28 Comments
Oct 24, 2023Liked by Andreas Oehler

It was worried originally that by making an explicit US bill of rights, that eventually every freedom not specifically listed would be assumed to be unprotected. Removing bodily autonomy should be assumed, and easily argued to be a basic freedom. A precedent should be set by applying amendment 9 in practice.

Expand full comment
author

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Bill_of_Rights

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

Yet, this applies to Federal powers only? The states may override? In Canada, the Bill of Rights trumps provincial powers. NOMINALLY. Nominally, the USSR and North Korea was/is the freest societies imaginable.

Expand full comment
Oct 24, 2023Liked by Andreas Oehler

The latest moth shot reads like something straight out of a Spiderman movie.

And they think the hesitant will fall for it?!

Will any recipients of the moth shot find themselves flying towards the light?!

‘October 3, 2023, the FDA issued EUA for an updated non-mRNA COVID vaccine, Nuvaxovid, a subunit protein vaccine made by Novavax. The spike protein is produced inside moth cells. According to health authorities, this may encourage vaccine uptake among those who are “hesitant about the mRNA vaccines”...’

https://media.mercola.com/ImageServer/Public/2023/October/PDF/nuvaxovid-pdf.pdf

Expand full comment
author

"hesitant" is the new recalcitrant.

Expand full comment

this is actually encouraging since it probably means the “no consent required” 🦟mosquito 🦟 delivery has not been perfected

Expand full comment
Oct 25, 2023Liked by Andreas Oehler

When the perpetrators proceed with such questionable delivery systems without obtaining ‘fully informed’ consent (and devoid of any deception, propaganda, brainwashing, hypnotism, mind control techniques, psy-ops, dulling down of senses, injury/trauma to the body and mind etc.) then surely the perpetrators know that in doing so that they risk exposing themselves to bad karma.

Expand full comment
author

Anything you put in the brackets seems to be fair game for them, as far as I understand. Not being able to see through their shenanigans is on the receiving party?

Expand full comment
Oct 24, 2023Liked by Andreas Oehler

This seem interesting. I have not watched the documentary therein, but Pascal Najadi is a powerful guy, and seems to be moving aggressively with the "conclusions".

https://substack.com/inbox/post/138248907

Expand full comment
author
Oct 24, 2023·edited Oct 24, 2023Author

Please look again at the bottom of my post (P.S.): the ice is broken in NZ, of all places. France, Canada and the Netherlands next?

Expand full comment

‘....NZ Loyal Party leader Liz Gunn issued a post-election update Friday...’

‘We are calling for an inquiry. Not just any inquiry, a full-blown criminal investigation leaving no stone unturned. New Zealand is a crime scene.’

https://vigilantnews.com/post/nz-politician-calls-for-full-blown-criminal-investigation-into-covid-vaccine-deaths

Expand full comment

More information about the Maori Trial in NZ.....

https://expose-news.com/2023/10/26/maori-government-prosecutes-four/

Expand full comment

In Canada, only if a provincial government would take such a step. Sometimes I think we will be the last ones to ditch the whole plandemic crap.

Expand full comment

No that will be the US. It will be the last place these bioweapons are no longer used. We have two more years of this mass murdering. 2025 will be the year when the toxic goo is "quietly" removed from the market after Big Harma's bankruptcy, reorg, and the US government's trust fund established for the lawyers of the shot-injured.

Expand full comment
author

And by that time their mission will have been accomplished, working against the 2026 deadline of the Social Security system collapse. If no 65+ left, no problem! And the EU+UK+Canada can also give the US a heartfelt "Thank You!" for saving their public coffer as well, collaterally.

Expand full comment
Oct 25, 2023Liked by Andreas Oehler

Good point.

Expand full comment
author
Oct 25, 2023·edited Oct 25, 2023Author

I'm glad there are still some ppl left in this day and age that can see through sarcasm!

Expand full comment

That's not the government of all of New Zealand, right? I assume it's just a tribal government with very limited jurisdiction.

Still, a good step to take.

Expand full comment
author
Oct 24, 2023·edited Oct 24, 2023Author

Yes, but it's a very loud and highly symbolic gesture.

Expand full comment
Oct 24, 2023Liked by Andreas Oehler

Inside Pharma stack says Big harma about to implode.

