’t hold any longer. The key players in the medical market, that is publishers of journals, have already initiated the process of secularisation of the holy science of medicine - open access publications, fortified with pre-prints, successfully destroy their walls.
Naturally enough, new medical classes emerge. Some are contestants, some tried to defend the already dead model, and some stray into “alternative” approaches to medicine. All of these professionals continue their business as usual, only facades change. Despite what has happened, they strive to maintain the old knowledge, the old approaches, and the old interpretations. They continue to use their perception and interpretation models as if their knowledge base is solid and unchanged. But they know - being professionals and experts - they know that the old building is crumbling down. Instead of admitting it, they will try to revive it and keep it alive, possibly even putting it on a ventilator. They will continue to do it until the last breath of the old medical paradigm.
It’s all quite natural for the human business survival mode. However, extraterrestrial beings that look upon us from somewhere else, are all laughing at it. December 2019 brought as a unique opportunity to eliminate all medical errors, blunders and false premises. We had a chance to open a new chapter in life sciences, not only “not doing harm”. It appears to be a lost chance - just because we are in the fourth year of this thing. The longer it lasts, the smaller chances for anyone to admit “we did it wrong”. With passing time, public perception of liability (supported by new discoveries of third-party researchers) for all the wrongdoings of that time will increase. But “we’ve got the power” is not the public camp. I wouldn’t expect any final conclusions or consequences. The only conclusion may be, as one major player in this game warned us, that the next time they won’t make such mistakes. We’ll just have to learn to live with it.