Expand full comment

I saw a recent talk from a guy whose focus is genetics. He went on with the downfall of the civilization coming at the hand of decadence. Short story, the only ones who will go forward are those religious conservatives who continue to breed successfully and hold their autonomy, even if it is "harder" than the baseline of the effete cosmopolitans. Those who virtue signal, introvert only on their own pleasures, or look for Big Daddy Govt to be their carer will ultimately not make it. Given recent outcomes, those who still flock to "solutions" provided by an increasingly autocratic overlord class will end up impaired, drained and dead (in that order).

Expand full comment

We can bow to our overlords or to the Lord. I'll do the latter.

Expand full comment
author
Oct 24, 2023·edited Oct 24, 2023Author

G-d willing!

Expand full comment

To make the people happy vaccinate until illness and death. The only reason they are doing this now is because they can. No one fights.

Expand full comment

There will be no conclusions and no consequences.

2019/202 marked the new era in the medical landscape. The old clan is made up of - you’ve guessed it - old people. All the prominent figures behind the events of the recent ten years or so are already on the verge of the Unknown. They have been working their whole lives to secure immortality for themselves, and they have failed. Now, finally, this conclusion is clear to them. All they have managed to build are huge pockets of money (including prestige, power, and manipulation skills). Whatever they have done, it won’t be of any use to them in a matter of just a few days.

Middle-age medical career seekers may still believe in what this old folks already know is false. Many of them are certainly aware of the futility of their efforts and of the limitations of their profession. But they have invested a lot in it. The cleaning is immense, they won’t let go easily. The “virus” transformation redesigned the structure of medicine. Those middle-age HCWs will now work feverishly to secure their foundations, if only to continue the false prestige. The money they get enhances the illusion, and their medicalese strengthens the image of their uniqueness. But it won’t hold any longer. The key players in the medical market, that is publishers of journals, have already initiated the process of secularisation of the holy science of medicine - open access publications, fortified with pre-prints, successfully destroy their walls.

Naturally enough, new medical classes emerge. Some are contestants, some tried to defend the already dead model, and some stray into “alternative” approaches to medicine. All of these professionals continue their business as usual, only facades change. Despite what has happened, they strive to maintain the old knowledge, the old approaches, and the old interpretations. They continue to use their perception and interpretation models as if their knowledge base is solid and unchanged. But they know - being professionals and experts - they know that the old building is crumbling down. Instead of admitting it, they will try to revive it and keep it alive, possibly even putting it on a ventilator. They will continue to do it until the last breath of the old medical paradigm.

It’s all quite natural for the human business survival mode. However, extraterrestrial beings that look upon us from somewhere else, are all laughing at it. December 2019 brought as a unique opportunity to eliminate all medical errors, blunders and false premises. We had a chance to open a new chapter in life sciences, not only “not doing harm”. It appears to be a lost chance - just because we are in the fourth year of this thing. The longer it lasts, the smaller chances for anyone to admit “we did it wrong”. With passing time, public perception of liability (supported by new discoveries of third-party researchers) for all the wrongdoings of that time will increase. But “we’ve got the power” is not the public camp. I wouldn’t expect any final conclusions or consequences. The only conclusion may be, as one major player in this game warned us, that the next time they won’t make such mistakes. We’ll just have to learn to live with it.

Expand full comment
author

Except, that is the last thing they plan for us?

Expand full comment

We have not a single clue about their master plans. All our conclusions can only be based on what we see in a very narrow window of time. Tempting as it sounds, drawing “final” conclusions is not productive, first because they may be wrong (and then our reactions will be completely wrong), secondly because they revolve around various forms of fear, which in itself is destructive. Also, we don’t know who “they” are. Those who appear publicly or who manage companies or finances most probably are not the driving forces. Spreading bulk accusations may cause collateral damage to “us” who work among or with or for “them”. So it all looks like a long dark night with a lot of fog around.

Until top key players from “them” step up as whistleblowers, the only reasonably approach for “us” is to clean up the mess at hand. For the argument’s sake, the manufacturers have always been far away from the place where the misleading injection was administered. But you know the person who did it to you. You had a chance to talk to that person and to draw real time- and space-sensitive conclusions. With a non-judgmental approach, communication with the lowest-tier healthcare personnel is the only thing that “we” can do to prevent future events out of control.

By all this, I don’t mean the abandonment of liability. I mean that everybody is now affected by these four years in one way or another. Intense focusing on “them” and “ah, what have they done” won’t calm down strong emotions. In some, the result may be quite the opposite, triggering pain-based clinging to the past. “They” have managed to hijack 4 years of Life. Isn’t it time for us to return to our place and build our personal life with our personal time? Without giving any more of our energy to them? It’s a complex issue, anyway.

Expand full comment